Blog

  • The clock is ticking for my five-year-old son with dementia

    Tammy McDaid describes how she had a panic attack after waking up on Tate’s birthday.
  • Apple Workers Are Livid That Tim Cook Saw “Melania” Movie Hours After CBP Killed Pretti

    Just hours after a U.S. Border Patrol officer gunned down Minneapolis resident Alex Pretti, Apple CEO Tim Cook, donned his tuxedo to attend an exclusive screening of a new documentary about First Lady Melania Trump. A growing number of Apple workers are now internally criticizing Cook and the company’s silence in the face of an ongoing campaign of federal brutality.

    The response within Apple to Cook’s attendance of the “Melania” screening has been starkly negative, according to internal Slack logs reviewed by The Intercept. A link to an article from The Verge headlined “Here’s Tim Cook hanging out with accused rapist Brett Ratner at the Melania screening” drew a chorus of reactions, including dozens of vomiting emojis. The article prompted waves of dissent about both Cook and the company’s apparent unwillingness to condemn immigration-related violence across the United States. This level of internal anger is unusual at Apple, which has avoided the kind of political rancor that has swept rivals like Google and Microsoft.

    “This isn’t leadership. This is an absence of leadership.”

    Cook has openly embraced Trump, particularly in his second term, attending the president’s inauguration, presenting him with an engraved golden trophy, and giving money to the White House to help construct the president’s $300 million pet project ballroom.

    The relative workplace calm may be over. “I hope we never find out, but I seriously started wondering what our leadership would do if an Apple employee was summarily executed by our government,” wondered one employee.

    Many workers claimed hypocrisy between Apple’s longtime professed commitment to progressive values and causes and the extent to which its CEO has cozied up to the Trump administration. “But but but…. we changed the Apple website to MLK last Monday, so that cancels out.” Another pointed sarcastically to the company’s recent announcement of Black History Month Apple Watch bands. “Went to hang out with the guy who didn’t even acknowledge MLK Day and took away park access on the day,” commented one worker. “Sounds like an interesting documentary. Hopefully we’ll hear more about it through a push notification in Apple Wallet,” said another employee.

    “Three retail locations in the Twin Cities and not a peep.”

    Many others expressed dismay at the fact that Apple has yet to issue any statement about violence perpetrated by Customs and Border Protection agents, as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, as it has in the past following similar national traumas. In 2020, following the police murder of George Floyd, Cook wrote an open letter condemning his killing: “We can have no society worth celebrating unless we can guarantee freedom from fear for every person who gives this country their love, labor, and life.”

    For some, the affront was personal. “As a lifelong Minnesotan and an Apple badged employee for over half my life I feel pretty abandoned by the company that has told me it stands for humanity more times than I can count,” wrote another worker. “Silence on ICE violence speaks volumes.” Another pointed out the “Three retail locations in the Twin Cities and not a peep” from Cook. “This isn’t leadership. This is an absence of leadership.” To which a colleague quickly countered: “I disagree, this IS leadership. This is intentional, nobody travels to the white house by mistake.”


    Related

    Read the Report on Alex Pretti’s Killing — and the Bizarre Q&A CBP Gave Congress First


    An Apple employee who has spent decades at the company said they had noticed a marked cultural and political shift within Apple under Cook’s tenure. “A lot of people are talking about how Steve Jobs would have never given a gold bar to a politician,” referring to the 24-karat gold trophy Cook presented Trump at the White House in August.

    “Typically, before the genocide in Gaza started, Tim would write an email about every major horrible event that would happen in support of workers at the company who might be related to those events,” said the employee, who spoke to The Intercept on the condition of anonymity. This worker said that Apple employs a large number of immigrants, making violence at the hands of ICE and CBP as personal as anything the company has ever expressed sympathy over. “There has been a dramatic shift in the way Apple operates worldwide. Before they would focus on quality and design and doing the right thing, and now they’re just getting things out quickly and pandering to fascists.”

    Apple could not be immediately reached for comment.

    Internal debate has differed on whether Cook should issue a statement internally, publicly, or both. “We aren’t asking for Tim to make a private statement to employees,” argued one worker. “We’re asking him to take a stand for basic human rights and morals. Or at the very least to not be seen smiling and hobnobbing with the people treading on these values on a constant basis. Oh and not openly bribing them with tacky gold bars that very very clearly violate the Business Conduct Training that we are all required to repeat on an annual basis.”

    Some workers have argued that, while unpalatable, Cook’s friendly relationship with the White House and silence on ICE or CBP is simply the job of the chief executive. The unpleasant reality of his fiduciary duty “means he needs to pander to criminals who want to destroy our democracy in order to ward off tariffs that would tank iPhone sales,” suggested one employee. “From my perspective, he’s choosing to take the hit to his reputation for the benefit of his employees, and for the customers that depend on our products and services,” argued another Slack commenter. “He’s truly in a tough position. An easy way out would have been to retire, but Tim doesn’t strike me as someone that would take the easy way out. He’s likely weighing the costs of every significant action.”

    Some pointed out that, from a purely self-interested public relations standpoint, the corporate silence was counterproductive. “Just imagine for a second if Apple was the first big tech company to actually stand up for people’s rights against the admin,” wrote one. “Can’t think of a better PR move at this moment.”

    A second Apple employee, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity, told The Intercept that the current dismay is without precedent. “I don’t think I’ve ever seen our internal Slack so busy with so many worried discussions going on at the same time on similar topics,” they said. “Apple leadership used to be an inspiration for many of us due to the importance given to ethical products, but these days it feels more and more that the folks that are supposed to represent Apple’s values wouldn’t even pass the internal business conduct training that most employees have to attend.”

    The post Apple Workers Are Livid That Tim Cook Saw “Melania” Movie Hours After CBP Killed Pretti appeared first on The Intercept.

  • ‘I was diagnosed with OCD at 10’. Here’s how to spot the signs

    Most of us will have intrusive thoughts at some point. Dr Nina Higson-Sweeney explains when you should seek help.
  • Beware: Government Using Image Manipulation for Propaganda

    U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem last week posted a photo of the arrest of Nekima Levy Armstrong, one of three activists who had entered a St. Paul, Minn. church to confront a pastor who also serves as acting field director of the St Paul Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office. 

    A short while later, the White House posted the same photo – except that version had been digitally altered to darken Armstrong’s skin and rearrange her facial features to make it appear she was sobbing or distraught. The Guardian one of many media outlets to report on this image manipulation, created a handy slider graphic to help viewers see clearly how the photo had been changed.  

    This isn’t about “owning the libs” — this is the highest office in the nation using technology to lie to the entire world. 

    The New York Times reported it had run the two images through Resemble.AI, an A.I. detection system, which concluded Noem’s image was real but the White House’s version showed signs of manipulation. “The Times was able to create images nearly identical to the White House’s version by asking Gemini and Grok — generative A.I. tools from Google and Elon Musk’s xAI start-up — to alter Ms. Noem’s original image.” 

    Most of us can agree that the government shouldn’t lie to its constituents. We can also agree that good government does not involve emphasizing cruelty or furthering racial biases. But this abuse of technology violates both those norms. 

    “Accuracy and truthfulness are core to the credibility of visual reporting,” the National Press Photographers Association said in a statement issued about this incident. “The integrity of photographic images is essential to public trust and to the historical record. Altering editorial content for any purpose that misrepresents subjects or events undermines that trust and is incompatible with professional practice.” 

    This isn’t about “owning the libs” — this is the highest office in the nation using technology to lie to the entire world.

    Reworking an arrest photo to make the arrestee look more distraught not only is a lie, but it’s also a doubling-down on a “the cruelty is the point” manifesto. Using a manipulated image further humiliates the individual and perpetuate harmful biases, and the only reason to darken an arrestee’s skin would be to reinforce colorist stereotypes and stoke the flames of racial prejudice, particularly against dark-skinned people.  

    History is replete with cruel and racist images as propaganda: Think of Nazi Germany’s cartoons depicting Jewish people, or contemporaneously, U.S. cartoons depicting Japanese people as we placed Japanese-Americans in internment camps. Time magazine caught hell in 1994 for using an artificially darkened photo of O.J. Simpson on its cover, and several Republican politcal campaigns in recent years have been called out for similar manipulation in recent years. 

    But in an age when we can create or alter a photo with a few keyboard strokes, when we can alter what viewers think is reality so easily and convincingly, the danger of abuse by government is greater.   

    Had the Trump administration not ham-handedly released the retouched perp-walk photo after Noem had released the original, we might not have known the reality of that arrest at all. This dishonesty is all the more reason why Americans’ right to record law enforcement activities must be protected. Without independent records and documentation of what’s happening, there’s no way to contradict the government’s lies. 

    This incident raises the question of whether the Trump Administration feels emboldened to manipulate other photos for other propaganda purposes. Does it rework photos of the President to make him appear healthier, or more awake? Does it rework military or intelligence images to create pretexts for war? Does it rework photos of American citizens protesting or safeguarding their neighbors to justify a military deployment? 

    In this instance, like so much of today’s political trolling, there’s a good chance it’ll be counterproductive for the trolls: The New York Times correctly noted that the doctored photograph could hinder the Armstrong’s right to a fair trial. “As the case proceeds, her lawyers could use it to accuse the Trump administration of making what are known as improper extrajudicial statements. Most federal courts bar prosecutors from making any remarks about court filings or a legal proceeding outside of court in a way that could prejudice the pool of jurors who might ultimately hear the case.” They also could claim the doctored photo proves the Justice Department bore some sort of animus against Armstrong and charged her vindictively. 

    In the past, we’ve urged caution when analyzing proposals to regulate technologies that could be used to create false images. In those cases, we argued that any new regulation should rely on the established framework for addressing harms caused by other forms of harmful false information. But in this situation, it is the government itself that is misusing technology and propagating harmful falsehoods. This doesn’t require new laws; the government can and should put an end to this practice on its own. 

    Any reputable journalism organization would fire an employee for manipulating a photo this way; many have done exactly that. It’s a shame our government can’t adhere to such a basic ethical and moral code too. 

  • Europe’s Top Rights Court: Azerbaijan Prosecuted Journalist to Silence Her

    Europe’s top human rights court ruled on Tuesday that Azerbaijan’s prosecution of Khadija Ismayilova, one of the country’s best-known investigative journalists, was intended “to silence and punish her for her journalistic activities.”

    Ismayilova has spent years exposing high-level corruption in Azerbaijan, including business dealings involving the family and close associates of President Ilham Aliyev. She has worked with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

    Ismayilova was convicted of tax evasion and “illegal entrepreneurship” for carrying out her journalism activities without media accreditation. She was arrested in December 2014 and released in May 2016.

    In its judgment, the European Court of Human Rights said Azerbaijani authorities were “driven by improper reasons” when they launched a series of criminal proceedings against the veteran reporter between 2014 and 2015.

    The Strasbourg court found the judicial decisions against her were “flawed with arbitrariness” and deprived Ismayilova of a fair trial. Judges noted that at least one charge—related to her lack of accreditation—was “directly connected to her practice of journalism,” and concluded that Baku had failed to show the prosecution was unrelated to her status as a reporter.

    Under the ruling, Azerbaijan must pay Ismayilova 12,000 euro (over $14,000) in moral damages and an additional 4,000 euro (over $4,700) in legal costs.

    The European Court of Human Rights has previously ruled in Ismayilova’s favor against Baku in other cases, including judgments on her initial arrest, pre-trial detention, and an “unjustified and flagrant invasion of her private life” during a public smear campaign.

    Ismayilova has again faced restrictions, including a travel ban in 2024, as part of an ongoing crackdown on independent media. Since November 2023, Azerbaijani authorities have arrested at least 28 journalists, including her colleagues at Toplum TV.

  • How British Hunger Strikers Scored a Victory for Palestine

    How British Hunger Strikers Scored a Victory for Palestine

    Wednesday, January 7 marked a grim milestone for the Prisoners for Palestine campaign. To demand that the United Kingdom stop arming Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the group has been coordinating the largest collective hunger strike in British prisons since the 1980s, when Margaret Thatcher’s government allowed ten Irish Republicans to die rather than grant them status as political prisoners. For protester Heba Muraisi, January 7 was her 66th day on strike, the same day on which Bobby Sands, the most famous of those Irish martyrs, had died. Though Heba was losing her ability to speak, she was determined to continue even in the face of death, saying, “I’m choosing to continue this because for the first time in 15 months, I’m finally being heard.”

  • Feb 26th: AD4E Ask Anders!

    Feb 26th: AD4E Ask Anders!

    Online event

    Overview

    If psychiatric drugs are affecting your life, your work, someone you care about -this space, this opportunity, is for you.

    Psychiatric drugs are prescribed to millions, often with little discussion of what they actually do, how long they should be taken, or how difficult withdrawal can be.

    Dr Anders Sørensen – clinical psychologist, researcher, and author of “Crossing Zero: The Art and Science of Coming Off – and Staying Off – Psychiatric Drugs” – offers a space in this AD4E zoom room where he answers your questions based on what science really tells us about psychiatric medication and withdrawal.

    This space is for anyone navigating withdrawal, considering coming off psychiatric drugs, supporting someone who is, or working therapeutically with people who take them.

    Bio

    Anders Sørenson is a Danish clinical psychologist and emerging voice in the field of psychiatric drug withdrawal. For more than a decade, he has supported individuals in safely coming off psychotropic medications, combining clinical insight with rigorous academic research. He holds a PhD in psychiatric drug withdrawal from the University of Copenhagen.

    Through his private practice, Anders bridges research and practice – guiding people through the slow, often challenging process of tapering, and supporting them to stay well.

    His groundbreaking book Crossing Zero: The Art and Science of Coming Off – and Staying Off – Psychiatric Drugs, has recently been released in English.

    It is the first comprehensive “how-to” guide dedicated to psychiatric drug withdrawal and tapering. Anders says:

    “This book is a practical, evidence-based guide for those navigating psychiatric drug withdrawal – and for the clinicians and loved ones supporting them. Too many people go through this process alone, misinformed, or unsupported.

    I wrote this book to change that.”

    Crossing Zero doesn’t stop at the tapering process. It also answers the essential question – if not medication, then what? Three full chapters explore what comes after tapering stops … offering practical psychological tools and exercises for working with difficult emotions, trauma reactions, anxiety, rumination, and self-criticism.

    In addition to his expertise in withdrawal, Anders helps people do the deeper psychological work of healing – using trauma-informed, psychotherapeutic approaches that support self-compassion and a return to wholeness.

    “Most countries still lack formal guidelines for safe psychiatric drugs tapering, leaving many people to figure it out on their own – or come off way too fast for their bodies to keep up. And when people then deteriorate after stopping their medication, they’re often told “the illness is returning.” But what if it’s withdrawal we’re seeing, not the original problem resurfacing? What if it’s simply the drug leaving the system too fast for the body to and brain to adapt?

    Understanding that difference is critical. And helping people navigate the process – while also navigating the psychological journey beyond medication – is the core of my work.

    Get tickets here

    The post Feb 26th: AD4E Ask Anders! appeared first on Mad in the UK.

  • Newborn baby dies after mum not woken for heart rate check

    Sonny Taylor was “left distressed for a significant amount of time” before his birth, a report says.
  • Pluralistic: Carney isn’t a hero (and that’s OK) (27 Jan 2026)

    Today’s links



    A triple-masted schooner on a rough sea racing ahead of the wind. Drowning in its wake is a beleaguered caricature of Uncle Sam.

    Carney isn’t a hero (and that’s OK) (permalink)

    I blame novelists: it’s only in prose that we get the illusion of telepathy, of being inside the mind of another. No wonder novelistic tales of political transformation focus on the moral fortitude of individual leaders.

    The problem is, it’s a destructive lie.

    Sure, leaders sometimes exhibit moral fortitude and courage. But we can’t rely on our leaders to be perfect – or even pretty good. The only reliable way to get the leadership we deserve is to force our leaders to follow us, by organizing in political blocs that mete out severe punishments when they betray us.

    Say what you will about the Tea Party, but boy, did they understand this. During the Obama years, any Republican that wavered from the party line was mercilessly tormented by Tea Party activists, who flooded their offices with calls and emails, showed up at their town halls, and at restaurants when they were trying to have dinner, and then they backed their primary opponents. The Tea Party years were a winnowing function for the GOP, and the only Republican politicians who survived were the ones who refused to compromise. This worked for them in world-historic ways. It was thanks to the Tea Party that the GOP was able to steal two Supreme Court seats, for example.

    Corporate Democrats use the Tea Party as an example of why we can’t let the public into progressive politics. After all, corporate Dems already have control over Democratic politicians, and so any organized rank-and-file bloc threatens their ability to push elected politicians to pursue grotesque policies like supporting genocide in Gaza or showering billions on ICE:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/seven-democrats-just-voted-to-approve-ice-funding-full-list/ar-AA1ULAn7

    The seven Dems who voted to fund ICE knew that they were doing something that would be wildly unpopular with the voters who sent them to DC, but they did it anyway, because they aren’t afraid of those voters. They treat their voters as ambulatory wallets to be terrorized into donating small sums via relentless text messages about the impending end of democracy in America, even as they vote for the impending end of democracy in America.

    These seven lawmakers don’t just need to be primaried: they need to be made an example of. Their names must be a curse. They must be confronted in public – long after they are out of office – by voters brandishing pictures of the people ICE murdered after receiving the funds they voted for. They must be haunted for this decision for the rest of their days. As Voltaire said, “Sometimes you must execute an admiral to encourage the others.”

    Here are their names:

    • Tom Suozzi (New York)
    • Henry Cuellar (Texas)
    • Don Davis (North Carolina)
    • Laura Gillen (New York)
    • Jared Golden (Maine)
    • Vicente Gonzalez (Texas)
    • Marie Glusenkamp Perez (Washington)

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/seven-democrats-just-voted-to-approve-ice-funding-full-list/ar-AA1ULAn7

    Politicians – even the most unhinged and narcissistic ones – go through life attuned to public rage. Even Trump. Why else would Trump have ordered ICE Obergruppenführer Gregory Bovino “home with his tail between his legs”?

    https://prospect.org/2026/01/27/ice-greg-bovino-minneapolis-one-battle-after-another-sean-penn/

    Counting on politicians to do the right thing out of principle is a loser’s bet. Far more reliable is to bet on them doing the right thing because they’re afraid of being cursed and humiliated and haunted by their betrayal to the end of their days.

    Don’t be fooled by politicians and pearl-clutchers insisting that the norms fairy and “comity” are the only way to get things done. We are not in an era of reaching across the aisle in a spirit of public service. We are in the era of fascist goons murdering our neighbors in the street and then dancing a celebratory jig. We arrived at this juncture in large part because we accepted glaring bullshit about “comity”:

    https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/30/meme-stocks/#comity

    This isn’t merely frustrated militancy on my part. I’m hoping that you will join me in this understanding of politics: that good leadership is downstream of politicians being terrified of betraying their duty to the public, and we need not rely on moral perfection to make progress.

    Take the EU’s energy transition. For decades, the EU’s leaders – like leaders everywhere – were in thrall to the fossil fuel industry. They were fully paid-up members of the most extreme wing of the capitalist death cult, determined to render the only planet in the known universe capable of sustaining human life uninhabitable in order to enrich a tiny coterie of already ultrawealthy climate criminals.

    Then came the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and with it, a continent shivering in the dark, bereft of Russian gas and oil. Suddenly, the most powerful lobbyists in the history of civilization – fossil fuel pushers – lost their grip on Europe’s leaders. In a few short years, Europe went from a decade behind its energy transition to a decade ahead:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/23/our-friend-the-electron/#to-every-man-his-castle

    European politicians didn’t just trip and find their spines. A continent full of frozen, furious people made yielding to the fossil fuel lobby unthinkable. Once the penalties for betraying the public inarguably exceeded any conceivable benefits from selling out to Big Oil, Big Oil ate shit.

    Which brings me to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, a man who didn’t so much win office as fail to lose it, after his Conservative opponent Pierre Poilievre saw a 50-point collapse in his poll numbers the instant Donald Trump (whom Poilievre had repeatedly associated himself with during the campaign) promised to turn Canada into “the 51st state.”

    Carney is hardly an avatar of progressive politics. As Governor of the Bank of England, he oversaw a program of crushing austerity after the crash of 2008. As Canadian PM, he has fired tens of thousands of civil servants while promising billions to build out national AI so that our government can be handed over to hallucinating chatbots running on processors and software that we can only buy from companies that will do Trump’s bidding. Having won office with an “elbows up” mandate to resist Trump, Carney proceeded to cave to Trump’s demands on even modest measures, such as a plan to end rampant tax cheating by the US tech giants.

    And yet, earlier this month, Carney travelled to the World Economic Forum in Davos to deliver an extraordinary speech that declared a “rupture” in the “international rules-based order,” an order that he simultaneously declared to have been a sham all along:

    https://www.programmablemutter.com/p/davos-is-a-rational-ritual

    This is an incredibly weird (but good!) speech for Carney to have made. Carney is the epitome of “Davos Man,” a technocrat with a long history of using his office and power to inflict real suffering on working people in the name of abstract economic stability. This contradiction has been the source of much opnionating about whether a) Carney is sincere about this, and b) Carney can be trusted to follow through on it.

    The answers to this are obvious (to me, at least): a) Who cares if he’s sincere, because b) He’s shown that if he’s frightened enough of the public’s fury at his capitulation, he will locate his spine. Which means that the future of Carney’s ambitious program of “rupture” and bold effort to isolate Trump and the USA will depend on our ability to force him to make good on his promises.

    That means that we have to “stand on guard” – to give no ground to Canadian “moderates” who counsel against bold action to defend the country from Trump, lest this make Trump mad. The idea that we can strike a bargain with Trump is indisputably, profoundly stupid. Yet for the past year a sizable fraction of Canada’s great and good have been able to insist, in public, that Trump will bargain with us in good faith.

    Trump undeniably, provably treats any concession as weakness. He will break his word in a heartbeat. The more we appease him, the more he will demand of us. Any Canadian politician or opinion-former who even hints that we can “make a deal” with Trump should be treated as a dangerous lunatic to be isolated and shunned (the only exception being that any time they show their faces in public, they should be relentlessly bollocked for their nation-risking program of appeasement to a fascist madman).

    Give Trump a centimetre and he’ll take a mile. Give him two centimetres and he’ll take Greenland. Give him three centimetres and he’ll grab Alberta, too. Anyone who insists that Canada should confine itself to ornamental gestures of resistance to Trump (because anything that truly matters will make him mad) is a danger to themselves and the country.

    This all goes double for people aligned with other national parties: the way we get Carney to live up to his Davos speech is by pouncing any time he even hints that he might go back on his word, poaching his voters by campaigning on a promise to live up the Carney Doctrine (even if Carney won’t). Promising to live up to Carney’s Davos speech (even if Carney won’t) must be the central issue in every by-election and provincial race between now and the next federal election.

    When we talk about politics and especially political change, there’s often talk of “political will.” Politicians who break with their own record of weakness and compromise are said to be propelled by “political will.”

    It’s all very abstract sounding, but at root, political will is something quite tangible – it’s merely invisible until something gets in its way.

    Think of political will as something like the wind. You can’t tell how windy it is outside unless there’s something in the path of the wind, and then it’s obvious. For the past decade, there has been a growing worldwide political will blowing for an end to corporate and billionaire power:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/06/28/mamdani/#trustbusting

    It’s easy to feel like the project of taking our world back from oligarchs has been becalmed for decades. The political will is like the wind: we only see it when something gets in its path. After generations of Davos-style oligarch worship, there are damned few politicians who dare to unfurl a sail and aim the tiller for a world that works for working people.

    But every time some politician does, that sail bellies out with the wind with an audible snap. These politicians are lionized and lauded for their bravery, and any betrayal is met with bitter recriminations that go on and on and on. Any ship rigged for a better future is propelled by a wind that is a fiercer gale than any we’ve seen for generations.

    That’s where we all fit in. I’m not asking you to credulously accept Carney’s conversion at face value. Rather, I’m asking that you celebrate the vision that Carney articulated while threatening to destroy his political life if he breaks his word. Let every politician know that there is glory in standing up for us – and let them know that betrayal will see them tossed overboard, to drown in our wake.


    Hey look at this (permalink)



    A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

    Object permanence (permalink)

    #25yrsago Things My Girlfriend and I Have Argued About https://web.archive.org/web/20010604131027/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mil.millington/things.html

    #20yrsago Law enforcement professionals against the war on drugs https://web.archive.org/web/20060202103138/http://leap.cc/

    #20yrsago How DRM tries to resist uninstalling https://blog.citp.princeton.edu/2006/01/29/cd-drm-unauthorized-deactivation-attacks/

    #15yrsago EFF: FBI may have committed more than 40K intelligence violations since 9/11 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/eff-releases-report-detailing-fbi-intelligence

    #15yrsago AnarchistU Toronto: free school classes for February https://web.archive.org/web/20110126075027/https://anarchistu.org/

    #10yrsago Florida climate survivors travel to New Hampshire to confront Marco Rubio https://web.archive.org/web/20160201193104/https://act.climatetruth.org/sign/climatevoices2016_videoandpetition/?source=BB

    #10yrsago Elizabeth Warren’s new 1%: the percentage of fraudulent profits companies pay in fines https://web.archive.org/web/20160129113016/https://theintercept.com/2016/01/29/elizabeth-warren-challenges-clinton-sanders-to-prosecute-corporate-crime-better-than-obama/

    #5yrsago David Dayen’s MONOPOLIZED https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/29/fractal-bullshit/#dayenu

    #1yrago All bets are off https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/29/which-side-are-you-on-2/#strike-three-yer-out


    Upcoming appearances (permalink)

    A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



    A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

    Recent appearances (permalink)



    A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

    Latest books (permalink)



    A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

    Upcoming books (permalink)

    • “Unauthorized Bread”: a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, 2026
    • “Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It” (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026

    • “The Memex Method,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2026

    • “The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026



    Colophon (permalink)

    Today’s top sources:

    Currently writing: “The Post-American Internet,” a sequel to “Enshittification,” about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America (1004 words today, 15484 total)

    • “The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE.
    • “The Post-American Internet,” a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING.

    • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


    This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

    Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


    How to get Pluralistic:

    Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    Pluralistic.net

    Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

    Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

    Medium (no ads, paywalled):

    https://doctorow.medium.com/

    Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

    https://twitter.com/doctorow

    Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

    https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

    When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla” -Joey “Accordion Guy” DeVilla

    READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (“BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

    ISSN: 3066-764X