Author: tio

  • Turkey Detains Bursa Mayor in Corruption Probe

    Turkish authorities detained Bursa Metropolitan Mayor Mustafa Bozbey Tuesday along with 54 other suspects in coordinated raids across five provinces, escalating pressure on opposition-run municipalities and setting off an immediate political fight in one of the country’s biggest industrial centers. Prosecutors said 59 people were targeted in the operation and that four suspects remained at large.

    The Bursa Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office said the case centers on Bozbey’s earlier years as mayor of Nilüfer, a district within Bursa. According to the prosecutor’s account, investigators concluded that Bozbey, former Nilüfer Mayor Turgay Erdem and some municipal employees arranged improper construction-related floor-area increases in exchange for bribes, generating financial benefits for themselves and for project owners. 

    The allegations include forming and leading a criminal organization, membership in a criminal organization, bribery, laundering criminal proceeds and causing zoning pollution. Searches were carried out at dozens of homes, companies and other addresses linked to the suspects.

    Bozbey won Bursa’s mayoralty in the March 31, 2024 local elections, giving the main opposition Republican People’s Party, or CHP, control of Turkey’s fourth-largest city. 

    Tuesday’s detention therefore landed as both a criminal case and a political shock. Turkish outlet T24 reported that attention quickly turned to the balance of power in the Bursa municipal council and to who could control the city if Bozbey is formally suspended, as often happens in such cases.

    Opposition politicians responded by framing the operation as selective justice rather than a neutral anti-corruption drive. CHP Deputy Chair Gökhan Günaydın, writing on X, asked: “Is there an AKP mayor raided at dawn?” Gazete Oksijen and other Turkish outlets also quoted party officials calling the detention a “political operation.” 

    CHP Deputy Chair Gökan Zeybek went further, saying the government was trying to obtain “through the judiciary” what it had not won at the ballot box. 

    Another party statement said, in effect, that the authorities were targeting the will of Bursa’s voters rather than simply investigating old municipal decisions.

  • UK Jails Two in Facebook Boat-Smuggling Ring

    A U.K. court has sentenced two Vietnamese nationals to more than a decade in prison each for running a lucrative people-smuggling operation advertised on Facebook. Hop Nguyen, 36, received a 12-year sentence, while Hoang Nguyen, 25, was sentenced to 10 and a half years. Both men, who pleaded guilty in August, also face deportation.

    Operating from January 2023 until their arrest in April 2024, the pair helped at least 250 migrants enter the U.K. via small boat crossings. By charging approximately 3,000 British pounds ($3,963) per person, they generated nearly 750,000 pounds ($990,848) in profit. Crown Prosecution Service officials described the pair as part of an international organized crime network attempting to undermine the country’s borders.

  • How India’s Ruling Party is Using AI to Boost Hate Speech in States Near Bangladesh

    How India’s Ruling Party is Using AI to Boost Hate Speech in States Near Bangladesh

    The video posted by a state branch of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) showed Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma shooting an image of two men in Muslim skull caps. “Foreigner-free Assam”, read one caption across the video. “Why did you not go to Pakistan?” said another. 

    Screenshots of the now-deleted video shared by BJP on Feb. 7 showing Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma shooting an AI-generated version of INC leader Gaurav Gogoi (in a white skull cap) and another unidentified, bearded man. Source: BJP4Assam/X

    One of the men in the photo that Sarma was portrayed as shooting was Gaurav Gogoi, a leader of the Indian National Congress (INC), the BJP’s main competitor in Assam for the state’s upcoming legislative elections next month

    Gogoi has stated that he is Hindu but enjoys visiting different religious sites and observing their norms. He has been photographed wearing traditional Muslim attire during religious occasions such as Eid

    But the image of him in the video shared by BJP Assam, wearing a casual singlet with a skull cap, was not one of those occasions. 

    Bellingcat has seen several dozen videos posted by the BJP that use generative artificial intelligence (AI) alongside anti-Muslim and anti-Bangladeshi messaging in the border states of Assam and West Bengal in December last year, ahead of legislative elections scheduled in both states for April.

    Left: Original photo shared by Gogoi on Jun. 17, 2025. Right: An image shared by BJP Assam that was edited with AI to show Gogoi with a skull cap, beard and Quran. Source: gauravgogoiasm/Facebook, BJP4Bengal/Facebook

    Bellingcat analysed 499 social media posts containing photos and videos shared on Facebook, Instagram and X by the BJP’s official accounts in the two states for this time period, finding 194 posts that appeared to meet the United Nations’ definition of hate speech: discriminating against persons or communities based on inherent characteristics such as religion and national origin. Of these, 31 (about one in six of the hateful posts) contained the obvious use of AI-generated imagery. 

    Chart: Galen Reich

    These appear to be part of a larger pattern of politicians and parties globally using generative AI to amplify hateful or divisive content, particularly ahead of major political events such as elections. 

    Ahead of the New York City mayoral race last year, Andrew Cuomo’s official X account shared, then deleted, an AI-generated video depicting Mamdani eating rice with his hands and a Black man in a keffiyeh shoplifting. In Italy, several opposition parties complained to a communications watchdog after deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini’s League party published a series of AI-generated images depicting men of colour attacking women or police officers. And in the UK, videos by an AI-generated rapper funded by the far-right Advance UK party, with lyrics targeting Muslims, were viewed millions of times. 

    A Campaign of Hate

    Both Assam and West Bengal share a border with Bangladesh. BJP, the world’s largest political party, is currently in power in Assam, where legislative elections are scheduled on Apr. 9. West Bengal, which goes to the polls on Apr. 23, is governed by the Trinamool Congress (TMC).

    Map: Pooja Chaudhuri. Source: Goran tek-en, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 

    Tensions between India and Bangladesh worsened after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who enjoys close ties with Delhi, was ousted in 2024 and fled to India

    US-based international affairs expert Mohammed Zeeshan told Bellingcat that the “dehumanising and debasing” terminology used in India to refer to alleged illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, including by senior ministers, has caused resentment towards India in Bangladesh. 

    “The situation, in fact, was so bad that Hasina herself had subtly warned the Modi government in public statements that Indian domestic rhetoric was endangering Bangladeshi Hindus, who bore the brunt of that resentment,” Zeeshan said. 

    Related articles by Bellingcat

    The Fall of Sheikh Hasina: Footage from the Streets of Bangladesh

    The Fall of Sheikh Hasina: Footage from the Streets of Bangladesh

    Zobaida Nasreen, a professor of anthropology at Dhaka University, said that anti-Muslim rhetoric intensified by BJP leaders reinforces the belief in Bangladesh that Muslims and Bengalis are being collectively targeted in India.

    “Viral videos containing this message tend to spread quickly across Bangladeshi media and social platforms especially on Facebook, enhancing perceptions of hostility and triggering anti-India sentiment or nationalist backlash,” she added.

    In December, the month our dataset was collected, Dipu Das, a Hindu garment worker, was beaten to death at an anti-India protest in Bangladesh over allegations that he had made derogatory remarks about Islam. 

    And while the administration led by Bangladesh’s newly elected leader Tarique Rahman has sought to reset strained ties, most of the hateful social media posts we saw posted by the BJP in December attacked Bangladeshi Muslims and/or Bengali-origin Muslims in India, showing how tensions between the two countries continue to influence political messaging in India’s border states.

    Bellingcat’s analysis included a total of 202 posts by BJP Assam and 297 by BJP’s West Bengal branch on their official accounts. We also looked at posts shared by BJP’s main opponent parties – 194 from INC in Assam and 357 from the TMC in West Bengal – during the same time period in December. 

    This included all visual social media posts (containing photos or videos) by each party in December, except those that did not appear to contain any overt political messaging, such as those simply commemorating public holidays. We only counted each photo or video once, regardless of how many platforms it was shared across. 

    Although all of the major parties contesting in the Assam and West Bengal state elections appeared to use AI-generated imagery in some of their posts, there appeared to be a particularly high concentration of hateful messaging in the ones posted by the BJP’s accounts. 

    In Assam, we identified 28 posts by BJP using apparently AI-generated imagery, of which 24 carried hateful messaging. Of the 194 INC posts we looked at from December, 41 appeared to feature AI-generated imagery, but none of these appeared to carry hateful messaging. 

    In West Bengal, we found 14 BJP posts that contained clear indicators of AI-generated imagery, seven of which were hateful. We also identified 15 posts by the incumbent TMC that appeared to feature AI imagery, but none of these appeared to meet the definition of hate speech. 

    Support Bellingcat

    Your donations directly contribute to our ability to publish groundbreaking investigations and uncover wrongdoing around the world.

    When contacted for comment, BJP Assam spokesperson Rupam Goswami did not directly respond to questions on the party’s general use of AI but said they did not post any AI-generated photos of Gogoi. “BJP does not stoop so low,” he told Bellingcat.

    As for the “point blank” shooting video, Goswami initially said the person responsible had been punished and removed from the party. However, when asked about Sarma saying that he would re-post the video with those he was depicted shooting labelled as “Bangladeshis”, Goswami said, “[Bangladeshis] need to be completely suppressed.”

    BJP West Bengal did not respond to multiple requests for comment by Bellingcat via phone and email.

    It is important to note that as generative AI technology improves, it can be increasingly difficult to detect AI-generated imagery. Our manual count of AI-generated imagery only included posts that had obvious signs of generative AI such as unnaturally smooth textures and multiple people with the same faces. It is therefore possible that there were other images in our dataset where generative AI was used more subtly. 

    However, Joyojeet Pal, Professor of Information at the University of Michigan, told Bellingcat that the quality of these visuals, or whether they looked real, was not the priority. 

    “What politicians in India have understood is that the sociocultural drivers of misinformation are most important for elections, so they harp on about things to the extent that they have started to not care about form over substance. It looks bad? It doesn’t matter,” he said.

    More important to voters, according to Pal, was whether they already believed in the narrative contained in the videos, which generative AI could help create more quickly: “AI is helping cement polarised opinions by giving you the kind of content you have already decided you want to engage with.” 

    When asked about INC’s use of AI, party spokesperson Aman Wadud said that it was obvious that some of the videos they posted were made with AI and that there was no intention to mislead. 

    “AI can be both destructive and creative. We are using it in a creative manner, we are not using it in a destructive manner. We don’t violate people’s dignity, we don’t falsely accuse people,” he said.

    TMC did not respond to Bellingcat’s multiple requests for comment via phone and email by publication time.

    Portraying Bengali Muslims as ‘Foreigners’

    The largest category of hateful messaging Bellingcat observed in the BJP’s posts targeted Bangladeshi or Bengali-origin Muslims, referring to them as “infiltrators” or “foreigners”. We counted 66 such posts by the BJP’s Assam and West Bengal branches from December, of which eight appeared to contain obvious AI-generated imagery. 

    Bengali-origin Muslims are often stereotyped as “illegal immigrants” in the state, although members of the community have lived in India since the late 1800s

    Last year, the BJP deported thousands of alleged undocumented migrants – reportedly including Indian Muslim citizens – to Bangladesh. Human rights groups have called the deportations unlawful and discriminatory, as well as lacking in due process

    One video referencing this theme shows AI-generated visuals of protests against “illegal infiltration” in Assam, with the caption urging people to “wake up” or the country would “turn into Bangladesh”. 

    A different one uses real footage from past violence in Assam mixed in with images of Muslim men. A song playing in the background accuses them of taking over “Assamese land” and shows AI images of “Assamese” people, i.e. those not in stereotypical Muslim clothing, crying.

    An AI-generated image of a crying man in non-Muslim clothing and a traditional Assamese scarf on his shoulders. Source: BJP4Assam/X

    Both videos use religious markers to draw a distinction between “infiltrators” – men in skull caps or lungis associated with Bengal-origin Muslims – and “citizens” in non-Muslim attire. 

    Clothing is often used by the Hindu far-right as a visual shorthand for identity and a deepening religious divide. In 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said of protests against a controversial citizenship law that those responsible for violence could be “identified by their clothes”

    In the hateful posts seen by Bellingcat, both real and AI-generated images of opposition figures – particularly Gogoi – were shown alongside messaging that suggested that they supported “foreigners” or “infiltrators”. 

    The Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH) also noted, in a 2025 report on AI-generated imagery and Islomophobia in India, that Hindu far-right politicians and media outlets have invoked and reinforced the trope of Muslims as “infiltrators” for years. 

    “AI-generated images on these themes reinforce associations between Muslim identity and illegality, reinforcing xenophobic and Islamophobic stereotypes. In doing so, they play a powerful role in justifying exclusionary policies and normalising discrimination against Muslims,” the report said. 

    ‘Save Hindus’

    Zenith Khan, a data analyst who worked on the CSOH report, noted that AI-generated propaganda was often tightly knit with current political moments, and its impact depended on “timing it right” especially when “people are emotionally charged”. 

    The violence against the minority Hindu community in Bangladesh has been used by the BJP to raise concerns over the safety of Hindus in India. 

    Days after Das’ lynching, the Assam state branch of BJP posted a video with an image of his face – except that it was manipulated with AI to show tears streaming from his eyes. “Save Hindus”, said the text accompanying the video. 

    Posts by BJP’s West Bengal unit also seemed to frame Muslims as criminals or threats. A video, styled after the TV show “Stranger Things”, raised alarms over an “upside down” version of the state under the current government. 

    A man is depicted being chased by men in skull caps. Arrows label them as “Ralib,” “Galib,” and “Chalib” – a play on Muslim names ending in “-lib” – in case the skull caps left any ambiguity about their Muslim portrayal. 

    “Stranger Things” themed post that depicts Hindus under threat from Muslims in West Bengal. Source: BJP4Bengal/X

    INC filed a police complaint in September last year against the BJP for sharing AI videos targeting Gogoi and the Muslim community, as well as another complaint in relation to the video of Sarma portrayed as shooting two men “point blank” in February. 

    INC Assam spokesperson Wadud said that no action had been taken on the party’s police complaints as far as he knew. 

    Disinformation researcher Bharat Nayak told Bellingcat that it has always been tech platforms’ responsibility to control new types of content. 

    “The goal post can’t shift. This has always been a tech problem,” he said. 

    When this responsibility is shrugged off, Nayak added, the result is a lack of accountability. “If you’re using old videos from other countries as new, you will have people countering you. But AI-generated videos can be shared without context just to spread hate – like showing people in skull caps – and the ‘when, where, how’ questions vanish.”

    Both Meta – which owns Facebook and Instagram – and X have policies against hateful conduct. 

    Meta also announced in 2024 that it would start adding “AI info” labels to more content detected as AI-generated, while some X users spotted a similar feature introduced on the platform last month. Only five of INC’s AI visuals that we identified – and none of those by TMC or the BJP – had a disclaimer that said “AI-generated”. 

    Bellingcat reached out to Meta and X for comment on whether the posts we identified breached their terms of use regarding hateful conduct or labelling AI-generated posts. A Meta spokesperson said they were reviewing the flagged content and “will take appropriate action on any violations of our policies”. As of publication, X had not responded.


    Kalim Ahmed from Bellingcat’s Discord Community contributed research to this piece.

    Bellingcat is a non-profit and the ability to carry out our work is dependent on the kind support of individual donors. If you would like to support our work, you can do so here. You can also subscribe to our Patreon channel here. Subscribe to our Newsletter and follow us on Bluesky here, Instagram here, Reddit here and YouTube here.

    The post How India’s Ruling Party is Using AI to Boost Hate Speech in States Near Bangladesh appeared first on bellingcat.

  • Equal Rights Beyond Borders

    Equal Rights Beyond Borders is a charitable organization, founded in 2016, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, and Athens, Greece, with additional offices on the Greek islands Chios and Kos. The organization provides free legal assistance to refugees and asylum seekers in its offices in Athens, Kos, and Chios, including support in asylum procedures, Dublin family reunification, and detention-related cases.

  • MIDDLE EAST LIVE: Vital food aid blocked, aid agencies warn over Sudan fallout

    More than a month since war erupted in the Middle East, UN agencies confirmed on Tuesday that huge numbers of people have returned to Syria from Lebanon “exhausted, traumatized and with very, very few belongings”. Meanwhile, the UN International Maritime Organization said that another vessel has been attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, increasing concerns of further delays in getting lifesaving aid to desperately vulnerable people in conflict settings including Sudan. Stay with us for live updates on this and UN agencies. App users can follow coverage here
  • MIDDLE EAST LIVE: Vital food aid blocked, Security Council meets in emergency session on Lebanon

    More than a month since war erupted in the Middle East, UN agencies confirmed on Tuesday that huge numbers of people have returned to Syria from Lebanon “exhausted, traumatized and with very, very few belongings”. Meanwhile, the UN International Maritime Organization said that another vessel has been attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, increasing concerns of further delays in transporting lifesaving aid. The Security Council met in New York in emergency session on Lebanon. Stay with us for live updates. App users can follow coverage here
  • Syria: Hundreds of thousands flee Lebanon, vital food aid blocked

    The trauma of mass displacement and disruption to aid shipments throughout the world are among the devastating impacts of the war raging in the Middle East, UN agencies said on Tuesday.
  • Lebanon at ‘breaking point’ as displacement soars and strikes intensify

    The UN’s top humanitarian official warned the Security Council on Tuesday that Lebanon is facing one of its most dangerous moments in years, with escalating violence, mass displacement and deepening human suffering pushing the country to “breaking point”.
  • Hotline to the Kremlin: How Hungary Colluded With Russia to Weaken EU Sanctions

    An hour after Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó returned to Budapest from St. Petersburg on August 30, 2024, he received a phone call from his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov.

    Lavrov told Szijjártó he had been quoted all over the Russian media following his visit.

    “Did I say something wrong?” Szijjártó asked.

    “No, no, no.” Lavrov reassured him. “They were just saying that you are pragmatically fighting for the interests of your country.”

    In fact, Lavrov was calling to make a request: The Russian oligarch Alisher Usmanov was looking to have his sister, Gulbahor Ismailova, removed from EU sanctions lists, and Szijjártó had promised to help.

    “I’m calling on the request of Alisher and he just asked me to remind you that you were doing something about his sister,” Lavrov said.

    “Yeah, absolutely,” Szijjártó answered. “The thing is the following: Together with the Slovaks we are submitting a proposal to the European Union to delist her. We will submit it next week, and as the new review period is going to be started, it’s gonna be put on the agenda and we will do our best in order to get her off.”

    Lavrov expressed his appreciation for Szijjártó’s “support and … fight for equality in all fields.”

    From there conversation proceeded to the two men’s shared disdain of the European Union and its officials. Before hanging up, the Hungarian praised the new Gazprom headquarters he’d visited in Russia. “I am always at your disposal,” he added.

    Seven months later, Ismailova was removed from the EU sanctions list.

    This call between the two foreign ministers was one of several that took place between 2023 and 2025. Audio recordings of Szijjártó’s conversations with Lavrov, as well as other Russian officials, were obtained by reporters from VSquare, FRONTSTORY, Delfi Estonia, The Insider, and the Investigative Center of Ján Kuciak (ICJK). Reporters confirmed the content independently with intelligence sources in multiple countries and consulted on the authenticity of the audio with external experts.

    The calls highlight the exceeding comity between Szijjártó, who represents an EU and NATO member, and Lavrov, who represents a nation that has invaded a European country and sponsored acts of arson and sabotage against NATO’s eastern flank. 

    The two men’s conversations traffic in sensitive information about the internal deliberations of both Budapest and Brussels, which are doubtless of interest to the Kremlin. They also provide clearcut evidence of Russia’s role in prodding Hungary and Slovakia to soften EU sanctions against Russian individuals and entities.

    In his exchanges with Lavrov, Szijjártó comes across as deferential, at times bordering on obsequious. “If you remove names and show these conversations to any case officer, he will swear that this is a transcript of an intelligence officer working his asset,” said a senior European intelligence officer after reviewing the transcripts.

    Neither Lavrov nor Szijjártó replied to requests for comment. Usmanov’s German lawyer, Joachim Nikolaus Steinhöfel, declined to answer questions about the discussion between Lavrov and Szijjártó. He described EU sanctions against Usmanov and his relatives as “unjustified,” stressed his success as a businessman and philanthropist, and emphasized that Usmanov had won “over twenty court cases” against “media outlets, public figures, and politicians who disseminated various false statements about him … many of [which] echoed the very reasonings used for the EU sanctions.”

    Szijjártó’s communications go far beyond Usmanov and his relatives. In a call with another Russian official, Deputy Energy Minister Pavel Sorokin, in the summer of 2025, Szijjártó not only says he has already diluted the EU’s 18th sanctions package, then under negotiation — he asks for additional talking points that would make his efforts appear to be in the interest of Hungary rather than Russia.

    “I have already removed 72 [entities] from the list, but there were 128. I’m trying to continue, but I have to say that this is in the interest of Hungary,” Szijjártó says.

    “If they [Sorokin’s staff] can help me identify the direct and negative effects on Hungary, I would be very grateful,” he adds, “because if I can show something like that, you would give me a completely different opportunity.”

    Szijjártó’s willingness to act in Russia’s interests at the EU level helps explain why Moscow is investing significant effort in keeping Viktor Orbán and his pro-Kremlin Fidesz party in power in Hungary.

    Independent polling suggests Orbán is trailing badly ahead of the April 12 parliamentary election, with the center-right Tisza party, led by challenger Péter Magyar, holding a strong lead.

    As Orbán’s campaign struggles, Russia is reportedly stepping in to assist. As VSquare reported earlier this month, the Kremlin has assigned Sergey Kiriyenko — a deputy chief of staff to Putin and a key architect of Russia’s political influence operations — to covertly support Orbán’s campaign. Kiriyenko previously played an integral role in shaping election interference activities in Moldova.

    At the same time, Orbán’s campaign has increasingly echoed Kremlin narratives, staging provocations against Ukraine and accusing opposition figures and critics of acting as Ukrainian proxies or spies while dismissing allegations of Orbán’s own ties to Russia.

    The calls show that Szijjártó routinely kept Lavrov informed of supposedly confidential discussions by European diplomats.

    For instance, in the same August 30, 2024 call with Lavrov, Szijjártó revealed details of a EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting that he had participated in the day before.

    “That was crazy, you know, when [Lithuanian foreign minister Gabrielius] Landsbergis said that we contribute 12 percent of each rockets and missiles,” Szijjártó told Lavrov, referring to the minister’s argument that Hungarian and Slovak gas and oil payments were helping finance Russia’s war on Ukraine.

    “I said, my friend, you are not right, because the Europeans contribute much more … it’s not only the Slovaks and us who are buying gas and oil from Russia directly but all of you who are buying the same from them through … India, Kazakhstan.” 

    When reached for comment, Landsbergis confirmed that this conversation had taken place.

    “It seems that all this time Putin had, and still has, a mole in all European and NATO official meetings,” he said. “If the integrity of these meetings is to be maintained, it would be appropriate to ban Hungary from all of them.”

    “Every generation has a Kim Philby,” Landsbergis said, referring to the notorious KGB spy in the British Secret Intelligence Service. “Apparently Péter Szijjártó is playing the role with enthusiasm.”

    Hungary’s Leverage

    While the EU has sanctioned some 2,700 Russian citizens and entities due to their role in enabling Russia’s war on Ukraine, the bloc must vote every six months on whether to extend those sanctions. 

    These decisions are made by consensus, meaning all 27 member states must agree. 

    RFE/RL reported in March 2025 that Hungary and Slovakia threatened to block the extension of EU sanctions that month unless certain names were removed. It wasn’t just Ismailova: Russian businessman Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor and the country’s sports minister, Mikhail Degtyaryov, were also unsanctioned during that round.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity in order to be able to reveal inside details, a European diplomat closely involved in the negotiations said that Hungary and Slovakia usually begin with a lengthy list of Russian names they want delisted. 

    “They don’t use legal arguments,” the diplomat explained. “They just say they don’t want those people on the sanctions list for political reasons.”

    As negotiations progress, Budapest and Bratislava usually whittle their list down to a handful of people, as was the case with Ismailova, Kantor, and Degtyaryov.

    While it had long been suspected that Hungary and Slovakia leak the details of these negotiations to Moscow, the diplomat described newly obtained hard evidence as valuable: “Hungary is clearly fulfilling political orders from Russia,” they said when reporters showed them the transcripts.

    ‘No clear Hungarian interest’

    Economic relief for individuals isn’t the only case in which Hungary secretly acted on the Kremlin’s behalf in Brussels.

    In conversations with another high-ranking Russian official, Deputy Energy Minister Pavel Sorokin, Szijjártó said that he was doing his best to “repeal” a crucial EU sanctions package targeting Russia’s shadow fleet of oil tankers — the means by which Moscow evades Western energy sanctions.

    In one conversation with Sorokin, Szijjártó offered to remove Russian banks proposed for designation by the EU. He even asked the Russian to provide him with arguments as to why doing so would be in Hungary’s interest.

    In another call, Szijjártó complained that the EU refused to share with him documents related to the proposed sanctioning of 2Rivers, a Dubai-based company trading in Russian oil.

    “They say that there is no clear Hungarian interest that they can identify, and therefore Hungary cannot legally ask them to be removed from the list,” Szijjártó said after Sorokin asked why Budapest had been cut out of the loop.

    According to the EU, 2Rivers, formerly known as Coral Energy, has been a key player in selling Russian oil via its own shadow fleet of tankers and concealing the origin of crude from Russian state energy giant Rosneft, now under U.S. sanctions. 2Rivers then sells the crude above the internationally capped oil price and feeds Russia’s war machine with vital revenue. In December 2024, the UK sanctioned 2Rivers and its oil trading network.

    It is unclear what interest Hungary — a landlocked country that receives oil through pipelines — could have in trying to preserve Russia’s shadow fleet operations. But the benefit to Russia is obvious.

    After reporting that he was unsuccessful with 2Rivers, Szijjártó shared details with Sorokin about then-ongoing negotiations on the EU’s 18th sanctions package.

    He explained that the vote was not yet on the agenda thanks to a postponement arranged by Hungary and Slovakia until the EU agreed to “make an exception” for those countries to “allow us to continue buying Russian gas and oil.”

    The 18th sanctions package was proposed by the European Commission on June 10, 2025. Two weeks later, Szijjártó announced publicly that Hungary and Slovakia were blocking it “in response to European Union plans to phase out Russian energy imports.”

    It was in a call with Sorokin a week later that Szijjártó asked for talking points about “negative effects on Hungary” to help him dilute the package.

    Kinga Redłowska, a leading sanctions expert and the Head of CFS Europe at the London-based think tank RUSI, said Hungary’s approach serves a dual purpose.

    “Domestically, it allows Viktor Orbán to reinforce an anti-Ukrainian narrative,” she said. “At the EU level, it provides leverage to extract concessions in unrelated areas, such as EU funding or rule-of-law disputes.”

    But while this strategy may help Orbán’s government, enabling an aggressive neighbor to capture and hold more sovereign European land runs counter to Hungary’s national interest, she said: “Weakening sanctions risks bolstering Russia’s war economy, undermining the broader security interests of all EU member states, including Hungary itself.”

    The conversations between Szijjártó and Sorokin also touched on Russian banks that were in the EU’s crosshairs.

    “[S]hare the names of those banks with me, I can check if they are on the list or not, I’ll check the legal grounds and then I’ll do my best,” Szijjártó told Sorokin. “I know they want to put Sankt Petersburg Bank on the list, which I managed to remove; they also wanted to put another bank related to the Paks [nuclear power plant] project on the list, and I managed to remove it.”

    After weeks of delays by Hungary and Slovakia, the European Union finally adopted the 18th sanctions package on July 18, 2025. 2Rivers was included on the list, prompting it to begin dissolving. The package also dealt a significant blow to Russia’s shadow fleet and its efforts to circumvent oil sanctions.

    However, it remains unclear how much greater the impact might have been without Szijjártó’s efforts. By that time, his close relationship with Russia had already been made public.

    In April 2025, the Polish weekly Polityka reported that Szijjártó was suspected of sharing written notes from EU ministerial meetings with Russia. Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that Szijjártó has been regularly sharing information over the phone with Lavrov during breaks in EU talks. “Every single EU meeting for years has basically had Moscow behind the table,” a European security official told the Post.

    Politico reported earlier this month that “the EU is limiting the flow of confidential material to Hungary and leaders are meeting in smaller groups.”

    Hungary’s government dismissed such reports as “pro-Ukrainian propaganda,” while Szijjártó, while acknowledigng his frequent communication with Lavrov, called stories about his actions “fake news.”

    This strategy appears to be backfiring. Szijjártó was recently booed by protesters, who shouted “traitor” and “Russian spy” at a campaign event.

    Hungary’s interference in EU sanctions policy began within months of Russia’s full-scale invasion, hardening over the ensuing four years into a systematic lobbying effort for Kremlin-linked figures that was joined by Slovakia.

    In June 2022, Hungary held up the entire sixth EU sanctions package — which included the landmark partial Russian oil embargo — until Patriarch Kirill, a former KGB agent and the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, was stripped from the list. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán personally intervened on the grounds of “religious freedom.”

    In February 2025, Hungary extracted another Kirill exemption during negotiations on the 16th package, as well as saving the Russian Olympic Committee and two Russian football clubs.

    In February 2026, Hungary vetoed the entire 20th sanctions package outright — the first time Budapest had gone that far — blocking new restrictive measures that had been intended to mark the fourth anniversary of the invasion, citing a dispute over oil flows through the Druzhba pipeline.

    In March 2026, Slovakia threatened to veto the six-month renewal of the entire existing individual sanctions list unless Usmanov and another Russian oligarch, Mikhail Fridman, were immediately removed, before executing what EU diplomats called one of the strangest U-turns they had witnessed, backing down without securing either removal; Hungary likewise dropped its list of seven targets.

  • Nepal’s Top Court Keeps Ex-PM Oli in Custody Amid Protest Probe

    Nepal’s Supreme Court on Monday declined to release former Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli and former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak following two separate petitions alleging their detention was illegal.

    The petitions were filed Sunday, claiming that the arrests were unlawful after police took the former ministers into custody from their homes on Saturday morning. They face criminal negligence charges related to the deadly crackdown on last year’s Gen Z protests.

    Authorities said the arrests were carried out under emergency warrants issued by the government. 

    Supreme Court spokesperson Arjun Prasad Koirala told OCCRP that the court has ordered the government to submit a written response “explaining the circumstances and reasons for issuing an emergency arrest warrant within three days.” 

    Oli served as prime minister four times and is chair of the Communist Party of Nepal—Unified Marxist–Leninist (UML). Despite his government’s collapse following mass protests, he was elected in December to a third term as the party’s chair.

    Hundreds of members of Oli’s party, along with its sister organizations and student wings, have staged regular protests in Kathmandu’s Maitighar-Babarmahal area following the arrests.

    On Sunday, the Kathmandu District Court remanded Oli and Lekhak to judicial custody for five days. Meanwhile, the party’s district committees submitted memoranda to the government demanding their immediate release.

    “What we have done so far is to implement various reports. Everything is in accordance with the law,” government spokesperson Sasmita Pokhrel told journalists after the cabinet meeting on Monday.

    Last week, a high-level commission investigating the violent suppression of 2025’s Gen Z uprising recommended criminal prosecution against the former prime minister and top security officials. 

    Lekhak remains in police detention, while Oli has been admitted to the hospital due to heart issues. 

    The former prime minister also faces separate legal troubles regarding a corruption probe. Nepal’s Department of Money Laundering Investigation has launched an inquiry into three former prime ministers and two former ministers for alleged money laundering offenses.

    “We have received some complaints against former prime ministers and are in the preliminary phase of inquiry,” Jitendra Adhikari, a director at the Department of Money Laundering Investigation, told OCCRP. 

    In addition to Oli, those under investigation include former prime ministers Sher Bahadur Deuba and Pushpa Kamal Dahal, as well as former ministers Arzu Rana Deuba and Deepak Khadka, the local newspaper Kathmandu Post reported. Nepali Police arrested Congress leader and former Energy Minister Deepak Khadka on Sunday.

    “There are complaints concerning former prime ministers, and inquiries are ongoing. The Central Investigation Bureau (CIB)  is providing operational and investigative support to the DMLI as required,” CIB chief Manoj Kumar K.C. told OCCRP.

    The wave of arrests follows Friday’s inauguration of Balendra “Balen” Shah, a 35-year-old rapper, as Nepal’s new prime minister. The Shah administration has unveiled an ambitious 100-point work plan for effective governance.

    According to the plan, a high-level Asset Investigation Committee will be established under the Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers within 15 days. In its first phase, the committee will collect, verify, and investigate the asset details of major political figures and high-ranking officials who have held public office over the last 20 years.

    Balendra Shah’s Rastriya Swotantra Party won a landslide victory in March over four-time Prime Minister Oli, months after anti-corruption protests toppled the previous government.