Author: tio

  • Tribal Rule Trumps Regulation as Yemen Warlords Plunder Marble

    Tribal Rule Trumps Regulation as Yemen Warlords Plunder Marble

    Standing in the arid, scorchingly hot desert of central Yemen’s Marib province, Abdullah Ahmed Ali Shawdaq appears in his element. 

    The tribal warlord, who is sporting a crisp white shirt and a camouflage-patterned scarf wrapped around his head, is surrounded by a coterie of young men in military gear, carrying rifles and walkie talkies. 

    These are members of his militia who also serve as his protection detail, escorting their leader in pick-up trucks across the region’s rocky, flood-prone roads. 

    But the middle-aged sheikh is not only a military commander whose forces have helped fend off Houthi rebels. He is also a businessman. 

    Satellite views of the Thaniyah mountain range in Marib province, Yemen, between 2014 and 2025, show the expansion of quarries.

    Since the outbreak of Yemen’s civil war, Shawdaq has cemented his grip over marble quarries in Marib’s Thaniyah mountain range, where he told reporters he employs thousands of workers who use heavy machinery to extract, cut, and transport huge chunks of the valuable stone. 

    “Everyone has a destiny written for him,” he said of how his father first discovered marble in the desert’s hillsides. 

    Today, anyone with the resources to do so is free to mine the mountains “without any intervention” from the state, he added.  

    Legally, this is not the case. Extracting marble in Yemen requires a government license and payment of royalties, with the natural resource considered property of the state. However, Yemen’s more than decade-long civil war has fractured and paralyzed the country’s bureaucracy, disrupting the official licensing process and robbing the industry of government oversight. 

    As a result, the lucrative marble sector in Marib province is operating largely as a free-for-all, illustrating the immense challenges of governance in the impoverished but resource-rich state riven by war.

    “Tribal sheikhs consider themselves above the authority,” said Anwar Qasim Saeed, the director of minerals for the licensing authority run by Yemen’s internationally-recognized government (IRG). He confirmed that no official licenses have been issued for marble excavation in Marib province since the conflict began in 2014.

    “The areas aren’t easy for the state to claim as its own because, in [the tribes’] view, ‘this is ours,’” explained Ismail Nasser Al Ganad, a geologist who previously chaired Yemen’s mineral licensing body. “We tell them yes, the mountains are indeed yours, but the resources beneath them also belong to the state.”

    Though tribal leaders have long served as key powerbrokers in Yemen, they have become an even more influential force in Marib since the conflict erupted. This is particularly true for tribes that have helped government forces repel Houthi incursions in the province, says Mohammed Ali Thamer, a Yemeni researcher in international economics and relations.

    With government oversight falling by the wayside and tribal leaders rising to fill the void, the entire mining industry has been left vulnerable to “waves of random prospecting, scavenging, looting, and the destruction of mines,” he added. 

    Shawdaq, a leader in the powerful Abida tribe, initially told reporters that he operated his quarries without a license and that he had stopped paying the state dues since the war.

    “We are prepared to pay anything to the state, but it must provide us with fuel, electricity, and essential services,” he told reporters, adding that the state has been “negligent.” 

    Yet the sheikh pivoted during a follow-up conversation by phone, claiming he paid the government annual fees and held a license covering all his activities. His demeanor then changed and he accused OCCRP of provoking him and interfering in his affairs.

    He later sent reporters several documents showing he had paid tax on his marble company’s profits to authorities in Marib, though he did not provide any evidence of holding a valid license or having paid annual fees or royalties. He did not respond to questions about how many quarries he owns.

    The IRG’s Ministry of Oil and Minerals, and the affiliated licensing authority, did not respond to requests to comment about Shawdaq’s case. 

    Lost Potential

    A centuries-old staple of Yemeni construction, marble is the main source of income in the desert northeast of Marib city, where quarries create jagged white scars etched into the brown slopes of the surrounding mountains.  

    There are no farms or livestock as far as the eye can see on the flat plains below the mines, but only small makeshift houses hosting the miners in basic conditions.  

    The surrounding sands are littered with massive marble boulders which are transported by truck for sale in the domestic market or to neighbouring countries like Saudi Arabia and Oman. 

    Wearing a patterned scarf, and an ornate jambiya — traditional Yemeni dagger —   another quarry owner delved into how tribal views of ownership clash with the perspective of the state. 

    Ali Abdallah Saleh Ruqaisian, who also belongs to Marib’s Abida tribe, said the sheikhs “own” the mountains by ancestral right. “We have ancestral traditions and customs,” he explained, noting that a senior sheikh had long ago “ruled on this matter.” 

    “This mountain is mine,” he said, gesturing toward a rock formation. He said he realized the site’s value over a decade ago, opened a quarry, and later handed it to an investor for a fee of 100,000 Saudi riyals (approximately $26,000). 

    “I don’t pay the state anything,” he told reporters. “We don’t pay and we won’t pay… The state wants the citizen to remain under its boot. … After the oil, now they want to take our hard work? No.”

    Before the war, a World Bank report estimated that investment in new large quarries in Yemen’s marble and granite sector could generate $20 to $30 million in annual sales. One obstacle, local media reported at the time, was a lack of transportation and export infrastructure. 

    The war has divided the country, and the licensing authority, in two. The conflict has also deepened logistical challenges, with the Saudi-backed IRG sitting in Aden on one side, and the Iran-backed Houthi rebels controlling the country’s previous capital Sanaa.. 

    “In Sana’a they work independently from the one in Aden… There are no joint projects, nor are there any funded projects,” said IAl Ganad, the former chair of Yemen’s mineral licensing body.

    The war has also seen old roads cut off, and new routes opened through the desert that are “susceptible to looting, robbery, and sometimes killing by some tribes if ‘desert transit fees’ are not paid,” said Thamer, the researcher. 

    And tracing who owns what — or where the profits are going — is nearly impossible. 

    Like the rest of the state, corporate registries are split between Yemen’s two administrations, and their maintenance appears to be minimal.

    The tribal leader Shawdaq, for instance, is the director general manager of Abdullah Ahmed Bin Shawdaq for Marble & Granite Establishment, which has advertised custom-cut white marble on Facebook. 

    While Shawdaq showed reporters an IRG-issued commercial registration card from 2022, his company is absent from the IRG’s official online registry.

    Records obtained by reporters show the company sold a little over 81 tonnes of marble to a Saudi firm for over $2,300 in February 2025. When asked about this sale, Shawdaq said this was a sample exported with “official export permits” for technical evaluation. 

    Clashes at the Quarries 

    Yemen’s tribes have long exercised varying levels of autonomy and influence in the country, particularly in times of conflict and crisis. 

    They are “one of the most important factors that affect the Yemeni state’s policy” and “the largest pressure group in the country throughout history,” reads a 2020 report from the Abaad Studies and Research Center, a Yemeni non-profit. 

    The power of tribes in Marib is connected to the region’s military dynamics, especially since 2020 when the tribes fought significant battles against the Houthis, making them an important ally of the IRG.

    However, the alliance is fragile. 

    Tribal interests do not always align with those of the government, said Luca Nevola, a Yemen analyst at Armed Conflict Location & Event Data, a U.S.-based research center. He noted how Marib’s marble quarries have become a flashpoint for violence.  

    In May 2025, for instance, Abida tribesmen ambushed IRG forces and captured 25 soldiers. 

    “The reason behind the clash was the IRG forces’ intervention in a tribal dispute over a stone quarry,” Nevola said. 

    The ongoing war has also cost Yemen untold amounts of desperately-needed revenue from mining marble and other minerals in Marib. Amid the conflict, most miners are able to escape paying fees to the government, said Ali Mohamed Ali Ghaithan, who runs the only licensed iron mine in Marib.

    “When entrepreneurs working in this sector manipulate the system, operating outside the government’s purview, the state suffers substantial losses,” he said.

  • X Asks Court to Dismiss Music Piracy Lawsuit After Supreme Court’s Cox Ruling

    X Asks Court to Dismiss Music Piracy Lawsuit After Supreme Court’s Cox Ruling

    In a complaint filed at a Nashville federal court in 2023, Universal Music, Sony Music, EMI and others, accused X Corp of ‘breeding’ mass copyright infringement.

    The social media company allegedly failed to respond adequately to takedown notices and lacked a proper termination policy.

    The National Music Publishers Association (NMPA), for example, claimed it had sent over 300,000 formal infringement notices, many of which didn’t lead to immediate removals.

    “Twitter routinely ignores known repeat infringers and known infringements, refusing to take simple steps that are available to Twitter to stop these specific instances of infringement of which it is aware,” the music companies alleged.

    X Won the First Battle

    In 2024, X scored a partial win when the court dismissed the music publishers’ direct and vicarious copyright infringement claims, and partially dismissed claims of contributory infringement.

    The court concluded that X can’t be held liable for making it ‘very easy’ to upload infringing material or for monetizing pirated content. Those characteristics are not exclusive to infringing material and apply to legitimate content.

    While this was a partial win for X, most of the contributory infringement claim remained intact, and the lawsuit was allowed to move forward on those grounds.

    Among other things, the music companies argued that X is liable because it willingly turned a blind eye to pirating users, especially those who have a blue checkmark. However, according to a new filing by X this week, new legal developments warrant a full dismissal now.

    Cox Sets the New Standard

    Last Friday, X informed the Tennessee federal court about the Supreme Court decision in Cox v. Sony, which was decided in favor of the ISP last week. This ruling also concerns a ‘repeat infringer’ case, and it sets a clear standard for contributory copyright infringement.

    Under the Supreme Court’s new standard, a service provider can only be held contributorily liable if it intended its service to be used for infringement. That intent can be shown in just two ways: the provider actively induced copyright infringement through specific acts, or the service has no substantial non-infringing uses. Nothing else qualifies.

    X argues that the music publishers’ surviving claim fails both tests. Social media is clearly capable of substantial non-infringing uses, and the publishers never alleged that X took specific steps to actively encourage infringement.

    The social media platform argues that, under the new Cox precedent, the contributory infringement claim fails as a matter of law and the entire case should be dismissed.

    “F the DMCA”

    To stress that there is a high bar for these infringement claims, X directly references some of the most damning evidence in the Cox case, which was not enough to establish liability.

    “Cox even expressed contempt for copyright law, writing emails with comments like ‘F the DMCA.’ Despite these facts, the Supreme Court had no trouble reversing the jury’s contributory-infringement verdict, because such facts were not ‘evidence of express promotion, marketing, and intent to promote infringement,” X notes in its filing.

    The comparison is somewhat ironic, as Elon Musk himself once publicly described the DMCA as a “plague on humanity”, which the music publishers cited in their original complaint as evidence of a hostile attitude toward copyright.

    While controversial, these statements don’t appear to matter for a contributory infringement claim, as they don’t actively induce copyright infringement. Therefore, X believes that the present case should be dismissed.

    “If the Supreme Court had issued this opinion three years ago, X believes this Court would have dismissed Plaintiffs’ contributory-infringement claim in its entirety. Indeed, virtually every contributory-infringement case Plaintiffs cited in opposing X’s motion to dismiss – including the Fourth Circuit case on which this Court relied – is no longer good law,” X writes.

    Millions at Stake

    X is not simply flagging the Supreme Court ruling for the record. The social media platform asks Judge Trauger for a status conference before both sides spend millions more on a case that may have already been rendered pointless.

    There are various motions pending while the case is heading to summary judgment, and X asks the court to reconsider whether the new Cox precedent warrants a more streamlined process.

    “If the Court would prefer to address these issues at summary judgment, X is prepared to do so. But both sides are now poised to spend millions of dollars in fees and expert expenses in the coming months on issues that Cox makes irrelevant as a matter of law,” X writes.

    X says that it plans to move for judgment on the pleadings, or alternatively, it will ask the court to reconsider its earlier motion to dismiss ruling in light of new legal reality. For now, X is proposing a hearing to find the most efficient path forward.

    Whatever the court decides, the legal standoff between X and the music industry will be far from over. Earlier this year, Elon Musk’s company filed a landmark antitrust complaint against the NMPA, Sony, Universal, and other major music publishers, alleging that they “weaponized” the DMCA to force licensing deals.

    A copy of X’s notice, filed earlier this week at the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, is available here (pdf).

    Update: The music companies filed a response in court, agreeing to stay the matter temporarily, until the court decides how to move forward (pdf).

    From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

  • The Doctor’s Voice: Why AI Health Chatbots Believe Medical Lies

    Framing misinformation as coming from “a senior doctor” overrides skepticism

    The post The Doctor’s Voice: Why AI Health Chatbots Believe Medical Lies first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.

  • How DWeb Camp is Being Built in Berlin

    How DWeb Camp is Being Built in Berlin

    At the legendary c-base, technologists, activists, and artists gathered to shape the next chapter of the decentralized web.

    c-base is a space station that “crashed” and is being reconstructed along the Spree river by a group of Berlin hackers. Some call it the mother of all hackerspaces.

    On a gray February morning in Berlin, people wandered down a dark ramp into a space station.

    Not a metaphorical one—at least not entirely. c-base, with its blinking lights, maze of cables, and decades of hacker lore, has long described itself as a space station that crashed on Earth 4.5 billion years ago. Since the mid-1990s it has been a gathering place for coders and tinkerers who prefer to build the future themselves rather than wait for it to arrive.

    On this particular morning, they had come to design something new.

    In February, an invitation had circulated across Europe’s decentralized technology networks: come to c-base and help shape the next DWeb Camp, a five-day gathering that will take place this July in the forests of Brandenburg.

    There was no fixed agenda, and no finished plan.

    Just a question.

    If we were to build the next version of DWeb Camp together, what might it look like?

    Before long, the room filled. Peer-to-peer developers had come from Edinburgh, free-software advocates from Berlin, privacy-first technologists from Shanghai, and policy thinkers from Copenhagen. Artists, funders, open-source builders, and organizers filtered in carrying laptops and winter coats. Most of them had never met before.

    They had come not just to attend—but to help build something.

    The timing was not accidental. Across the world, the systems shaping the internet—and increasingly public life—are consolidating. Governments tighten control. Platforms encroach on our privacy. The internet as we know it is splintering, and along with it, our consensus about what is true. For many in the room that morning, the pressing question was can we restructure the web before it hardens into something more destructive than its early architects ever imagined?

    DWeb Camp, first held in Northern California in 2019, grew out of that concern. The gathering was conceived as a place where technologists, artists, organizers, and policymakers might come together to begin building a more decentralized web.

    A web built less like a pyramid and more like a forest. Distributed. Resilient. Sharing resources underground.

    This summer, DWeb Camp’s theme is “Root Systems,” and it moves to Europe for the first time. The meeting at c-base was an early step in imagining what might grow there.

    For an hour, Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle answered the questions of DWeb Sr. Organizer, Wendy Hanamura, in a wide-ranging chat about public AI, his successes and failures, and the imperative for decentralization in this political moment.

    Origins of a Decentralized Gathering

    “It feels like I’m coming home,” Brewster Kahle, founder of the Internet Archive, said when he opened the morning.

    Kahle traces some of the inspiration for DWeb Camp to the Chaos Communication Camp, the sprawling hacker gathering he first attended in 2003. But his vision was always more focused: an event where technologists could work alongside artists, organizers, and policymakers to imagine and build the infrastructure of a decentralized web.

    “A web that’s more private, more reliable, but still fun,” he said, hopping up and down. “A web with many winners.”

    Collective Intelligence

    “It feels like I’m coming home,” Brewster Kahle, founder of the Internet Archive, said when he opened the morning.

    Kahle traces some of the inspiration for DWeb Camp to the Chaos Communication Camp, the sprawling hacker gathering he first attended in 2003. But his vision was always more focused: an event where technologists could work alongside artists, organizers, and policymakers to imagine and build the infrastructure of a decentralized web.

    “A web that’s more private, more reliable, but still fun,” he said, hopping up and down. “A web with many winners.”

    Collective Intelligence

    At c-base, Kahle and a dozen core organizers didn’t arrive with a finished program. Instead they facilitated breakout conversations, solicited unconference topics, and most importantly, listened.

    Throughout the day, small circles formed across the space station, and similar themes surfaced again and again.

    Not everything, participants suggested, needs to scale to billions of users. Perhaps some of the most important decentralized tools will serve smaller networks—families, communities, groups of collaborators who know one another. An intimate web, as some people called it, rather than the global one.

    Others spoke about shared infrastructure in a broader sense: not just software, but the resources communities could distribute. Buildings. Time. Convenings. Knowledge. The question, several people suggested, was not simply how to build better tools but how to sustain the ecosystems that allow those tools to exist.

    Hölke Brammer, of the Hypercerts Foundation, offered a framework that drew nods around the table.

    “It’s said, first you need the values,” he recited.
    “Then governance.
    Then the right incentives.
    And finally the technology to build it.”

    DWeb Camp tries to bring all of those layers together in the same place at the same time. Which means inviting not just engineers but researchers, economists and storytellers.

    Marek Tuszynski, co-founder of Tactical Tech, offered a wry observation about how the technology world often divides itself.

    “They say technology is inspired in San Francisco,” he recounted. “It’s built in China. And criticized in Europe.”

    The challenge, he suggested, was to move beyond those boxes—to collaborate across them.

    Later, when participants were asked what would make the camp most valuable, one answer surfaced repeatedly.

    “To find the people I want to work with after Camp,” someone said, “and figure out how to keep working together on an on-going basis.”

    Grounded in Place

    Franzi and Marv, two of the stewards of the Alte Holle Collective, share the terrain of the 100,000 sq. meters retreat site.

    DWeb Camp has always been shaped by the places where it occurs.

    When organizers began looking for a European site, they eventually settled on Alte Hölle, a forested property in Brandenburg about an hour southwest of Berlin.

    The decision had as much to do with the people stewarding the land as with the landscape itself.

    In 2021, a collective of friends who met at Chaos Communications Camp purchased the property—once a Stasi recreation site—with the intention of turning it into a long-term gathering place for artists, hackers, and activists.

    Their question was straightforward.

    Why build a camp only to dismantle it a few days later?   Why not create infrastructure that could remain?

    Two of the site’s stewards, Franzi and Marv, joined the gathering at c-base. Rather than simply presenting the site, they participated in the discussions, listening carefully to the people who will soon gather there.

    “We share a lot of the same values,” they said. “We are a volunteer group that supports [you] and is an ally for [your] event.” 

    The goal, for DWeb organizers, is not merely to occupy Alte Hölle but to contribute to it—to plant something, rather than simply passing through.

    The field where some 700+ campers will pitch their tents in Brandenburg.

    Partners with Principles

    Afri of Department of Decentralization demonstrates the programmable badge his team is developing for DWeb Camp. Via radio waves, you will be able to talk person to person at Camp, without going to the cloud or WIFI.

    Strong collaborators don’t just support your vision. They push you to live up to it.

    Berlin’s Department of Decentralization (DoD)—a collective formed after organizing ETHBerlin in 2018—has encouraged DWeb Camp organizers to align our tools more closely with our principles. That means prioritizing open-source infrastructure wherever possible.

    Tickets will be sold through PreTix.
    The schedule will run on PreTalx.
    Collaborative documents will live on CryptPad.
    Camp communications will be via Matrix.

    Tools designed with privacy and security in mind. Not just talking about decentralization, but practicing it.

    Building Across Borders

    Some of the organizers of DWeb Camp from Alte Hölle, Department of Decentralization and the Internet Archive came together at c-base in February to plan for July.

    Based across North America and Europe, the organizers of DWeb Camp 2026 have lineages that span the globe—Nigeria, Russia, Germany, France, Italy, Ukraine, Canada, Japan, and the United States. We come from different political contexts. Different assumptions about technology. Different cultural norms. The challenge–and the promise–is to weave those perspectives into something coherent, yet distinct. 

    Toward the end of the day at c-base, Kahle returned to a theme that was disarmingly simple.

    Welcome.

    “This is a really special community…they welcomed me twenty years ago,” he said. “You may not be aware of the effect you have by saying ‘welcome’ to somebody from a foreign place. I think it is a hallmark of a community that is living and thriving.”

    That small gesture, he suggested, can shape the direction of entire communities. “I hope that DWeb Camp is to your liking, if it’s not, say so, and let’s basically make it better. Let’s build something together.” 

    Because DWeb Camp has never been a finished product.

    It is something closer to a living system. It’s shaped by the people who show up, the relationships they form, and the ideas that take hold.

    And in the forests of Brandenburg this July, those connections—technical, social, and human—will begin to spread beneath the surface.

    Like any root system, their real strength may lie in what we cannot see.

    View the fireside chat with Brewster Kahle and Wendy Hanamura.

  • Doctors lose new jobs package as strike to go ahead

    The offer of 1,000 more training posts has been withdrawn after the union refused to scrap the planned six-day strike.
  • Millions of older people to get vaccine against serious lung infection

    Millions of older people can now get protection against a virus which causes serious lung infections like bronchitis and pneumonia – preventing potentially thousands of hospital admissions a year. All adults aged 80 and over, and people living in a care home for older adults, are now eligible for the NHS respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) […]
  • US Prosecutors Hint at More Charges for Alleged South American Drug Baron Sebastián Marset

    American prosecutors and the defense team for alleged South American druglord Sebastian Marset waived his right to a speedy trial today, while the U.S. government signaled that more charges are likely on the way.

    Marset appeared for his arraignment hearing at the U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia, where he was read the charges against him. He shook hands with his attorneys, up from Miami, and signed a waiver for a guaranteed quick trial.

    A Uruguayan national with operations in Paraguay, the heavily tattooed Marset was arrested in the south of Bolivia in a surprise early morning raid on March 13. He was promptly extradited to the U.S., having his first formal hearing on March 20th.

    Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. told Marset, wearing a dark green prison jumpsuit and white sneakers, that he faced up to 20 years in a U.S. prison, followed by three years of supervised release, if convicted of conspiracy to commit money laundering. He may also be fined no less than $500,000.

    Prosecutor Anthony T. Aminoff, who heads his district’s narcotics and money laundering unit, told the judge that the two parties wanted a status conference delayed until May 20. In a status conference, both sides report to the judge on progress as the case readies for trial. 

    Aminoff said the extra time was needed to continue negotiations because a superseding indictment “is likely.”

    A superseding indictment augments the existing indictment and typically adds charges. The announcement is significant because it means Marset, 34, could be charged with drug trafficking or other penalties more serious than the current money laundering charges for moving money through US banks

    The current indictment refers repeatedly to drug trafficking activity, but does not charge him with trafficking itself.

    Described as “a most-wanted fugitive throughout the Southern Cone of South America,” Marset had a $2 million U.S. government bounty on him before his capture.

    The U.S. State Department said a multinational law enforcement investigation had “linked a criminal network led by Marset to more than 16 tons of cocaine seized in Europe.”

    Marset faces charges in Paraguay for international drug trafficking, criminal association and money laundering. Uruguayan police have linked him to criminal enterprises there but have not yet presented formal changes.

    In their indictment, federal prosecutors in Virginia allege he ran a narcotics organization that moved “thousands of kilograms of cocaine, including as many as 10 tons at a time, from South America typically to Europe.”

    Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Brazil, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal were among the countries listed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office as trafficking targets. 

    The high-profile Uruguayan’s arrest and extradition to the U.S. came after renewed regional anti-narcotics cooperation, just months after the Drug Enforcement Administration resumed operations in Bolivia following a 17-year absence. The operation came after Bolivia’s participation in a March 7 anti-narcotics summit convened by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

  • New BVI Transparency Rules Have Fatal Flaws, Anti-Corruption Advocates Warn

    The British Virgin Islands cracked open Wednesday its corporate secrecy regime that has made it a go-to jurisdiction for tax evaders and other financial criminals — but there’s a catch.

    Breaking with its decades-long policy of total secrecy, BVI authorities may now direct company services agents to provide corporate information upon reviewing requests.

    However, the new regulations stipulate that a company’s registered agent must be notified whenever authorities receive such a request. 

    Anti-corruption groups say this ruins the element of surprise, acting as an early warning system for bad actors while exposing the identities of the people investigating them — including journalists, and transparency advocates.

    “A register that notifies company owners when their information is accessed is not compatible with global transparency efforts,” said Margot Mollat senior researcher at the U.K. chapter of the anti-corruption group Transparency International.

    “It will put journalists and civil society actors at serious risk of retaliation and legal intimidation, which in turn will have a chilling effect on any public interest reporting,” she told OCCRP.

    Some in the legal industry have defended the new framework as a necessary compromise. 

    Ogier Global Law Firm, which advises clients on BVI law, explained in a briefing that the update “represents a significant shift in corporate transparency, evolving from a system once reserved strictly for law enforcement into a more balanced model that aligns with modern international standards.”

    Noting that the law aims to protect individual privacy, the firm added: ”This means transparency will only be used where necessary.”

    To gain access, an applicant must pay a $75 fee and show credible evidence that their inquiry serves the public interest, such as preventing financial crime. The government will only disclose information for individuals holding at least a 25 percent stake in the business. The applicant can then see the owner’s full legal name, nationality, birth month and year, and specific level of control.

    The system includes what Ogier described as “robust check and balances to protect individuals from unnecessary exposure.” 

    Once a company is notified of a data request, it has five business days to formally object. That can trigger an appeals process that freezes the release of data, according to the new regulations enacted by authorities in BVI, which is a self-governing British Overseas Territory.

    Companies can also apply for advance privacy exemptions if disclosure would expose owners to serious risks like kidnapping, extortion, or violence.

    Advocacy groups say the new regulations allow too much leeway for companies to continue to hide information from the public.  

    “Companies registered in these Overseas Territories have been used to hide billions of pounds from corruption and embezzlement, avoid sanctions, or launder money linked to drugs, human trafficking and illegal deforestation,” said Mollat of Transparency International. 

    “Genuine beneficial ownership disclosure should empower investigators to detect these suspicious activities, not create bureaucratic barriers that protect those with something to hide or tips them off so they can move their assets,” she added.

    While transparency advocates view this warning window as a dangerous loophole, BVI Financial Services Commission documents reveal the massive offshore industry actually fought for an even longer 10 to 21-day objection period, citing widespread concerns over media access.