Author: tio

  • Legal Plunder: An Interview with Joe Soss and Joshua Page

    While the story of mass incarceration will be familiar to blog readers, a concurrent trend in American criminal justice has received far less attention: the rise of criminal-legal predation. Since the 1980s, a complex public-private infrastructure has developed around extracting revenue from criminalized people, their loved ones, and their communities. In their new book, Legal Plunder: The…

    Source

  • Posh sandwich has more salt than nearly five cheeseburgers

    Action on Salt & Sugar said people should not be exposed to a “hidden health risk every time they buy lunch”.
  • MPs call for sunbed advertising ban to help prevent skin cancer

    A report by a cross-party group of MPs has found the majority of skin cancer cases are preventable.
  • ‘It’s Just Business’: Texts Reveal the Daily Work — and Drama — of an International Cocaine Syndicate

    ‘It’s Just Business’: Texts Reveal the Daily Work — and Drama — of an International Cocaine Syndicate

    A week has passed and Dritan Gjika, an alleged cocaine kingpin known as “Tony,” is still waiting to be paid. 

    “Look sir, your partner told me that he would send the money yesterday, then later he told me today,” Gjika tells a business partner. They are discussing the sale of “material” shipped via container from Ecuador to Spain.

    When the man tells him to “calm down” and not be so “distrustful,” Gjika’s exasperation bursts through. 

    “Sir it’s not distrust it’s respect! … Everything arrived well, a price was agreed on together that you liked. I don’t need to wait until he sells it slowly over there in order to be paid!”

    Later, he clarifies: “It’s just business and we need speed.” 

    This tense exchange did not take place in the Italian restaurant or shiny office building in Ecuador’s bustling port city of Guayaquil where Gjika and his associates were known to meet. Instead, it was carried out in the way that most people communicate today: over text. The only difference is that these men were writing to each other through the encrypted messaging platform SkyECC, a favorite tool of criminals and other underworld figures until it was broken open by European police in 2021. 

    After the platform’s decryption, Sky chats were shared with authorities worldwide, including in Ecuador, where the Albanian-born Gjika is wanted on charges of organized crime and money laundering.

    OCCRP has obtained hundreds of pages of Gjika’s Sky chat logs, which were filed by Ecuadorian prosecutors as evidence in the criminal case against him and members of his alleged network. 

    The text messages, which run from May 2020 to March 2021, provide an unprecedented glimpse inside the day-to-day operations of a powerful drug-smuggling organization whose corporate-like structure stretched across borders in a relentless pursuit of profits. 

    The messages also reveal the depth of the group’s infiltration of police and ports in Ecuador, a once placid country that has in recent years been transformed into a superhighway for cocaine.

    At least 17 people charged with belonging to or aiding the criminal organization have been convicted in Ecuador, 15 of whom are awaiting appeal. Four others were convicted of laundering the proceeds from this illicit trade, making transfers of more than $43 million between 2015 and 2023. 

    Yet Gjika, the man prosecutors allege is the leader of this network — and who is now one of Ecuador’s most wanted men — managed to slip out of the country undetected. He was later arrested in Abu Dhabi in May 2025, and is now awaiting extradition to Ecuador, where he is under a judge’s orders to face the court upon his return. (His lawyers did not respond to requests to comment, but in a pre-trial hearing in Ecuador they argued there was insufficient evidence to prove their client had committed a crime, and questioned the legality of how the Sky messages were originally obtained). 

    According to intercepted chats, Gjika  maintained direct involvement in nearly every arm of his alleged operation, from the hiring of drivers to the management of shipping schedules and the exact calculation of outstanding debts. He valued reliability and diplomacy, and appears to have commanded fierce loyalty from his colleagues. 

    “I’ll go with you wherever you tell me brother… and with my eyes closed,” one of his frequent interlocutors, who the chats suggest managed connections with Colombian suppliers, wrote after Gjika said he had “a lot of work” to offer him in December 2020.

    Despite hailing from a country thousands of miles away, Gjika appears to have achieved a striking mastery of slang-heavy Spanish, peppering his texts with colloquial greetings and turns of phrase — as well as cryptic language when it came to discussing the details of his work. 

    To help decode these conversations, reporters cross-checked the content of the chats against thousands of pages of court records containing police reports and testimonies, plus other files from the prosecutors’ investigation. Reporters also consulted experts, including to verify the meaning of the group’s coded lingo.

    In their world, it emerged, a “box” may signify a shipping container that can be “impregnated” with “things” — i.e. filled with packages of cocaine. “The uglies,” meanwhile, refer to police.

    In one unusually candid conversation, however, Gjika’s apparent business partner reflects on their line of work, and openly describes it as “traqueteando,” a common slang term in Latin America for drug trafficking:  

     

    Now 49, the Albanian first landed in Ecuador in 2009 under a temporary visitor visa, joining a wave of Balkan nationals who have moved closer to the source of the cocaine supply chain in recent decades. 

    While Ecuador is not itself a producer of the narcotic, it has emerged as Latin America’s primary export hub, with Albanian, Mexican, and Colombian crime groups muscling in to take advantage of its booming maritime trade in goods like bananas — a favorite target of smugglers because of the fruit’s need to move through ports quickly.

    According to Renato Rivera, a researcher at the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), Albanian traffickers brought a distinctive corporate culture to Ecuador’s cocaine business that focused more squarely on money-making than on engaging in turf wars to gain territorial control. 

    To this end, the network allegedly run by Gjika was fluid and did not appear to maintain a fixed alliance with either of Ecuador’s top criminal gangs, he said.  

    “These types of people don’t ‘marry,’ so to speak. They don’t form strategic alliances with any of the criminal groups,” said Rivera. “Rather, it’s a business model based on market opportunities.”

    According to Ecuadorian authorities, the criminal organization allegedly led by Gjika had a pyramidal corporate structure with the Albanian at the top, followed by a “management level” of senior directors that included his alleged lieutenant, the Argentine-Italian national Mario Sánchez Rinaldi. 

    In February 2024 Sánchez Rinaldi was arrested in Spain, where some 70 people and legal entities allegedly connected to the trafficking network are still under investigation. (An Ecuadorian lawyer for Sánchez Rinaldi, who remains in detention in Spain, told OCCRP he was not authorized to comment on the case. ) 

    To facilitate their transatlantic shipments, the group allegedly used legitimate export companies in Ecuador as a cover for their drug smuggling. The profits were then laundered through these legal businesses as well as real estate purchases.  

    The Sky chats reveal the granular details of how this cocaine ‘multinational’ operated, from the monthly supplier contracts to the specific cash points used to collect their profits. The conversations provide a window into how the group navigated logistical hiccups and innovated in response to interventions by law enforcement. And, crucially, they reveal what made the work of this operation possible: a remarkable level of access to Ecuador’s maritime ports and the huge volume of shipping containers dispatched around the world daily. 

    Ecuador’s police, customs, and port authority did not respond to requests to comment.

    ‘Two tonnes a month — minimum’

    According to prosecutors, the smuggling network chiefly sourced its cocaine from laboratories in neighboring Colombia, the world’s top grower of the coca plant, whose leaves are crushed up and purified through various chemical processes in order to extract the powdery drug. 

    The Sky chats show Gjika took the lead in negotiating deals to ensure a steady stream of the narcotic, brokering contracts for multiple tonnes to be delivered on a monthly basis — a notable amount given that, at the time, cocaine seizures in Ecuador rarely topped one tonne. 

    “Friend my cousin told me you have good things,” he wrote to an apparent supplier in January 2021.

    “I’m interested but what makes me a little scared is that I don’t know the people, I know you and you seem to be very serious and a kid who has his feet on the ground,” he added. 

    The supplier told Gjika he was managing two “kitchens” — a slang term for the labs where cocaine is extracted from coca leaves — and asked for the Albanian’s trust to accept his business.

     

    In another conversation, Gjika described a contract for a “minimum” of “6 T” with another apparent supplier in Colombia who said he had five so-called kitchens at his disposal. 

     

    Yet, sometimes, the plan goes awry. 

    The following day, on February 1, 2021, five men were arrested in the Ecuadorian province of Los Ríos with half a tonne of cocaine found inside of their cargo truck, cut into 1-kilo packages branded with the logo UNICO. 

     

    After hearing the news, Gjika wrote to the man who had offered to supply “6 t” to inform him of the incident. 

     

    Gjika starts to express suspicions about how this operational failure could have occurred, noting that the drivers of the shipment hadn’t been following his schedule. 

     

    Later, the pair confirm the worst: The “merchandise” was seized too. 

     

    The discussion that follows shows Gjika trying to parse what went wrong, and what the consequences should be. He wants to know what happened to an individual they refer to as “the taxi driver,” who was not arrested. While it is never clearly stated, the chats suggest this could describe one of the “patrollers” the men discuss dispatching to accompany the shipments in a separate car. 

     

    What happens next is not known, as the chat log ends with Gjika’s interlocutor asking for his BC1 — a reference to a rival form of encrypted device operated by the company Number 1BC, which has drawn customers looking for alternatives after news spread that Sky and other similar firms had been compromised.

      

    Rotterdam to Russia

    In order to transport this steady supply of cocaine abroad, chiefly to Europe, the network allegedly led by Gjika amassed control over a “large part of the foreign trade logistics chain,” according to Ecuadorian prosecutors. For the trial, investigators collected proof of the group’s involvement in at least 11 drug shipments from the port of Guayaquil to European terminals in 2020 and 2021. 

    When reached for comment, authorities in the ports of Antwerp, Algeciras, and Hamburg told reporters to contact police or customs for further details on efforts to combat drug trafficking, while the operators of ports in Mundra, Gioia Tauro, Tanger Med, and Rotterdam did not respond.  

    To pull off their transatlantic feats, the network cultivated informants inside Ecuador’s ports, according to prosecutors, who cite the chats as evidence of the traffickers’ access to “privileged information” from the computer systems of terminals in Guayaquil. 

    The casual nature of the Sky conversations reflects their apparently seamless infiltration of these facilities, with the men discussing their work at the ports in a routine and ordinary manner.  

    “No problem whatever port it is we’ll get it out don’t worry,” Gjika wrote in reference to four of Guayaquil’s port terminals in a conversation about which shipping route an importer planned to use.   

    “Sir, I take full responsibility [for what happens] in the port !!” he  later added, though cautioned that he could “not guarantee” anything if there was an “information leak,” or if the “cops come down on me” on the day of the job. 

    When reached for comment, Contecon, one of the three port terminals in and around Guayaquil mentioned in the chats, said the port “collaborates closely with [the] Ecuadorian State to ensure a safe and secure trade through our facility.” The other two ports did not respond to requests to comment.

    The group’s ability to contaminate containers appears to have relied on “friends” who had direct access to the ports.

    “The friends inside are about to give me the box to work on in one hour maximum,” reads a message Gjika received in August 2020.

    Among those convicted in Ecuador was a police officer who was in charge of examining containers at a port. Another officer with the same role was declared a fugitive in 2024, while a third was found to be innocent.

    But the group’s links to Ecuador’s police force went even deeper. A retired police officer named Héctor Pesántez, who prosecutors said went by the alias “Glock,” was convicted of serving as one of the group’s senior figures. In the chat logs, he can be seen feeding Gjika inside information from Ecuador’s anti-narcotics police.

    According to his indictment, Pesántez was responsible for recruiting others in supervisory roles in order to facilitate trafficking through the ports. (He did not respond to OCCRP’s requests to comment, but in court he pleaded not guilty and is awaiting an appeal). 

    “I contacted the friends,” the retired officer wrote Gjika in July 2020. “They tell me there have already been some staff changes, even the anti-narcotics national director is new. They have changed the schedule for days off.”

    He then advises Gjika to adjust his agenda to align with when their “friends” will be on duty:

     

    According to Daniel Pontón, a Dean of Security Studies at Ecuador’s state university, the government has struggled to properly secure its ports, which are mainly operated  by private companies granted concessions by the state. 

    “The problem is that Ecuador does not have adequate control of the ports. Neither a unified, nor coherent, nor intelligent strategy. It is a gaping hole; it is like having a person bleeding out, and if you don’t put on a tourniquet, they are going to die,” he said.

    Company to Company

    The Sky conversations touch on various methods the group used to sneak their contraband inside shipping containers. One of those, which law enforcement describes as the “blind hook method,” sees smugglers simply place the drugs next to legitimate cargo, as opposed to mixing it in with the legal goods or hiding it in a more elaborate fashion. 

     

    There are also clues that the group employed more sophisticated methods. In another exchange, Gjika and an interlocutor discuss efforts to prepare a container with a welder and some paint. The result, Gjika says, is that “the scanner doesn’t catch it, absolutely confirmed.”

    From the back-and-forth, it seems possible the pair are discussing storing cocaine in the structure of the container itself — an approach that Spain’s Interior Ministry said the group started using to conceal smaller batches of the drug after a 1.1 metric tonne shipment was intercepted by Dutch authorities in 2020.

     

    Some chats also directly reference the group’s use of what they, and Ecuadorian police, refer to as the “company to company” method. This is when traffickers minimize their risks by directly controlling the export companies that carry the cocaine, and by partnering with importers run by their collaborators. 

     

    According to court records and Ecuador’s business registry, Gjika, those convicted or accused of participating in the trafficking network, or their close relatives owned or managed more than 30 firms in the country. 

    Among these, three companies either owned or administered by Gjika and his alleged right-hand man Sánchez Rinaldi were alleged by prosecutors to have facilitated drug trafficking. Two worked mainly as banana exporters.

    Spain was also a logistical node for the group’s cocaine shipments. In a letter seeking assistance from Ecuadorian authorities, Spain’s national court alleged that Sánchez Rinaldi, described as an “important businessman” based in the Costa del Sol, managed a “powerful” group of food import and export businesses that allowed him to “facilitate the logistics” of cocaine trafficking for third parties. 

    The businessman was allegedly responsible for securing the drug’s entry into Spain’s port of Algeciras, and for “facilitating importing companies in Europe,” Spain’s national court said in another letter sent to French authorities.

    Cashing in

    When the product does successfully arrive on European shores, the chats appear to show Gjika negotiating its sale to distributors. He frequently takes part in conversations — some of them tense — over prices, quality tests on the product, and distribution plans. 

    “Do you have merchandise up there ???” a Sky user, who Ecuadorian authorities described as a possible coordinator of the group’s cocaine shipments into Spain, asked him in July 2020. “I need in Spain there is nothing.” 

    “If you have in Holland I can look for a truck to bring it down to Spain,” the Sky user offered. “You tell me the price there and I’ll bring it down.”

    A few months later, Gjika checked-in with an Ecuadorian collaborator who was convicted of participating in the criminal organization and who, according to prosecutors, at one point relocated to Spain. “Sir, how is the price there?” Gjika asked him, before plotting his next move.

    Once prices are sorted, often after significant haggling, the chats include conversations about how to collect earnings via an underground cash delivery network that appeared to be operating out of cities worldwide, from Cali to Madrid, Brussels, and Birmingham. 

    The quantity of cash passing hands is often staggering. In Barcelona, Spanish authorities said their agents detected multiple cash deliveries linked to the group, including one that led to the seizure of one million euros hidden inside a vehicle.

    Separately, in a December 2020 conversation over Sky, Gjika discusses a series of transfers of Colombian pesos worth the equivalent of $2.3 million to be collected in Cali.

     

    References to such “tokens” are frequent, as they refer to a string of numbers — usually the serial number of a dollar or euro bill — that are used as a type of password shared with the cashier to ensure the money is released into the right hands. 

    While this type of underground transfer system allows its users to circumvent the strictures of banks, it carries its own risks. In an August 2020 conversation, Gjika and a man known as the “Engineer” appear to discuss the details of a cash collection operation in Quito  that did not go according to plan. 

    Citing the Sky chats, police linked this cash operation to a Chinese national who was ultimately convicted of collaborating in the group’s drug trafficking and laundering their money. (He pleaded not guilty, and has appealed the ruling. His lawyers did not respond to requests to comment). 

     

    Just over an hour later, the “Engineer” — who would later be convicted of collaborating with the trafficking organization — reports back that “The Chinese” was short on cash, and that the full amount could not be collected. 

     

    The “Engineer” then asks if he can take some of the money to pay members of his team, and Gjika apparently agrees he can keep “100,” which a police report suggests is shorthand for $100,000. They seem to agree to meet the following day for a business chat so that Gjika can show him “where and how [the money] is invested.”

    But when Gjika’s part of the cash arrives the following day, it’s “10” less than he expected.

      

    When pressed, Gjika’s collaborator says the missing $10,000 must have gotten lost when another associate “got scared” on the busy commercial street where the exchange took place near a “chifa” — a reference to a restaurant serving a  fusion of Chinese and Ecuadorian cuisine.

     

    After sending some audio messages, whose contents are not detailed in the chat logs, the two men appear to have resolved the issue.

     

    When reached for comment, a lawyer for the man known as the “Engineer,” Julio César Lalangui Medina, noted that his client’s appeal is still pending, with a hearing scheduled for June 25, 2026 and that there is a “broad and deep legal debate internationally regarding the validity, authenticity, integrity, traceability, and legality” of using Sky messages as evidence.

    ‘We’re changing everything’ 

    As early as September 2020, Gjika had apparently caught wind that the Sky devices they were using were no longer safe. 

    “We’re changing everything, because many people say that Sky is no longer reliable,” he texted a colleague, encouraging him to buy one of the BC1 phones.  

    But the men would keep using Sky for nearly six months more, with the last message in prosecutors’ files dated March 2021.

    Their use of Sky would eventually spell the unravelling of the Ecuadorian network, yet whether the man prosecutors characterize as its leader will face justice remains uncertain. Despite having been arrested nearly a year ago, the United Arab Emirates has yet to extradite him. (The country’s Foreign Affairs and Justice ministries did not respond to requests to comment.) 

    In the meantime, cocaine — and the bloodshed that follows in its wake — continues to surge through Ecuador at record levels.

    Rivera, the security expert, noted that as international traffickers boost the country’s cocaine trade, local gangs keep jostling for a slice of the pie.

     “The financing they provided and the interest in moving more cocaine through Ecuador generates conflict among local groups, and those conflicts generally manifest as fights for territorial control,” he said.

    “Therefore, it isn’t their presence itself, but rather the funding they’ve brought for the movement of cocaine that indirectly generates greater violence.”

  • Patients of retired dentist warned of bloodborne viruses, including HIV

    Authorities urged patients to get tested due to “poor infection control practices” at the Australian clinic.
  • Daily pill to help keep weight off after stopping obesity jabs

    The tablet – orforglipron – is available in the US and could soon launch in the UK.
  • Broken Promises: RIP Instagram’s End-to-End Encrypted DMs

    Last week, Instagram ended its opt-in, and therefore rarely used, end-to-end encryption feature. Years after publicly promising to provide the privacy protections of end-to-end encryption across its platforms by default, it instead gave up on that technical challenge. Now, we’ve all lost an option for safer conversations on one of the biggest social media platforms in the world.

    In an announcement in 2023, Meta bragged about how it had successfully encrypted Messenger, and teased that Instagram was in progress. Even before then, they’d talked about how important encryption was in Messenger and Instagram in a white paper published in 2022, stating: 

    We want people to have a trusted private space that’s safe and secure, which is why we’re taking our time to thoughtfully build and implement e2ee by default across Messenger and Instagram DMs.

    So where did the reversal come from? In a statement, Meta claimed that, “Very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs.” This isn’t all that surprising, as turning it on was an optional four-step process that few people knew about. Defaults matter, and Meta’s choice to blame people for failing to opt into this feature is proof of how much. In that same statement, the company pointed people to WhatsApp for access to encrypted messaging. Yet if Meta truly wanted people to have a trusted private space to communicate, it would meet them everywhere they are: on WhatsApp, on Messenger, and on Instagram.

    But at least Meta was straightforward about the fact that it will not continue to support or work on this feature. That’s rare. Most tech company promises aren’t broken explicitly, they just remain undelivered long enough to be forgotten. 

    This is particularly disappointing as other companies take even bigger swings, like Google and Apple working together to implement end-to-end encryption over Rich Communication Services (RCS), and Signal’s continued work to make its app simpler and easier to use for everyone.

    Meta abandoning this principle is disheartening, especially as we are still waiting for other promised features from the company, like end-to-end encryption in Facebook Messenger group messages. Instead of blaming users for not using these sorts of features and then abandoning the promise of delivery, Meta—and other tech companies—should start by enabling strong privacy protective features by default.

  • Hampshire College Rejected the Market Model of Education

    Hampshire College Rejected the Market Model of Education

    On Tuesday, April 14, it was announced that Hampshire College, my alma mater, a pathbreaking experiment in radical pedagogy, would be permanently closing in the fall of this year. With its first class of 250 students in 1970, Hampshire’s founders took the bold approach of believing that young people could design their own educations. The college never had tests or grades, and students created their own majors. This self-directed curriculum has been imitated elsewhere but retained its purest form at Hampshire. So long as you could find a mentor, you could cobble together a concentration in almost anything: game design, ancient Irish, cheesemaking—the world was your oyster. That was the idea, anyway. As you can imagine, at an underfunded school full of overworked faculty and weird teenagers, things often went pear-shaped. But failure and the self-discovery that went with it were all supposed to be part of the Hampshire experience.

  • Patch Tuesday, May 2026 Edition

    Artificial intelligence platforms may be just as susceptible to social engineering as human beings, but they are proving remarkably good at finding security vulnerabilities in human-made computer code. That reality is on full display this month with some of the more widely-used software makers — including Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla and Oracle — fixing near record volumes of security bugs, and/or quickening the tempo of their patch releases.

    As it does on the second Tuesday of every month, Microsoft today released software updates to address at least 118 security vulnerabilities in its various Windows operating systems and other products. Remarkably, this is the first Patch Tuesday in nearly two years that Microsoft is not shipping any fixes to deal with emergency zero-day flaws that are already being exploited. Nor have any of the flaws fixed today been previously disclosed (potentially giving attackers a heads up in how to exploit the weakness).

    Sixteen of the vulnerabilities earned Microsoft’s most-dire “critical” label, meaning malware or miscreants could abuse these bugs to seize remote control over a vulnerable Windows device with little or no help from the user. Rapid7 has done much of the heavy lifting in identifying some of the more concerning critical weaknesses this month, including:

    • CVE-2026-41089: A critical stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Netlogon that offers an attacker SYSTEM privileges on the domain controller. No privileges or user interaction are required, and attack complexity is low. Patches are available for all versions of Windows Server from 2012 onwards.
    • CVE-2026-41096: A critical RCE in the Windows DNS client implementation worthy of attention despite Microsoft assessing exploitation as less likely.
    • CVE-2026-41103: A critical elevation of privilege vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to impersonate an existing user by presenting forged credentials, thus bypassing Entra ID. Microsoft expects that exploitation is more likely.

    May’s Patch Tuesday is a welcome respite from April, which saw Microsoft fix a near-record 167 security flaws. Microsoft was among a few dozen tech giants given access to a “Project Glasswing,” a much-hyped AI capability developed by Anthropic that appears quite effective at unearthing security vulnerabilities in code.

    Apple, another early participant in Project Glasswing, typically fixes an average of 20 vulnerabilities each time it ships a security update for iOS devices, said Chris Goettl, vice president of product management at Ivanti. On May 11, Apple shipped iOS 15, which addressed at least 52 vulnerabilities and backported the changes all the way to iPhone 6s and iOS 15.

    Last month, Mozilla released Firefox 150, which resolved a whopping 271 vulnerabilities that were reportedly discovered during the Glasswing evaluation.

    “Since Firefox 150.0.0 released, they have been on a more aggressive weekly cadence for security updates including the release of Firefox 150.0.3 on May Patch Tuesday resolving between three to five CVEs in each release,” Goettl said.

    The software giant Oracle likewise recently increased its patch pace in response to their work with Glasswing. In its most recent quarterly patch update, Oracle addressed at least 450 flaws, including more than 300 fixes for remotely exploitable, unauthenticated flaws. But at the end of April, Oracle announced it was switching to a monthly update cycle for critical security issues.

    On May 8, Google started rolling out updates to its Chrome browser that fixed an astonishing 127 security flaws (up from just 30 the previous month). Chrome automagically downloads available security updates, but installing them requires fully restarting the browser.

    If you encounter any weirdness applying the updates from Microsoft or any other vendor mentioned here, feel free to sound off in the comments below. Meantime, if you haven’t backed up your data and/or drive lately, doing that before updating is generally sound advice. For a more granular look at the Microsoft updates released today, checkout this inventory by the SANS Internet Storm Center.

  • Libyan Coast Guard Fired on Migrant Rescue Ship, Charity Says

    The German humanitarian organization Sea-Watch said that an armed vessel affiliated with the Libyan Coast Guard opened fire on one of its rescue ships shortly after the crew pulled 90 people from an overcrowded wooden boat in the Mediterranean.

    In a statement on Tuesday, the group said the Libyan patrol boat fired on the civilian ship, the Sea-Watch 5, in international waters about 55 nautical miles north of Tripoli, the Libyan capital.

    “The attack began at around 11 a.m. on Monday morning,” Sea-Watch said. “First, a single shot was fired, followed by a burst of approximately ten to fifteen further shots — without any warning.”

    Militia members aboard the Libyan vessel then used radio communications to order the Sea-Watch 5 to sail to Libya, the group added, threatening to board the ship when the rescue crew refused.

    “Since 2016, we have documented more than 75 cases of extreme violence committed by Libyan militias in the Mediterranean,” said Giulia Messmer, a spokesperson for Sea-Watch. “Protection from Italy? None. Consequences for this escalation of violence? None either.”

    Sea-Watch noted that its crews had previously come under fire from Libyan units in September 2025, prompting the organization to file criminal complaints in Rome and Hamburg, Germany, last month. Other aid groups have reported similar hostility; in August 2025, SOS Méditerranée said the Libyan Coast Guard fired on its vessel, the Ocean Viking, in international waters as it carried 87 migrants.

    Human rights organizations have long criticized the European Union for funding and equipping the Libyan Coast Guard to intercept migrants in order to curb irregular migration to Europe. The financial and logistical backing continues despite widespread allegations that Libyan forces subject returned migrants to forced labor, torture, and unlawful detention.

    “The European Union has helped create a violent monster in the form of the so-called Libyan coastguard that it is now either unwilling or unable to control,” Messmer said.

    In a related development, the International Criminal Court (ICC) is set to begin hearings into crimes committed against migrants and refugees in Libya. Scheduled for May 19–21, 2026, the proceedings will determine whether to confirm charges against Khaled Mohamed al-Hishri, a senior figure in the militia formerly known as the Special Deterrence Forces (RADA). The militia is aligned with the Tripoli-based Libyan Presidential Council, which assumed power in 2021 through a UN-backed process. 

    Al-Hishri is accused of committing, ordering, and overseeing crimes against humanity and war crimes against both Libyan nationals and migrants detained at Tripoli’s Mitiga Prison between May 2014 and June 2020.

    The hearings represent the first case in the ICC’s 15-year investigation into Libya to reach this stage, according to the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), which described the move as a “long-awaited step toward justice, truth, reparation, and deterrence.”

    Libya, a major transit point for migrants attempting to reach Europe, has become an increasingly hostile environment as people making the trek face widespread abuses and inhumane conditions at the hands of security forces and militias.

    While the country remains a primary transit hub, migrants face a wide array of perils ranging from systemic exploitation and physical violence to death. Security forces and militias have been widely accused of perpetrating abuses in migrant detention facilities across the country. A February 2025 report detailed the horrific experiences within these detention centers, where human trafficking victims recounted being captured in Tunisia and sold to Libyan armed groups. Many were held in these camps until their families could pay ransoms, which in some cases exceeded $700.

    Through mid-2025, a series of mass graves containing hundreds of migrant bodies were discovered at various locations across the country. One site where authorities discovered 10 charred bodies was the former headquarters for the Stability Support Apparatus (SSA), a security force that operated under the Presidential Council until May 2025. An additional 67 bodies were found in hospital refrigerators, while another burial site was uncovered at the Tripoli Zoo, an area previously under SSA control.

    According to an International Organization for Migration (IOM) report published last month, nearly 8,000 people lost their lives or disappeared on migration routes in 2025. The Central Mediterranean route from Libya and Tunisia to southern Europe remains “the deadliest migration route to Europe based on existing evidence, with casualties reported even before migrants reach embarkation points,” the organization said.