Author: tio

  • Rehab by Force in the Middle of a Cartel War

    Nicolás Pérez drives his pickup through dimly lit streets in central Mexico. Five men are in the back. They are on a “spiritual mission,” he says, looking for people struggling with methamphetamine addiction to force into treatment at his rehabilitation center.

    The truck stops at an abandoned house. The men get out, slip under a fence and enter. Seconds later, a shout is heard from the upper floor, and the tallest of the group escorts out a much smaller man, who is pleading in vain. They want to lock him up in rehab at La Sagrada Familia (The Holy Family), the center that Pérez has directed for 20 years in Silao, the heart of Guanajuato state.

    “What we do is based on trial and error,” Pérez says. “Maybe when he gets out he’ll [use drugs] again. Maybe so, but we’ve already helped extend his life a little. We have the advantage that there’s a chance he’ll be rehabilitated.”

    Men from La Sagrada Familia inspect an abandoned building where a methamphetamine user slept in Silao, Guanajuato, Mexico, on 16 January 2026. (Credit: Diego Legrand)

    La Sagrada Familia is an anexo, a type of informal rehabilitation center in Mexico that exists because there is almost no public residential drug treatment. They have proliferated in this part of the country in response to a cartel-driven methamphetamine addiction crisis. There are now at least 520 anexos in Guanajuato and roughly 3,000 across Mexico, but without a formal registration system, it is impossible to know the exact number.

    Largely unregulated, anexos are often criticized for harsh or even abusive methods, poor hygiene, and a lack of trained staff. Some have even been infiltrated by the drug-selling cartels who are driving the state’s addiction rates, and Guanajuato authorities have tried shuttering them.

    But they are also the only help available to many Mexicans struggling with serious drug addictions, and some officials hope they could be reformed into vital places for treating the epidemic.

    Alejandro Arias, a state legislator, is pushing for a Guanajuato law that would regulate anexos “to truly rehabilitate those who enter them.” 

    Putting anexos under the supervision of the state’s Secretariat for Health could improve issues ranging from infrastructure deficiencies to inadequate food, shortage of professional staff, overcrowding, mistreatment of those interned, and excessive fees, he says.

    He also hopes that more support could bolster the centers’ ability to fend off the gangs who see the sites as recruiting grounds for new drug users or cartel foot soldiers.

    The goal, he says, would be to “put a stop to organized crime, which has targeted our addicted youth as easy prey, offering them as cannon fodder in their criminal activities.” 

    Murder Capital of Mexico

    Guanajuato has the tragic distinction as the state with the highest number of homicides in Mexico. It was considered one of the most prosperous, peaceful states in the country until 2015, when the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) — one of the most violent criminal organizations in the world — moved in and started vying with local gangs for control of illicit economies.

    The conflict was in part driven by the cartel’s effort to seize lucrative fuel theft networks that siphoned oil from a local refinery’s pipelines and were controlled by the local Santa Rosa de Lima Cartel. Guanajuato’s geographical location, industrial corridors and highway networks also offer an ideal logistical hub for transporting drugs between Mexico and the United States.

    Annual murders grew from 957 in 2015 to 2,539 in 2025. The actual murder rate in Guanajuato is likely even higher; almost 5,700 people are currently reported missing in the state, with around 870 disappearing last year.

    To fund their war, the two cartels flooded Guanajuato’s working-class neighborhoods and factories with methamphetamine.

    “You start to see this reconfiguration in this place, which was previously considered a transit point” for the drug trade, but then emerged as a “strategic territorial hub” for the cartels, says Hugo Córdoba, drug project coordinator at the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    No longer just a passing point for drugs, Guanajuato also became a hot market. 

    “El Bolas,” a man interned at La Sagrada Familia, says he first started using crystal meth during his work in a car factory.  “There’s a lot of crystal meth there because the work is hard, especially at night.”

    He bought the drugs from his co-workers, who were also users, and had started dealing to pay for their own habits.

    “From there it just kept increasing, and I stopped going to work because I was falling asleep from not sleeping well and all that,” he says. “And then I also spent some time using crystal meth while driving. But I was concerned about the risk of having people with me. I had two accidents because of crystal meth.”

    With more drug use, the demand for rehabilitation centers grew. Local anexos, which previously interned 10 or 15 people, filled with up to 100, says David Saucedo, a security analyst based in Mexico. 

    Forced Sobriety and Discipline 

    Those interned at an anexo are often there against their will. After picking up people on the street, Pérez’s team typically calls 911 to report the person’s name and picture and the location, so as “not to commit a crime like kidnapping,” he says. 

    In other cases, desperate families turn to the centers to forcibly take and treat their loved ones. 

    Often, relatives are pushed to the point where the drug use causes behavior in their kin that they cannot cope with: severe paranoia, extreme sleep deprivation, hallucinations, and psychosis.

    Methamphetamine is notoriously one of the hardest drugs to quit, and given the underground and variable nature of the anexo system, there are no statistics on the treatment’s success rate. 

    But Pérez believes centers like his can hold the cure. “We have a lot of faith that, with what we do, we can save a guy, because the miracle worked on me,” says Pérez, who is himself in recovery for an alcohol problem he treated at an anexo.

    This is typical of those staffing the anexo’s day-to-day operations. The five men assisting Pérez in his recent night mission are in recovery too — in fact, they’re interned at La Sagrada Familia. The men they round up tonight will recognize them from multi-day methamphetamine binge parties they once took part in together. 

    The front office of La Sagrada Familia, which is based out of a two-story shop house, is equipped with handcuffs and a first-aid kit with sedatives. Those who are nearing the end of their stay serve as guards, preventing the newcomers from escaping. 

    Pérez once nearly lost an eye, he says, when he was stabbed by a boy being admitted at a family’s request.

    Tonight, things go smoothly. The first man they nabbed prefers to go somewhere else, to a specialized center for the homeless he already knows. The other two men begin their time in La Sagrada Familia without fuss, even when they are forcibly bathed with a hose.

    The plan is for them to stay for at least six months, bunking with nearly 55 others. Those who enter voluntarily or are brought by their families pay between 1,600 and 2,00 pesos per month ($90 – $110) but Pérez says he also accepts those who cannot pay. “Our program is 100% spiritual,” he says.

    The treatment model at La Sagrada Familia is typical of an anexo, forcing sobriety and discipline along with the 12-step Alcoholics Anonymous program. Several times a day, residents meet to recount their experiences, and are applauded or judged by others who know their pain.

    A resident nicknamed “El Trailero” recounts how taking methamphetamine first helped him stay awake on long truck journeys. Quickly, however, insomnia and hallucinations caused him “many setbacks.”

    Some health professionals criticize anexos for entrusting severe addiction recovery to unqualified peers instead of medical professionals. 

    A 2020 report on Mexico’s anexos by the National Human Rights Commission found poor hygiene, a lack of trained staff, as well as allegations of forced internment, physical abuse, threats, and ill-treatment. 

    Abuses of residents resulting in their deaths have also been reported by Centros de Rehabilitación Unidos del Bajío (CRUB), a network of more than 180 anexos in Guanajuato. 

    Pérez serves as president of CRUB, and at La Sagrada Familia there’s no sign of any physical violence. Order is strict, however. At wake-up time, those who slept in the central courtyard store away their mattresses and sweep and mop up.

    Men carry food into the La Sagrada Familia rehabilitation center in Silao, Guanajuato, Mexico, on 16 January 2026. (Credit: Diego Legrand)

    After breakfast, the atmosphere relaxes. A veteran resident gives the newcomers a shave. Others cook for the house, making chicken soup and stews with ingredients bought by those permitted outside, using the money Pérez receives from their relatives, and donations from neighbors.

    Flashpoint of Bloody Cartel War

    The anexos’ vulnerability to cartels was exposed in 2020, when one of the worst massacres recorded in Guanajuato state’s history unfolded at one such rehab center.

    Alejandra — whose last name is withheld for her protection — was interned at Buscando el Camino a mi Recuperación (Seeking the Path to My Recovery) in Irapuato when heavily armed men entered and gathered the male residents on the second floor.

    “I never imagined they were going to kill them. They shot them all in the head,” she says. “When they shot the guy at the door, blood splattered on me and a shell casing fell on my hand.”

    Escaping with a friend, she phoned her mother, who thought she had made up an excuse to run away. Then the story of the mass shooting hit the news. As Alejandra fled, 27 were murdered and several others wounded.

    The scale of the violence brought attention to anexos and some of their questionable practices, Mexico’s failure to provide public addiction treatment, and the fact that Guanajuato was engulfed in cartel violence.

    Nicolás Pérez and a view of the “Buscando el Camino a mi Recuperación” rehabilitation center on 15 January 2026, where a massacre took place in 2020, in Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico. (Credit: Diego Legrand)

    The mass shooting also revealed how CJNG had begun using Guanajuato’s anexos as hideouts, centers for drug distribution, and places to recruit or train young men into service, says security analyst Saucedo, who estimates one third of the centers in Guanajuato could be under CJNG control.

    Both CJNG and local rivals like the Santa Rosa Cartel were already slaughtering anyone they suspected of selling the other’s product. When the local groups then discovered CJNG was taking over anexos, they attacked.

    “The Jalisco Cartel is trying to shield and defend its anexos, and the Santa Rosa Cartel is trying to exterminate them. That is what we currently have: It is the war of the anexos,” Saucedo says.

    Attempting to calm growing public concerns about the anexo system, authorities in Guanajuato reportedly suspended around 49 anexos due to sanitary violations, lack of permits, and other regulatory deficiencies between 2020 and 2025. Yet far from calming the crisis, the move escalated it. 

    Dozens of anexos kept operating in the shadows, and the raids ultimately put desperate drug users out on the streets. Their safety net — however imperfect — had been taken away. 

    The cartels, meanwhile, kept their aggressive battle over the remaining anexos.

    “There was a moment when, unaware this would happen, we carried out operations where we [closed the anexos],” a high-ranking official from Irapuato tells OCCRP on condition of anonymity. “It was said: There cannot be these centers. And then there was a rise in crime incidents.”  

    Now, some local officials are taking a different tack: working to improve the centers instead.

    Anexo Directors Defend Their Work

    The Irapuato official says the rise in crime sparked a more collaborative relationship between anexos and authorities. The municipality is working with them to ensure they comply with local regulations, such as public safety and land use rules.

    Some Guanajuato officials are also seeing progress in the crisis. Mauro González, Guanajuato’s Secretary of Security and Peace, touts the state’s 64% decrease in victims of intentional homicide over the past year.

    Even so, Guanajuato remains the state with the highest number of murders in the country, and anexos are still a target. In January, two died when an anexo named Los Marginados (The Outcasts) was sprayed with bullets.

    At a meeting of dozens of anexo directors in Irapuato attended by OCCRP earlier this year, the main topic of discussion was the threats they are facing from cartels. 

    Not all anexos are attacked for being linked to narcos, the directors say. Some are attacked for refusing to carry out illicit activities for cartels, others are for revenge by former residents who have been mistreated, and others for interning — sometimes unknowingly — a member of a rival cartel. 

    In their meeting, the anexo directors debated whether to report such incidents to the authorities, given the risk the cartels will see them as police collaborators and double down on their attacks.

    Some anexo directors and local officials have also been pushing for the formal legalization of anexos, with the view that government oversight would improve safety and remove them as footholds for the cartels. In March, however, the Guanajuato legislature voted down a proposed law to regulate the state’s anexos.

    “They rejected it with arguments such as, it was invading the federal jurisdiction of the Secretariat of Health or … that the legislation we had presented was over-regulating,” says state legislator Arias.

    Yet there is precedent in other parts of the country, he notes, pointing out that anexos in Mexico City and Chihuahua are registered with their local health ministries and regularly inspected.

    Other states around the country, such as Jalisco, have established  regulatory frameworks for addiction treatment and rehabilitation centers, but enforcement remains uneven and some facilities continue to operate without full registration.

    Arias says he plans to present the law again, “correcting some of the issues they claimed were deficiencies.” But he worries there’s a reluctance to regulate anexos because “from there arises budgetary, medical, and care obligations that maybe the state doesn’t want to fulfill.” 

    At the anexo directors’ meeting in Irapuato, it was clear that many are not merely motivated by business profits, as some critics allege. They see themselves as part of a societal response to an addiction crisis, and will continue undeterred.

    “We are practically abandoned and that is what fills those of us dedicated to this with powerlessness,” said one of the directors, before exclaiming, “If they are going to come and take away what I have built, to hand it over to these jerks, they’d better kill me!”

  • Resident doctors cancel strike after new offer from government

    The walkout had been due to start at 07:00 BST on Monday and last until Friday.
  • Pluralistic: Shareholder supremacy and the precog CEO (13 Jun 2026)

    Today’s links



    A fake cover for CEO magazine. The central figure is a ZOLTAR fortune-telling animatronic, seated before various divination tools. The headline over him is FIDUCIARY DUTY. In the top right corner, there's a slug reading 'UNIVERSAL EXCUSE: A bright line test that's also *totally* unfalsifiable.' To Zoltar's left is another slug reading, 'FRIEDMAN SAID IT: I believe it. That's good enough for me.'

    Shareholder supremacy and the precog CEO (permalink)

    It’s been 55 years since Milton Friedman – cursed be his name – published his NYT editorial, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” in which he invented the idea of shareholder supremacy out of whole cloth and declared it to be a universal, freestanding, inarguable truth:

    https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html

    Friedman’s editorial railed against the idea of “corporate social responsibility,” arguing that corporate managers should confine the exercise of their consciences to projects involving their own money and resources. At work, managers must harden their bleeding hearts and do nothing except increase the returns to their shareholders.

    Friedman wasn’t merely arguing that this would give rise to better companies – the crux of his argument was that by adopting this “fiduciary duty” standard, it would be easy to determine whether a company was being well-managed or run into the ground:

    https://pluralistic.net/2024/09/18/falsifiability/#figleaves-not-rubrics

    Friedman argued that “being a good person” was a squishy, undefinable standard that could never be objectively measured. But “maximizing shareholder value” was a crisp, bright-line test that could be readily evaluated by any reasonable person. “Did this manager make as much money as possible for the company’s owners?” feels like the kind of question we can all agree on, while, “Did this manager behave in an ethical way?” is much harder to answer.

    But even a few moments’ thoughts reveal the flaw in this line of reasoning. We can all agree whether a manager made money for the shareholders – but how can we know whether the manager made as much money as possible?

    Think about how much “corporate social responsibility” cashes out to performative and insincere nonsense and/or cynical marketing. Target didn’t stock Pride merch because they love their LGBTQ friends. They stocked it because they thought they could sell it (same goes for BP marketing its “green” gasoline). Google supports its coders’ environmental/queer/antipoverty efforts because being the “don’t be evil” company lets you hire in-demand workers who might otherwise go to work for Meta, and every engineer a Silicon Valley firm hires adds an average of $1m to the company’s annual bottom line.

    Further: it would be absurd to hold managers to the “make as much money as possible” standard in a competitive market, because in that market, there will always be a company that comes in second. If “as much money as possible” is the standard and you’re Chairman of the Board of the number two company, with $10b in profit, while the number one pulled in $11b, “as much money as possible” demands that you fire the C-suite immediately, since they objectively could have done 10% better.

    So the real standard isn’t “make as much money as possible,” it’s “try to make as much money as possible.” And here again, there’s no objective way to evaluate managerial performance. Target made a lot of money by selling Pride merch…until they didn’t. Do we fire the Target C-suite because they failed to anticipate that 2024 would mark America’s transition into the chuddocene, an era in which selling Pride tchotchkes makes you cucked and soy and, you know, gay?

    Whether it’s “make as much money as possible” or “try to make as much money as possible*,” shareholder supremacy can only be evaluated with the aid of a crystal ball…or a time machine.

    Which raises a question: what made this nonsensical shareholder supremacy standard so damned attractive to corporate leaders?

    Well, what if the ambiguity of shareholder supremacy was a feature and not a bug? What if the function of shareholder supremacy was to absolve the cruelest people for indulging their most sociopathic instincts? What if this “bright line test” was actually a universal excuse, an all-purpose accountability sink that could be used to justify any cruelty or cowardice? “Why didn’t I fire my college buddy when I found out that he was sexually abusing his colleagues? Well, he was the best salesman on the team, and I have an obligation to my shareholders. Sorry, my hands were tied.”

    In other words: Don’t get mad at me.

    Get mad at Milton Friedman.


    Hey look at this (permalink)



    A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

    Object permanence (permalink)

    #20yrsago Microsoft gets Linux geeks evicted from convention center https://web.archive.org/web/20010619154332/http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/06/01/1540231

    #20yrsago Stanford prof sues James Joyce estate for right to study Joyce https://web.archive.org/web/20060615203517/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060613/ap_on_en_ot/james_joyce_lawsuit

    #20yrsago Inside China’s iPod sweat-shops https://web.archive.org/web/20060616173514/http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=14915

    #15yrsago Terry Pratchett initiates assisted suicide process https://web.archive.org/web/20110614215922/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/8571142/Sir-Terry-Pratchett-begins-process-that-could-lead-to-assisted-suicide.html

    #15yrsago Lego-making machine made of Lego https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/forums/topic/56346-review-moulding-machine-4000001-lego-insider-tour-exclusive/

    #10yrsago It’s getting harder and harder to use gag clauses to silence laid off workers in America https://web.archive.org/web/20160611202305/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/us/laid-off-americans-required-to-zip-lips-on-way-out-grow-bolder.html

    #5yrsago The ACCESS Act https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/12/access-act/#interop


    Upcoming appearances (permalink)

    A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



    A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

    Recent appearances (permalink)



    A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

    Latest books (permalink)



    A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

    Upcoming books (permalink)

    • “The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/)
    • “Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It” (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026

    • “The Post-American Internet,” a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

    • “Unauthorized Bread”: a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

    • “The Memex Method,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



    Colophon (permalink)

    Today’s top sources:

    Currently writing: “The Post-American Internet,” a sequel to “Enshittification,” about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Third draft completed. Submitted to editor.

    • “The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE.
    • “The Post-American Internet,” a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING.

    • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


    This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

    Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


    How to get Pluralistic:

    Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    Pluralistic.net

    Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

    Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

    Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

    https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

    Medium (no ads, paywalled):

    https://doctorow.medium.com/

    Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

    https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

    When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla” -Joey “Accordion Guy” DeVilla

    READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (“BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

    ISSN: 3066-764X

  • ‘WhatsApp Gold’ is real scam, but ‘Martinelli’ video allegedly spreading hoax doesn’t exist

    Versions of the “WhatsApp Gold” hoax have been tricking people for nearly a decade.
  • Instability, war and closed borders: How aid workers get emergency food to hungry Afghan children

    The odyssey begins in Indonesia and ends, 15,000 kilometres later, in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. Along the way, critical food aid destined for young Afghan students crosses nine countries, over land and sea, skirting geopolitical unrest and conflict zones.
  • Married Couple Behind ‘Billion-Visit’ Webtoon Piracy Network Caught in Vietnam

    Married Couple Behind ‘Billion-Visit’ Webtoon Piracy Network Caught in Vietnam

    Korea’s Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism rarely names the pirate sites it helps shut down, and its June 12 announcement was no exception.

    It redacted the three high-profile target domains as “Hari***,” “Manhwa***” and “Kun***.”

    These match the names of three well-known manhwa aggregators: Harimanga, Manhwaclan and Kunmanga, all of which started having access problems in late May, right when Vietnamese police seized their servers.

    Initially it wasn’t clear why the sites suddenly went offline, but the authorities confirmed that this was the result of a large enforcement operation that has been in the works for a long time.

    The three sites have reportedly been operated by a Vietnamese couple since January 2023, serving unauthorized English translations of Korean webtoons to readers across Asia, North America and Europe, while paying the bills with banner ads and member donations.

    The sites carried around 14,700 titles, about 70 percent of them Korean, and pulled in more than 1.1 billion visits a year by SimilarWeb’s count. Industry estimates put the damage to Korea’s content business at 207.2 billion won, roughly $136 million.

    One Operation, Three Sites

    Naver Webtoon, which did much of the early legwork, says a single operation ran all three portals, and it had been chasing these exact domains for years. We can independently confirm the latter, as Harimanga, Manhwaclan and Kunmanga all appear by name in a 2023 DMCA subpoena Naver sent to Cloudflare.

    Kunmanga, when it was still online

    kunmanga

    This time, the company mapped the network with open-source intelligence and handed the evidence to Korean officials, who passed it to Vietnamese authorities.

    Vietnamese police questioned the couple on May 19 and seized the servers three days later. Prosecutors plan to charge them locally, with Korea’s copyright agency and Naver helping on the paperwork. Korea has also suggested extraditing the couple for trial and recovering their earnings, though that is a hope more than a plan.

    A Broader Crackdown

    The takedown did not arrive alone. Around the same time, Korea announced the extradition of a 37-year-old man suspected of running Newtoki, which is described as the country’s most notorious manga and webtoon pirate site.

    The man reportedly left Korea in 2017 and took Japanese citizenship in 2022, which normally puts a person out of reach. Officials say it is the first time Japan has handed one of its own nationals to Korea under a treaty the two signed in 2002.

    The Korean piracy crackdown coincides with a new emergency blocking power, which has been live since May 11. This enables the government to order internet providers to block pirate sites without first clearing it with a review committee. The ministry blocked 34 sites on day one.

    Newtoki and its sister sites shut themselves down on April 27, just before the power took effect.

    On Washington’s Watchlist

    There is also a bigger backdrop in Hanoi. In May, the U.S. Trade Representative branded Vietnam a “Priority Foreign Country” over online piracy, its harshest label and the first in thirteen years, then opened a Section 301 investigation that put tariffs on the table.

    Washington’s complaint is that Vietnam rarely makes piracy hurt. Even in its biggest cases, against the operators of Fmovies and BestBuyIPTV, courts handed down suspended sentences and small fines with little deterrent effect.

    This Korea-driven case now tests exactly that. Police seized the servers and pulled the couple in for questioning, firmer than the usual response. Whether that will continue has yet to be seen.

    For now, Harimanga, Manhwaclan and Kunmanga are unlikely to come back in their original form. That said, sites like these have a habit of returning under new names, and at the time of writing, several clones remain online.

    https://claude.ai/chat/818e0d6e-a99a-45ec-8381-0e43d403e857

    https://x.com/kakaoent_pcok/status/2065358465820934643

    https://gemini.google.com/app/db2adf824248b950

    From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

  • Victory! 702 has Expired!

    Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act lets US intelligence agencies collect communications from foreigners abroad without a warrant, and routinely sweeps in Americans’ emails, messages, and calls in the process.

    The authority for this program is set to expire Friday, June 12th, 2026, at midnight. As we wrote earlier this week, Congress has been kicking the ball down the road for months now—temporarily postponing the expiration of the mass surveillance authority Section 702 of FISA in hopes that some consensus on a longer reauthorization could be reached. 

    EFF has said for decades, every time this program is up for renewal: Section 702 should require a warrant before the Federal Bureau of Investigation can look at digital communications collected from Americans. If not, we should let the whole thing expire. And this time, it has, at least for a little while. 

    Ironically, we have Bill Pulte to thank for this (probably temporary) reprieve. Earlier this month, Trump on Tuesday named Pulte – currently director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – to replace current DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who announced her resignation last month. As has been widely reported, Pulte lacks any intelligence, military, or congressional experience. Senate Democrats responded by refusing to move forward with their version of a bill to reauthorize Section 702. Similarly, the House refused to approve even a short-term renewal of the program. 

    However, the potential for abuse of this program is not limited to one individual or one administration. And if Congress is this concerned about one particular individual having access to Americans’ most sensitive information, the responsible thing to do is to put more transparency, accountability, and oversight into the structure of this program. 

    Members on both sides of the aisle understand this. As we have seen several times this year already, the appetite for reform is stronger than ever. We hope to continue to see strong bipartisan opposition in Congress to renewing Section 702 without a warrant requirement for backdoor searches. Until then, the authority for this program should remain expired. 

  • Public urged to access NHS care amid ‘triple whammy’ of doctors’ strike, heatwave and World Cup

    Industrial action by resident doctors will be taking place from 7am on Monday 15 June to 6:59am Friday 19 June 2026. This four-day strike coincides with more expected hot weather and the start of the football World Cup, with millions turning out to watch England’s first match against Croatia on Wednesday. The NHS’s top doctor […]
  • Pluralistic: Google’s new remote attestation scheme is every bit as terrible as its old remote attestation scheme (12 Jun 2026)

    Today’s links



    A pig in a sty. It is wearing badly applied lipstick. From behind one hairy ear pokes the Android droid.

    Google’s new remote attestation scheme is every bit as terrible as its old remote attestation scheme (permalink)

    Long before “agentic AI,” we had the idea that software would act as your agent on the internet. That’s why the old-fashioned technical term for a browser is a “user agent.” Your browser acts on your behalf to retrieve information and then show it to you, in the format you choose. It’s your agent:

    https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/07/treacherous-computing/#rewilding-the-internet

    This is a powerful and profound idea. It is because browsers are our “agents” that we expect them to accept our directives, say, by blocking pop-ups, or by turning off autoplay sound, or by blocking commercial surveillance trackers:

    https://privacybadger.org/

    Your browser does all that because your browser works for you. The reason your browser can work for you is that the web is an open, standardized technology. In theory, anyone who follows the standards published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) can make a browser, and that web browser can connect to any web server. Browsers and servers are interoperable. It’s the same force that means you can put anyone’s gas in your gas-tank, or anyone’s shoelaces in your shoes, or anyone’s milk on your cereal.

    But what if manufacturers could dictate those choices to you? What if your light socket refused to use a lightbulb unless it was officially blessed by the socket’s manufacturer? What if your dishwasher refused to wash your dishes unless you bought them from one of the manufacturer’s “dish partners”? What if your toaster refused to toast “unauthorized bread”?

    https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/

    It’s hard to see how a company could win its market with this strategy. After all, if the dishes are really better than the competition’s, you’d buy them voluntarily, without any need for law or technology to force the matter. The only reason to make a dishwasher that refuses a rival’s dishes is if the manufacturer’s own dishes are ugly, expensive, and/or badly made.

    But once a company owns the market – once they’ve achieved dominance by buying out their rivals; by bribing potential competitors to stay out of their lane; and by engaging in deceptive conduct to trap key suppliers and customers – they could cement their dominance by blocking interoperability, keeping out rival dishes, milk, gas, lightbulbs, shoelaces and bread, capturing their whole market and squeezing it.

    That’s what Google has done, and that’s what Google wants to do more of. Google’s commercial behavior has been so unethical, deceptive and abusive that the company just lost three federal antitrust cases:

    https://www.bigtechontrial.com/p/google-loses-the-adtech-monopolization

    This thrice-convicted monopolist bribed Apple – more than $20b/year – to stay out of the search market:

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/how-do-you-solve-problem-google-search-courts-must-enable-competition-while

    They cheated app vendors, ripping them off with sky-high junk fees and onerous conditions that raised prices while lowering the share of your spending that went to the companies whose products you were paying for:

    https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/boom-google-loses-antitrust-case

    They cheated advertisers, rigging the ad market to gouge businesses on ad prices and underinvesting to fight rampant ad-fraud, sucking hundreds of billions out of the productive economy for overpriced ads that no one saw:

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-prevails-landmark-antitrust-case-against-google

    Google wasn’t always this way. The “don’t be evil” company owes its very existence to the open web ecosystem. When the company started to index the web in 1998, it was playing on an open field, where any web server could talk to any “user agent,” even one whose user was a startup like Google, that was making a copy of every page on the server.

    For years, Google thrived on the open web, and built open technologies. Android – the mobile operating system that Google bought in 2005 – was presented as an “open” alternative to existing mobile offerings, and as the mobile market collapsed into two companies – Google and Apple – Google always presented Android as the open alternative to Apple’s “walled garden.”

    There were always ways in which Google’s “open” Android wasn’t exactly open. The company engaged in illegal “tying” arrangements that forced hardware vendors and carriers to lock out versions of Android that were created by Google’s competitors:

    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_4581

    In other words, even though Google offered a mobile platform that was (mostly) technically open, they used commercial and legal strategies to choke off the market oxygen for alternative Android versions that tried to capitalize on that technical openness.

    But life finds a way. The existence of an open, modifiable, tinkerer-friendly mobile operating system meant Android hackers could create alternatives to Google’s (de facto) walled garden, which thrived in the cracks in that garden wall. Operating systems like CalyxOS, PureOS and Graphene offered a more private, more secure Android experience, one that was largely “de-Googled,” blocking Google’s relentless acquisition of your private data:

    https://grapheneos.org/

    And Google’s data-hunger is relentless. Android exfiltrates a chunk of your personal and behavioral data every five minutes. The “resting heartbeat” of Android surveillance pulses and pulses, irrespective of whether you’re using your device, and the instant you unlock your screen, that heartbeat quickens, sending even more data to the company:

    https://digitalcontentnext.org/blog/2018/08/21/google-data-collection-research/

    All that data has proved irresistible to authoritarian governments. Donald Trump’s enforcers have seized on Google data as a vital source of information about the identity of protesters and the location of migrants hunted by ICE:

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promise-me-now-ice-has-my-data

    So there are plenty of reasons why users would seek out these de-Googled alternatives to Android, finding them in spite of Google’s illegal commercial tactics to block access to competing technologies. The worse it got, the better those alternatives looked.

    Perhaps this explains Google’s years-long effort to increase the technical barriers to using modified versions of Android, beefing these up to match the commercial restrictions that stand in the way of a de-Googled existence.

    Back in 2023, Google floated the idea of “Web Environment Integrity” (WEI), a set of modifications to web standards that would force your computer to disclose its operating environment to the web servers it connected to, even if you objected to this disclosure:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/02/self-incrimination/#wei-bai-bai

    WEI was a form of “remote attestation.” That’s when your device uses a sub-processor (sometimes called a “Technical Protection Module” or “TPM”) or a walled off part of its main processor (sometimes called a “secure enclave”) to produce a cryptographically signed description of your device and its configuration: which hardware, software, plug-ins and settings you’re running.

    When you connect to a server, it demands that your device send this “attestation” before it handles your request. If your device won’t provide this data, or if the server doesn’t like (or recognize) your device and its details, it can refuse to deal with you. And because the attestation is prepared by a TPM or a secure enclave that you can’t modify or override, you don’t get to decide which facts about your device it’s allowed to see.

    Practically speaking, this means that remote attestation lets a server refuse to deal with you until you turn off your ad-blocker and your tracker-blocker. It means that the server can discriminate against users who block auto-play sound and video, who block pop-ups, who put the tab in the background when it’s playing a mandatory pre-roll ad.

    WEI was especially disturbing in light of Google’s efforts to kill ad-blockers and privacy blockers through updates to Chrome, an effort that continues to this day:

    https://protonprivacy.substack.com/p/google-is-finally-killing-ublock

    These blockers are an important part of the dynamic between web publishers and their users. In the real world, when you get an offer, you can make a counter-offer. That’s all an ad-blocker is: a way for users to respond to a server whose opening bid is, “How about you give me all your data and let me take over your computer in exchange for showing you this page?” with “How about ‘Nah?’”

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/adblocking-how-about-nah

    We didn’t get rid of pop-up ads by making them illegal, or by boycotting advertisers who used them. We got rid of pop-up ads when web users installed pop-up blockers, which made pop-up ads pointless. Take away our ability to block obnoxious digital content and you guarantee that we will be flooded with it.

    These kinds of modifications aren’t just used to block ads – they’re also key to accessibility. People who have photosensitive epilepsy or who (like me) suffer from low-contrast vision problems use add-ons to reformat pages so that we can safely and legibly access them.

    WEI’s creators said they were only trying to put the web on a level playing field with apps, which routinely rat you out to the companies you connect to. Apps are a source of bottomless enshittification, not least because (unlike the web), they enjoy special, dangerous legal protections that make it very legally risky to modify them:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/31/unsatisfying-answers/#systemic-problems

    WEI wasn’t an effort to level the playing field between apps and the web – it was a race to the bottom, an attempt to make the web as enshittogenic as the app hellscape.

    Public outrage to WEI killed the project, but Google’s commitment to augmenting its illegal commercial lockdown efforts with technical lockdowns never ended. Now, Google has rolled out an experimental “reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification” that uses an app, your camera, and your device’s TPM or secure enclave to produce an attestation about your Android device:

    https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652

    This will make it much easier for the apps and other services you interact with to block your device if you run an Android alternative, or if you install a mod that overrides the actions of Google’s stock Android:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/PrivacySecurityOSINT/comments/1tbdjbj/privacy_concerns_around_googles_recaptcha_mobile/

    This is a terrible idea – it’s every bit as bad as WEI was. In an age in which Big Tech is ever-more tied to authoritarian governments, redesigning our devices to tell strangers things we don’t want them to know isn’t just shortsighted, it’s inexcusable.


    Hey look at this (permalink)



    A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

    Object permanence (permalink)

    #20yrsago Images from anti-DRM protest at the San Fran Apple Store https://www.flickr.com/photos/quinn/tags/drmprotest/

    #15yrsago Reasons people were arrested at the Toronto G20 https://memex.craphound.com/2011/06/11/reasons-people-were-arrested-at-the-toronto-g20/

    #15yrsago Paul Krugman: Rule by rentiers favors billionaires, Chinese bond-holders over jobs and homeowners https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1

    #15yrsago Ontario publicly funded Catholic school bans rainbows, appropriates student donations for LGBT cause and gives them to Catholic charity https://web.archive.org/web/20110610125236/https://www.xtra.ca/public/Toronto/Rainbows_banned_at_Mississauga_Catholic_school-10262.aspx

    #10yrsago How to be less wrong about the First Amendment https://web.archive.org/web/20160611221927/https://popehat.com/2016/06/11/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-the-first-amendment/

    #10yrsago Mounties used Stingrays to secretly surveil millions of Canadians for years https://web.archive.org/web/20160610182607/https://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-rcmp-surveilled-thousands-of-innocent-canadians-for-a-decade

    #5yrsago Privacy Without Monopoly, EU edition https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/11/technological-self-determination/#dma


    Upcoming appearances (permalink)

    A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



    A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

    Recent appearances (permalink)



    A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

    Latest books (permalink)



    A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

    Upcoming books (permalink)

    • “The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/)
    • “Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It” (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026

    • “The Post-American Internet,” a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

    • “Unauthorized Bread”: a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

    • “The Memex Method,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



    Colophon (permalink)

    Today’s top sources:

    Currently writing: “The Post-American Internet,” a sequel to “Enshittification,” about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Third draft completed. Submitted to editor.

    • “The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE.
    • “The Post-American Internet,” a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING.

    • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


    This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

    Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


    How to get Pluralistic:

    Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    Pluralistic.net

    Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

    Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

    Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

    https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

    Medium (no ads, paywalled):

    https://doctorow.medium.com/

    Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

    https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

    When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla” -Joey “Accordion Guy” DeVilla

    READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (“BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

    ISSN: 3066-764X