Author: tio

  • Right-Wing Lawyer Claims Victory in Tightly Disputed Colombian Election

    A right-wing populist who refers to himself as “The Tiger” for his promised crackdown on crime and illegal armed groups in Colombia has declared victory in Sunday’s presidential election, ordering the leftist incumbent to step aside. The current administration refuses to concede the razor-thin election and wants to wait until the results are officially confirmed.

    “Accept the result, pack your bags and prepare to act as the opposition,” Abelardo de la Espriella told his rivals Sunday night, demanding that left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda and outgoing President Gustavo Petro immediately accept defeat.

    Warning against any post-election unrest, he declared that “there will be no third round of voting on the streets here.” However, he reassured the nation that he accepts the presidency as a “sacred duty.”  

    “I shall be the president of all Colombians,” he promised. “There will be no winners or losers, no reprisals or persecution, because in a democracy there are no irreconcilable enemies – there are fellow citizens who think differently but who have the same rights as us.”

    Tapping into deep national anxieties over public security, de la Espriella promised a sweeping, militarized crackdown on armed groups and corruption. “To the criminals, the kidnappers and the corrupt who steal the people’s resources, I hereby notify you that Colombia once again has a Government and a State,” he declared. “All will be pursued relentlessly.”

    His campaign, heavily built on these hardline messages of militarized security and economic growth, earned him an endorsement from U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Yet some believe that his iron-fist rhetoric stands in stark contrast to his own controversial history. Throughout the campaign, critics frequently highlighted his past as a defense lawyer for notorious figures tied to organized crime, violent paramilitaries, and massive money-laundering networks—including Alex Saab, a businessman accused of coordinating a sprawling laundering scheme for the Venezuelan regime.

    Despite de la Espriella’s demands for a concession, the current administration is refusing to hand over the presidential palace just yet.

    President Petro urged the nation not to be “overcome by hatred” and called for a national dialogue, pushing back against the premature victory lap.

    “No one can be declared president,” Petro warned. “It is the vote count that determines who the president is. I will abide by the judges’ decision.”

    His political ally, Cepeda, thanked his supporters for backing “profound, democratic social change,” and stated that his campaign currently recognises the preliminary count but announced his legal team is already in the process of challenging the results at 33,000 polling stations across the country. He stressed he will only accept the outcome once the final, official verifications are completed.

    The standoff is rooted in Colombia’s electoral law and Sunday’s close preliminary tally.

    According to the National Civil Registry’s rapid overnight count, de la Espriella secured 49.66 percent of the vote, edging out Cepeda’s 48.70 percent. Out of more than 26 million ballots cast, the margin of victory stands at a razor-thin 250,830 votes.

    The close finish reflects a tightening of the race since the first round of voting on May 31, where de la Espriella led with 43.7 percent (10.3 million votes) over Cepeda’s 40.9 percent (9.7 million votes).

    While the preliminary numbers give de la Espriella the edge, they hold zero legal weight. The official winner will only be determined after the formal vote count—the escrutinio—a rigorous, legally binding review conducted by judges and notaries that could take several days to complete.

  • Japan Arrests Alleged Associate of Cambodia’s Sanctioned Prince Group

    Japanese police arrested an alleged associate of Cambodia-based Prince Group which is  accused of being one of Asia’s biggest crime organizations that engaged in scamming, extortion, and forced labor. Hu Xiaowei has been arrested in Osaka, Japan, according to a police interview given to Kyodo, Japan’s leading news agency, and shared with OCCRP on Monday.

    The U.S., the U.K. and South Korea have sanctioned the Prince Group at the end of last year, while several jurisdictions have frozen assets linked to the group. 

    The conglomerate is allegedly part of a booming criminal industry in Southeast Asia, which uses “sophisticated schemes, including scams in which people are lured into fake romantic relationships, to defraud victims on an industrial scale,” the U.K. foreign office then said.

    The Prince Group has rejected such allegations.

    A senior official at Tokyo’s Metropolitan Police Department confirmed reports published by Asahi Shimbun, another leading Japanese news organisation, of Hu Xiaowei’s recent arrest at a luxury hotel in Japan’s second largest city, under his Cypriot identity, “Hu Shi”.

    The latest developments have also been privately confirmed to OCCRP by regional Japanese police and western government sources. 

    OCCRP has reported extensively on Hu Xiaowei, including unmasking his multiple identities and his extensive portfolio of global assets as well as his recent trips to Japan on a private jet, and the extensive network of real estate assets and companies owned by other Prince Group executives in Japan.

    In the interview with Kyodo, the police official — who was authorised to speak to media only if his name was withheld — said Hu had been residing in Japan on a “high skilled professional” visa and was attempting to acquire permanent residency. 

    Tokyo police suspect Hu of filing a fraudulent change-of-address notification after moving to Japan, and arrested him on the basis of violating laws against using false electronic official records.

    Hu was also the owner of a Tokyo-based company called Tokuten Shoji Ltd, according to company documents seen by Kyodo and OCCRP, although authorities could not determine the extent of its actual business scope.

    Authorities would continue to investigate any possible violations of Japanese law. 

    Hu Xiaowei did not immediately respond to requests for comment sent to his personal assistant, whom OCCRP had previously corresponded with. 

    Prince Group also did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In a previous recent statement, a Prince Group spokesperson dismissed allegations against the conglomerate and its chairman Chen Zhi, who has been sanctioned and indicted in the U.S.

    “Mr. Chen and his companies were not a criminal syndicate but a collection of legitimate businesses serving millions of people and employing tens of thousands of people across the globe,” the spokesperson said by email.

    “Chen Zhi and the Prince Group of companies are innocent of the wild and unfounded accusations made by the U.S government, parroted in jurisdictions around the world,” the spokesperson added.

  • Government Information Belongs to Everyone: Democracy’s Library in 2026

    Government Information Belongs to Everyone: Democracy’s Library in 2026

    Governments produce an abundance of information and put that information in the public domain, but often the public can’t easily find or access it. The Internet Archive’s Democracy’s Library project is helping by preserving critical information and publications produced by governments: federal, state, provincial, and municipal– and making them available to anyone wanting to build new services on them.  

    Since the program’s launch in 2022, the Internet Archive has built on this already strong foundation by becoming a designated Federal Depository Library—joining 1,100+ peer libraries—and by utilizing Democracy’s Library as a means to connect to libraries, archives, and patrons with purpose.

    What’s in Democracy’s Library? 

    Examples of what is in our growing collection of over 11 million items include recent additions like the the Supreme Court Records & Briefs, which joins established varied and important collections such as those from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, government documents from the nation of Aruba, NASA Technical Reports, the End of Term Crawls, the IGS/UC Berkeley California local government documents project, records from the US Census, the Canadian Government Publications Portal, and more.

    Although it would be convenient to tie the practice of preserving government information to the messy birth of the United States, grounded as it was in principles around liberty and democratic process, we lack pithy quotes from the founders on this exact topic. What we do see is recognition in the very first Congress that citizens needed access to documentation of the business of their government. 

    In 1789, the House of Representatives provided for the printing and distribution of the laws and proceedings of the new Congress. From this modest beginning, the US Government rapidly rose to become the largest publisher in the world. Over the following century, a series of legislative milestones followed: the establishment of the Government Printing Office in 1860, and the Government Printing Act of 1895, which centralized GPO’s authority as the primary channel for distributing the federal record. 

    Taken together, these efforts reflect a consistent, if imperfectly realized, principle: that government information belongs to the people and that information should be freely distributed to its citizens for their own use. It is important to note that libraries were identified as the natural and primary means of getting that information into the hands of citizens.

    Who are the audiences for government information? 

    First and foremost, government itself; it is essential that law and policy makers understand prior law and policy. With an abundance of outputs, governments are not always the best record keepers and frequently turn to libraries to find appropriate documentation. 

    Second, we see serious researchers (including journalists) as those that rely on access to government information. These users seek authoritative sources and want assurances around provenance and reliable sources; libraries provide that authority. 

    Third, we see curious and motivated citizens. Users in this category include genealogists but can also include people like property owners seeking to understand current or prior ordinances in their jurisdiction, or people seeking to understand the history of their house or neighborhood. 

    Finally, an emerging category of user is machines; research methods mediated and assisted by computers have been on the rise for some time, but with the advent of LLMs and generative AI tools, a human assisted by a machine is emerging as a distinctive category of user. Looking across these categories, we can assert that government information not only belongs to everyone, but it is for everyone. 

    Why is Democracy’s Library important today?

    Democracy’s Library is more than just collections – it is also a movement to bring people together in common cause, to take action, and to build momentum around increasing access. The Information Stewardship Forum, hosted by the Internet Archive in March, was one such gathering and we look forward to more in the future. 

    One of the themes that emerged from the Information Stewardship Forum is that, especially in an increasingly complex and dynamic environment, public access to government information cannot be left to chance. As the United States marks 250 years, Democracy’s Library exists to make sure it isn’t. Please join us. 

    Let us know how we can help you by collaborating to digitize and preserve collections, to build services on existing collections, and to support each other in areas of mutual interest. I welcome your emails at any time. I will be attending GODORT meetings at the June 2026 American Library Association meeting in Chicago, and you can find me there, as well as at the CNI meeting in December in Washington DC, or at our headquarters in San Francisco anytime you are in town. 

  • Afghanistan in crisis: Drought, malnutrition and a worsening humanitarian situation

    Imagine being one of a family of nine and sitting down to a meal of potato peelings and other scraps, boiled up into a soup. This is the harsh reality for many of Afghanistan’s most vulnerable families, forced on them by climate change and drought, widespread malnutrition and increasing restrictions on women, since the Taliban overran Kabul in 2021.
  • World at ‘perilous moment’ as leaders warn HIV gains are at risk

    Four decades after AIDS first emerged as a global crisis, world leaders, advocates and community representatives gathered at UN Headquarters on Monday issued a stark warning: progress against HIV is slowing just as financial pressures and shrinking support threaten to reverse decades of gains.
  • World News in Brief: Pope Leo urges action on hunger, humanitarian strain deepens in Gaza, families return to Lebanon

    Pope Leo called on the international community to renew its commitment to tackling hunger and malnutrition, describing access to adequate food as a “fundamental human right” during a visit to the World Food Programme (WFP) headquarters in Rome on Monday.
  • Sudan: Drone attacks endanger civilians and shut down critical services in El Obeid

    Escalating violence in and around the Sudanese city of El Obeid is putting civilians at increased risk and disrupting essential services, the UN aid coordination office OCHA said on Monday. 
  • Global Ebola cases top 1,000 as UN races to reach DR Congo’s most vulnerable

    As global confirmed Ebola cases reach 1,000, nearly three million children and adolescents are at risk in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), while efforts increase to treat prisoners near the epicentre of the current outbreak, UN agencies warned on Monday.
  • Myanmar: Aid decline compounds suffering amid ongoing military attacks

    A decline in humanitarian assistance is worsening the suffering of millions of people in Myanmar after five years of conflict-related violence, the UN human rights office, OHCHR, said in a report published on Monday.
  • Security Council LIVE: Warnings of ‘dangerous cycle of escalation’ in Ukraine

    Deadly drone and missile attacks in Ukraine over the weekend represented a “dangerous cycle of escalation” in Russia’s full-scale four-year-old war, the Security Council heard on Monday from Mohamed Khaled Khiari, Assistant Secretary-General in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, while Edem Wosornu, crisis response director at the UN relief office, OCHA, warned that “the choices made here can mean the difference between lives saved or lives lost.”