Author: tio

  • Georgia Deports Azerbaijani Journalist, Bypassing European Court Ruling

    The Georgian government deported an Azerbaijani journalist, forcibly returning him to his home country despite an explicit interim ruling by Europe’s top human rights court designed to halt his transfer.

    Afgan Sadigov, the editor-in-chief of the independent YouTube news channel Azel TV, fled to Georgia with his family following a severe crackdown on independent media and activists by the Azerbaijani government in December 2023. But his search for a safe haven unraveled after he published a Facebook post earlier this month criticizing Georgian law enforcement.

    “Wherever there is a dictatorship, police officers are ready to sell and trample everything for a salary and a police uniform, and they do it with love, dedication, and pride,” Sadigov wrote.

    He was detained on the night of April 4. The Georgian Interior Ministry later confirmed his deportation on Facebook, stating that Sadigov had been found guilty of insulting the police. A Georgian court handed him a 2,000 lari ($743) fine and a three-year ban on re-entering the country.

    The swift deportation appears to be the culmination of a months-long, cross-border legal battle. In August 2024, Sadigov was arrested in Georgia on extortion charges levied by Azerbaijani authorities—accusations that he and his supporters have consistently dismissed as politically motivated. 

    A Georgian court initially ordered his extradition. However, Sadigov’s legal team successfully appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg, which granted an injunction the following year to halt the transfer.

    To justify the sudden April 5 deportation, the Georgian Interior Ministry stated it had learned “a few days ago” that Azerbaijani authorities had halted their prosecution of Sadigov on the extortion charges. Because the extradition request was theoretically dropped, Georgian authorities argued that the Strasbourg court’s injunction was no longer relevant.

    Sadigov’s lawyer, Mariam Kvelashvili, vehemently rejected that legal maneuvering. Speaking to Monitori, the Georgia-based member center of the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), she argued that even if local proceedings in Azerbaijan were terminated, the European court’s interim measure did not automatically expire.

    “This is a kind of bypass—a formal bypass of the court’s decision—and of course, the European court will evaluate this as a violation,” Kvelashvili said. She emphasized that the ECHR “must deliberate separately on the termination or cancellation” of the order.

    “Furthermore, nowhere in the interim measure document is it stated that this issue is tied to the completion of the extradition case; on the contrary, the transfer itself is prohibited,” she added.

    The deportation has cast a chilling effect over the community of exiled dissidents in the Caucasus. Upon arriving in Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital, Sadigov was briefly freed, quickly detained by police again, and then released once more, according to a Facebook post by his wife, Sevinj.

    “In light of these events, there are sufficiently serious grounds for me to be concerned,” she wrote.

    The Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics, a Tbilisi-based nongovernmental organization dedicated to media integrity, issued a public statement condemning the government’s actions and expressing solidarity with the expelled editor.

    “The case of Afgan Sadygov shows how effectively authoritarian governments can cooperate against critically minded journalists to trample human rights and suppress freedom of expression,” the statement read.

    The timing of the deportation has also raised intense geopolitical questions. The day after the journalist was handed over to Azerbaijani authorities, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and First Lady Mehriban Aliyeva arrived in Tbilisi for an official visit.

  • Music Publishers Ask Court to Dismiss X’s ‘Weaponized DMCA’ Antitrust Suit

    Music Publishers Ask Court to Dismiss X’s ‘Weaponized DMCA’ Antitrust Suit

    Last week, X asked a federal court in Tennessee to dismiss a music piracy lawsuit, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cox v. Sony, rendered the music companies’ contributory infringement theory futile.

    The music publishers, meanwhile, were busy in a different court, asking a Texas judge to throw out X’s antitrust complaint against them with similar finality.

    The motion to dismiss, filed in the Northern District of Texas, argues that X’s lawsuit doesn’t hold up and the music companies want all eight counts dismissed with prejudice.

    A Conspiracy Built on One Word

    X filed its antitrust complaint in January, accusing the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) and a coalition of major music publishers, including Sony, Universal, and Warner Chappell, of coordinating a “weaponized” DMCA takedown campaign to coerce X into industry-wide licensing deals.

    The conspiracy claim rested heavily on a pre-litigation email sent by NMPA President David Israelite to Twitter in October 2021. X alleged that Israelite threatened a “massive program” of DMCA notices on a scale “larger than any previous effort in DMCA history” if X did not agree to a partnership.

    From X’s January complaint

    massive

    However, the publishers have now submitted the full email chain to the court, arguing that X’s complaint “selectively crops, paraphrases, and misconstrues” it. They note that the complete exchange tells a more nuanced story.

    In his October 6 email, Israelite warned Twitter that the NMPA was preparing a “massive program” of DMCA notices, adding that his “preference is not to go down that road, but instead to develop a partnership.” He closed by writing (emphasis added): “If you are interested in engaging in such a conversation, please let me know. If you choose not to do so, then please know we are open to starting a conversation at any point during the future process.”

    The first email

    email

    The publishers argue that X’s conspiracy theory rests almost entirely on that final word.

    “X argues that by using the word ‘we,’ NMPA meant that X could only deal with the Music Publishers collectively for a license and that no individual Music Publisher would negotiate separately. That inference is not only implausible, it is completely devoid of factual basis or allegation. An antitrust claim cannot rest on such a tenuous thread.”

    Same Judge, Same Problem

    One of the key reasons for a dismissal is the argument that there can be no antitrust injury, as X and the music publishers do not compete. The music companies argue that antitrust law requires a competitor to be involved in a refusal-to-deal claim.

    The argument has already succeeded once against X, in the same courthouse, before the same judge. In February, District Judge Jane Boyle dismissed X’s antitrust lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers with prejudice, finding that X had failed to allege antitrust injury because no competitor was involved in the alleged boycott.

    The publishers quote that ruling extensively and argue the present case is largely similar.

    “Specifically, X does not allege that any participant in the alleged conspiracy is its competitor, a necessary requirement for antitrust injury to flow from an alleged refusal to deal,” the motion states.

    The proposed order submitted alongside the motion has Judge Boyle’s name pre-filled.

    Retaliation, Not Antitrust

    The music publishers take their motion to dismiss beyond simply refuting X’s claims. They also suggest that X filed the antitrust suit as leverage in the copyright infringement case the music companies filed in the Tennessee federal court.

    “The paucity of factual allegations supporting an antitrust claim is no accident. X’s motivation in filing suit was different: retaliation and leverage for the copyright suit the Music Publishers filed against it, which is currently pending in Tennessee federal court,” the motion notes.

    X argues that the music companies sent a flood of “baseless” DMCA notices, targeting over 200,000 posts and suspending 50,000 users. However, the music publishers motion counters that none of the takedown notices was objectively baseless.

    The Sham Exception

    The music companies argue that their takedown campaign was a First Amendment-protected pre-litigation activity. They invoke the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which shields things such as pre-litigation notices and cease-and-desist letters from antitrust liability.

    DMCA takedown notices, they argue, fall in the same category, especially since these were used as key evidence in the the copyright lawsuit currently pending in Tennessee.

    This type of protection does not apply if the notices themselves are “baseless” or a “sham,” which X argued is the case here. The original complaint pointed to several examples, including a takedown notice targeting a video where the non-commercial use of background music was flagged as copyright infringement.

    The music companies, however, counter that X does and cannot claim that any notices were baseless. This includes the background music example: this may qualify for fair use defense, but the publishers add that “infringing use of incidental background music is still infringing.”

    All in all, the motion to dismiss concludes that the music companies used the DMCA as Congress intended, and that it is not an antitrust violation. The complaint should therefore be dismissed with prejudice on all counts.

    It is now up to Judge Boyle to decide whether the antitrust case can continue or whether it should be dismissed outright. The same is true for the Nashville case, where X asked the court to completely dismiss the music companies’ copyright infringement lawsuit.

    A copy of the motion to dismiss, filed April 2, 2026 at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, is available here (pdf). The supporting memorandum can be found here (pdf).

    From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

  • Politically Connected Crypto Project Pursued Resort With Alleged Scam Syndicate Figures

    Last November, a new blockchain network known as AB announced it had partnered with a company with an impeccable political pedigree: World Liberty Financial, a booming cryptocurrency firm co-owned by the family of U.S. President Donald Trump.

    The collaboration, which gave AB the right to carry on its online ledger one of the Trump family company’s signature products, a “stablecoin” pegged to the U.S. dollar, was just the latest in a string of bold announcements that associated the emerging AB network with high-profile figures from around the world.

    Launched just early last year, AB publicly touted a former president of Serbia as its “blockchain moderator.” Its philanthropic arm, an Irish-registered nonprofit foundation, lists about two dozen current and former world leaders as its advisers.  

    Until recently, AB also promoted online what it called a “flagship project” — a “blockchain theme resort” in Timor-Leste, a small and impoverished country in Southeast Asia. 

    Stretching out into the sea near Timor-Leste’s capital, Dili, the 300,000-square-meter development was billed as a place where the brightest minds in crypto would gather in luxury. The nonprofit would receive between five and 10 percent of its future profits.

    In a now-deleted online statement, the former Serbian leader Boris Tadić extolled AB’s resort as a future “worldwide nexus for industry collaboration and talent exchange.”

    An OCCRP and Guardian Australia investigation, however, has found that the planned resort involved three people who were later sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury in a crackdown on the Prince Group, a Cambodia-based conglomerate that it alleges is one of the world’s largest online scam syndicates.  

    The Prince Group has been accused by the U.S. of being part of an illicit industry that steals tens of billions of dollars from victims every year while operating massive scam compounds in converted hotels, office parks, and casinos across Southeast Asia. In what it dubbed its “largest forfeiture action” against online scammers, the U.S. government last year seized $15 billion worth of bitcoin from Prince Group’s CEO, Chen Zhi. (The Prince Group has said that it “categorically rejects the notion that it or its Chairman has engaged in any unlawful activity.”)

    There is no evidence that AB is directly connected to the Prince Group, or that illicit funds flowed into the resort project. The three sanctioned people involved with the resort have not been charged with any crime, and were removed from the Timor-Leste project shortly after the sanctions were announced, corporate documents and interviews show. 

    There is no suggestion that World Liberty, Tadić, or any other political figures were aware of sanctioned people’s prior involvement. 

    However, the revelations come amid concerns that Timor-Leste, a small country of just 1.4 million people located between Indonesia and Australia, is becoming a new target for scam syndicates. Tens of billions of dollars are believed to be stolen every year by the syndicates, who often operate out of large compounds in converted casinos, resorts, and office parks across Southeast Asia.

    According to a statement posted on one of AB’s websites on March 4, the Timor-Leste resort project was the result of a June memorandum of understanding between its “core entities” and a separate Timor-Leste-registered company, and was canceled in November before it reached “a substantive implementation stage.”

    “The MoU was only a preliminary intention and did not produce any substantive legal or financial consequences,” the statement said.

    Lawyers for World Liberty said the company is “committed to responsible practices and compliance.” They said World Liberty carried out due diligence on AB and was not made aware of the resort or people behind it.

    “Claims attempting to link World Liberty Financial with sanctioned individuals are unfounded and untrue,” they said. “[World Liberty] has no relationship or association with any of these sanctioned individuals or the Timor-Leste project.”

    Longtime Friends

    For much of its roughly year-long history, the corporate architecture behind the AB network has been cloaked in mystery. 

    OCCRP and Guardian Australia spent four months analyzing corporate records, flight manifests, text messages and photographs to identify key figures behind AB’s digital veneer. 

    As reporters began reaching out to people connected to the Timor-Leste project, promotional material for the resort was removed from AB’s websites and social media accounts. In its March post, published after reporters began their inquiries, AB for the first time clarified what it says is its structure. AB now describes itself as a “decentralized” ecosystem consisting of two companies that exist in the real world: an Irish nonprofit, and a foundation registered in the Cayman Islands, a secrecy jurisdiction that does not disclose directors or beneficial owners. 

    AB also purports to include two separate entities that are entirely virtual: an open-source blockchain, and a “decentralized autonomous organization” called AB DAO, which is governed by holders of its native cryptocurrency token.

    Reporters, however, were able to identify two ethnic Chinese businessmen who, after being contacted, described themselves as leading figures in separate parts of AB’s network. Neither of them appeared on AB’s publicity materials or on publicly available corporate documents. 

    One of them is Sui Chenggang, a Chinese software developer. After being contacted by reporters, Sui said that he was the “initiator of the AB ecosystem” and the beneficial owner of its financial arm, the Cayman Islands company AB Foundation. 

    Sui’s Caymans company was a formal party to the now-canceled agreement to pursue the Timor-Leste resort, according to documents obtained by reporters. A photograph obtained by reporters shows that the businessman, who goes by the name Jacky Sui, met World Liberty executives — including Donald Trump Jr. and Zach Witkoff, the son of Trump’s peace envoy — on the sidelines of a crypto conference in Singapore last October. 

    Sui’s “longtime friend” and another pivotal figure in the AB resort project in Timor-Leste is Lin Xiaofan, an enigmatic Guangdong-born entrepreneur who travels the world on a passport from the Caribbean nation of St. Kitts and Nevis.

    Reached by OCCRP and Guardian Australia, Lin confirmed that he played a leading role in the Timor-Leste resort project, and denied any connection to the Prince Group.

    “I have always despised those who run scam compounds,” he said.

    Reporters found that Lin facilitated some of AB’s connections to influential people, including Timor-Leste’s president. Lin said he served as an adviser to Tadić, the former Serbian leader. (In response to questions Tadić confirmed Lin served in this role. He said he was a supporter of the Timor-Leste resort, but had no role in it and was not aware of any involvement by sanctioned individuals.)

    Lin also said he was the “initiator” of AB’s Irish nonprofit, which is chaired by the country’s former leader, Bertie Ahern. (Ahern acknowledged to reporters that he met Lin and chairs the nonprofit. He said he had no knowledge of the resort project.)

    Lin denied playing any role in AB’s blockchain network. Lin did, however, say that it was he who introduced Sui to World Liberty executives.

    ‘Too Secretive’

    Timor-Leste is an unlikely setting for a cutting-edge crypto-themed property development.

    The country’s capital, Dili, is in many ways a throwback to earlier times. Battered mini buses trawl its dusty streets for passengers. Internet and mobile phone service is patchy, and power cuts are commonplace. Almost all day-to-day business in the country is done with paper U.S. dollars, the young country’s only legal currency. 

    In 2024, the digital future landed via a private jet.

    Lin, who often goes by the English name Frank, arrived with an entourage that included Fan Bingbing, a Chinese actress whose disappearance in 2018 made global headlines. (Fan reappeared in public several months later that year, reportedly posting a lengthy statement online apologizing for tax fraud and praising the Chinese Communist Party.)

    Once in Timor-Leste, Lin made a beeline for members of the local elite, including President Jose Ramos-Horta, a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and hero of the country’s quarter-century independence struggle against occupation by Indonesia.

    Speaking to reporters, Ramos-Horta described Lin as at times “too secretive” but well-connected. Lin appeared to be a “huge innovator” who was clearly in control during meetings, he said. 

    During an early meeting, Lin came bearing a gift of surveillance cameras and night vision equipment. On a subsequent visit, Lin and his entourage pitched their resort idea. 

    “They met with me and showed me the video. Very nice,” Ramos-Horta said.

    The president said he accepted an invitation from Lin to serve as an adviser to the AB’s nonprofit alongside his friend, the former Serbian leader Tadić.

    The resort concept was ambitious. According to mockups Lin shared with Timorese officials, the development was to be built next to Dili’s airport. Luxury overwater villas with private swimming pools would stretch out into the sea alongside a yacht club and “Sea Plaza.” 

    Last June, the Irish nonprofit, named AB Foundation Company Limited by Guarantee, and Sui’s Caymans company, AB Foundation, signed a memorandum of understanding to develop the project with a newly established Timorese company, AB Digital Technology Resort Lda.

    The following month, AB’s Irish nonprofit publicly announced a $500,000 donation to a local charity run by President Ramos-Horta. The money came directly from Lin.

    (Ahern, the nonprofit’s chair, said the organization has “no bank accounts or funds” and so its board never formally authorized the payment.)

    Later on that month, Ramos-Horta signed a letter recommending Lin be granted a Timorese diplomatic passport and given the title of special adviser to the president for economic and commercial affairs. The passport was issued that very same day, according to a copy of the document obtained by reporters.

    Ramos-Horta told reporters he gained no personal benefit from the donation to his charity and gave the passport to Lin in order to generate new “clean” investment for Timor-Leste. 

    “In a private conversation, [Lin] said he would like to move his business to Timor,” Ramos-Horta said. “And if his businesses are legitimate, as appear in some of his formal presentations, blockchain, high-tech, all of that. Yes, we would like to have that.”

    When reporters from OCCRP and Guardian Australia visited the resort’s proposed site — a sandy, weed-strewn lot near Dili’s airport — in February, there were no signs of construction. 

    Lin told reporters the project was still active. He was finalizing the resort’s design and recruiting a new general manager, he added.

    Lin also told reporters that AB is no longer part of the project and provided a copy of a November 27 letter terminating the agreement. (AB also stated in its March announcement that the MoU for the project was canceled last November, the month after the U.S. sanctions came out.)

    ‘Casual Dinner and Cigar Time’

    The link between the Timor-Leste resort and people sanctioned by the U.S. came via the local company set up last June to develop the project, AB Digital Technology Resort.

    Corporate records show the majority shareholder of the company, which was established with $10 million in capital, was Yang Jian, a Cyprus citizen of Chinese origin who was sanctioned by the U.S. in October for allegedly working with Prince’s CEO, Chen Zhi, to build a separate resort in the Pacific island nation of Palau. The project was described by the U.S. Treasury as a “predatory investment.”

    Yang Jian, who OCCRP recently revealed owns at least $17 million worth of London property, did not respond to questions.

    Lin provided documents showing a business agreement with Yang Jian was terminated on October 17, three days after the Prince Group sanctions were announced by the U.S. Treasury. Also on October 17, Yang Jian’s shareholding was transferred to a man Lin described as his “close friend” Ye Chengzhong, according to corporate records he provided.  

    “Yang Jian appeared as a nominee shareholder in the company registration documents … during the project’s preparation stage, but he never contributed any funds to the company,” Lin said.

    Two other people who were sanctioned alongside Yang Jian over the same Palau project also worked on the Timorese resort project, documents and interviews show.

    Yang Yanming, also known as Kimi Yang, represented himself as the resort company’s manager and carried a business card identifying himself as a director of AB Digital Technology Resort, according to a photograph obtained by reporters. He also traveled by private jet with Lin from Timor-Leste to Hong Kong last July, according to the flight manifest. 

    “I have no association whatsoever with the Prince Group,” Kimi Yang told reporters. He said he had met the Prince Group boss Chen Zhi two or three times but “just for casual dinner and cigar time.”

    Kimi Yang identified Shih Ting-yu, a sanctioned Taiwanese national also known as Vivian Shih, as working for him on the project. He said she was dismissed from the company after the sanctions came out.

    Reached by phone, Shih, who is currently under separate investigation in Taiwan over her alleged ties to the Prince Group, denied any knowledge of the Timorese resort project or any connection to the Prince Group. 

    “I don’t know about anything,” she said. “I just want to go back to my normal life.”

    While the three sanctioned people were quickly removed from AB Digital Technology Resort, records show the company continued to be 38-percent owned until mid-December by a Cyprus passport holder, Zhao Chen, who, according to records from the Mediterranean island country, became a citizen in 2018 as the wife of Hu Xiaowei. Hu, also known as Chen Xiao’er, is a sanctioned alleged Prince Group affiliate who, according to Taiwanese media, has been labeled by prosecutors there as Prince Group’s alleged “second in command.”

    Zhao also signed a cooperation agreement that kick-started the resort project. But Lin told OCCRP and Guardian Australia he did not know who Zhao was and had never been in contact with her. 

    Zhao and Hu, who have not been charged, did not respond to questions. 

    Timorese corporate records show Zhao was replaced as shareholder on December 11 by Hong Kong citizen Ching Ho Leung. Leung told reporters he was a relative of Lin’s friend Ye and provided a document showing that he was holding his shares in the company on behalf of Ye.

    Although Lin said he did not know Zhao, he confirmed to reporters that he was acquainted with Hu, the purported Prince Group number two.

    Lin initially told reporters that he had only met Hu once at a karaoke bar in London in 2022. But when pressed about a flight manifest and other evidence that indicated the two men had flown on a private jet out of Manila the following year, Lin confirmed he had “happened to run into” Hu in the Philippines. Flight records show the plane departed Manila airport on February 13, and stopped over in Dubai before continuing to St. Mortitz in Switzerland. The flight was the subject of an inquiry by the Philippines Senate after it emerged that Hu had been able to slip out of the country without being recorded in the original manifest. 

    “I took his aircraft as a courtesy ride,” Lin said, adding he was going to the European nation for a medical check-up.

    ‘The Testing Phase’

    Another aspect of the AB network’s business that remains prominently displayed online is its collaboration with World Liberty Financial, which was founded in 2024 by partners including companies affiliated with the Trump and Witkoff families. 

    The company is reported to have earned the two families roughly $1.4 billion since then, including through the adoption of its USD1 stablecoin. World Liberty’s deals, including an agreement to sell nearly half of its shares for half a billion dollars to an Emirati official with ties to the country’s intelligence apparatus, have raised criticisms from ethics and political experts that the first family could be putting the national interest at risk with its foreign partnerships.

    Both World Liberty and the White House have said that President Trump and Steve Witkoff, a longtime friend of the president who is now serving as his peace envoy, have no role in the company’s decision-making.

    Sui, the beneficial owner of AB’s Cayman Islands company, said he signed an MoU with World Liberty on September 17 last year after he was introduced to its executives by Lin. He refused to provide reporters with a copy of the document, citing its confidentiality provisions.

    “With respect to the specific transaction terms, the cooperation constitutes a normal commercial agreement between the two parties and includes standard provisions relating to technical cooperation and ecosystem collaboration,” Sui said, adding that it “does not involve any form of personal benefit transfer or hidden arrangements.”

    On October 14, a fortnight after Sui was photographed with Trump Jr. and the younger Witkoff, the U.S. announced its sanctions against the Prince Group. By the time AB and World Liberty announced their partnership, on November 12, the resort project remained on AB’s websites and social media accounts but the three sanctioned people had already been removed from the Timorese company, AB Digital Technology Resort.

    Sui said: “To the best of my recollection, the Timor-Leste resort project was not discussed” during conversations with World Liberty. 

    Although it is still in effect, the collaboration between AB and World Liberty has resulted in little increased uptake for USD1. Just over $3 million worth of the stablecoin is currently held by users of AB DAO’s main blockchain, a low volume that Sui attributes to the integration being “currently still in the testing phase.” 

    This pales in comparison to the more than $4.4 billion worth of USD1 currently circulating across all blockchains, part of an aggressive push by World Liberty for the adoption of the cryptocurrency over other stablecoins, such as the industry leader Tether.

    On the sidelines of a glitzy crypto forum the company hosted at the family resort in Mar-a-Lago on February 18, Trump Jr. and his brother, Eric, told media outlet CNBC that one goal of their stablecoin is to help maintain the dominance of the U.S. dollar in global finance.

    Another reason, Eric Trump said, was revenge for family members being dropped by traditional banks in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021 riot in the U.S. Capitol.

    “We’re the most canceled people in the world in 2020, 2021,” he said.

    “And it’s really great to almost have this retribution, where all of a sudden we start pushing an agenda, our agenda is to modernize finance to [make sure] that can never, ever happen to anybody again.”

  • Greek Premier Reshuffles Government Amid EU Subsidy Scandal

    Scrambling to contain the political fallout from a sprawling agricultural fraud investigation, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis reshuffled his government and urged European Union prosecutors to name lawmakers who are facing charges over allegations that his country has siphoned millions in EU subsidies for phantom livestock and ineligible farmland.

    The reshuffle is the latest development in a scandal centering on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) allegations that Greek stockbreeders have, since at least 2018, defrauded at at least 23 million euros ($27 million) by exploiting loopholes in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy to claim subsidies for non-existent livestock or land that failed to meet eligibility requirements. 

    The inquiry escalated in October 2025 following the detention of 37 members of an organized criminal group accused of defrauding the EU’s agricultural subsidy system of more than 19.6 million euros ($22.6 million).

    EU prosecutors then announced last week that they are investigating current and former MPs over their alleged involvement in the scheme, according to a statement by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The EPPO said it has referred information to the Hellenic Parliament regarding the potential involvement of also a former minister and a former deputy minister in the fraud scheme.

    A number of ministers resigned on Friday and new ministers were sworn in over the weekend. Margaritis Schinas, a former European Commission vice president, has been appointed as the new agriculture minister, said government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis, in a televised statement.

    The EPPO also requested that the Hellenic Parliament lift the parliamentary immunity of 11 members, adding that it is already investigating five former MPs. 

    Mitsotakis urged on Monday the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to “quickly” decide which of the accused Greek lawmakers will face prosecution.

  • World News in Brief: ‘Skyrocketing’ needs outpace Sudan funding, Ukraine strikes update, global water security

    The UN is significantly scaling up its presence in the Sudanese capital, Khartoum, to expand life-saving operations as the conflict between rival militaries approaches its third year.
  • Cuba energy crisis: Humanitarian needs remain despite fuel supplies

    The UN has issued an urgent call for international support as Cuba grapples with a ‘worsening’ humanitarian crisis fuelled by a prolonged energy blockade and the lingering devastation caused by Hurricane Melissa last year.
  • Guilt by Solidarity

    After Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the Trump administration declared a war on the left. The White House hosted a theatrical day-long press conference on the threat that antifa poses and issued new law enforcement guidance that instructed the FBI to closely monitor groups that oppose borders, capitalism, and traditional family values. While this fearmongering rhetoric has long invited mockery…

    Source

  • Pluralistic: Your boss wants to use surveillance data to cut your wages (06 Apr 2026)

    Today’s links



    A robot in an old fashioned frock coat. In one hand, he holds a giant magnifying glass. On the other stands a child laborer - a coal miner from the 1910s, squinting at the camera. Terrifying energy beams streak out of the robot's eyes into the glass and at the child. The background is an extremely dark, very roughed-up US $100 bill.

    Your boss wants to use surveillance data to cut your wages (permalink)

    What industry calls “personalized pricing” is really surveillance pricing: using digital tools’ flexibility to change the price for each user, and using surveillance data to guess the worst price you’ll accept:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/06/24/price-discrimination/

    At root, surveillance pricing allows companies to revalue both your savings and your labor. If you get charged $2 for something I only pay $1 for, the seller is essentially reaching into your bank account and revaluing the dollars in it at 50 cents apiece. If you get paid $1 for a job that I make $2 for, then the boss is valuing your labor at 50% of my labor:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/06/24/price-discrimination/#

    Surveillance pricing is a key part of enshittification, relying on three of the key enshittificatory factors that have transformed this era into the enshittocene:

    I. Monopoly: Surveillance pricing is undesirable to both workers and buyers, so in a competitive market, surveillance pricing would drive labor and consumption to non-surveilling rivals:

    https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/20/we-should-not-endure-a-king/

    II. Regulatory capture: Surveillance pricing only exists because of weak regulation and weak enforcement of existing regulations. To engage in surveillance pricing, a company must first put you under surveillance, something that is only possible in the absence of effective privacy law.

    In the USA, privacy law hasn’t been updated since Congress passed a law in 1988 that banned video-store clerks from disclosing your VHS rentals:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/10/31/losing-the-crypto-wars/#surveillance-monopolism

    In the EU, the strong privacy provisions in the GDPR have been neutralized by US tech giants who fly an Irish flag of convenience. Ireland attracts these companies by allowing them to evade their taxes, but it can only keep these companies by allowing them to break any law that gets in their way, because if Meta can pretend to be Irish this week, it could pretend to be Maltese (or Cypriot, Luxembourgeois, or Dutch) next week:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/15/finnegans-snooze/#dirty-old-town

    What’s more, competition laws in the EU and the USA ban surveillance pricing, but a half-century of lax competition law enforcement has allowed companies to routinely engage in the “unfair and deceptive methods of competition” banned in both territories.

    III. Twiddling: “Twiddling” is my word for the way that digitized businesses can use computers’ flexibility to alter their prices, offers, and other fundamentals on a per-user, per-session basis. It’s not enough to spy on users: to engage in surveillance pricing, you have to be able to mobilize that surveillance data from instant to instant, changing the prices for every user. This can only be done once a business has been digitized:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/19/twiddler/

    Combine monopoly, weak privacy law, weak competition law, and digitization, and you don’t just make surveillance pricing possible – at that point, it’s practically inevitable. This is what it means to create an enshittogenic policy environment: by arranging policy so that the most awful schemes of the worst people are the most profitable, you guarantee that those people will end up organizing commercial and labor markets.

    When surveillance pricing is applied to labor, we call it “algorithmic wage discrimination,” a term coined by Veena Dubal based on her research with Uber drivers:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/12/algorithmic-wage-discrimination/#fishers-of-men

    Uber uses historic data on drivers to make inferences about how economically precarious they are, and then extracts a “desperation premium” from their wages. Drivers who are pickier about which rides they accept (“pickers”) are offered higher wages than drivers who take any ride (“ants”):

    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4331080

    On the back-end, Uber is inferring that the reason an ant will accept a worse job is that they have fewer choices – they are more strapped for cash and/or have fewer options for earning a higher wage.

    This is a straightforward form of algorithmic wage discrimination, using the blunt signal of how discriminating a driver is when signing onto a job to titer the subsequent wage offered to that driver. More sophisticated forms of algorithmic wage discrimination draw on external sources of data to set the price of your labor.

    That’s the situation for contract nurses, whose traditional brick-and-mortar staffing agencies have been replaced by nationwide apps that market themselves as “Uber for nursing.” These apps use commercial surveillance data from the unregulated data-broker sector to check on how much credit card debt a nurse is carrying and whether that debt is delinquent to set a wage: the more debt you have and the more dire your indebtedness is, the lower the wage you are offered (and therefore the more debt you accumulate – lather, rinse, repeat):

    https://pluralistic.net/2024/12/18/loose-flapping-ends/#luigi-has-a-point

    Surveillance wages are now proliferating to other parts of the economy, as “consultancies” offer software to employers that let them set all parts of your compensation – base wage, annual raises, and bonuses – based on your perceived desperation, as derived from commercial surveillance data that has been collected about you:

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/employers-are-using-your-personal-data-to-figure-out-the-lowest-salary-youll-accept-c2b968fb

    Genna Contino’s Marketwatch article on the phenomenon offers a concise definition of “surveillance wages”:

    a system in which wages are based not on an employee’s performance or seniority, but on formulas that use their personal data, often collected without employees’ knowledge.

    This means that carrying a credit-card balance, taking out a payday loan, or even discussing your indebtedness on social media can all lead to lower wages in the future. Contino references a recent report released by Dubal and tech strategist Wilneida Negrón, surveying 500 large firms, which concluded that surveillance wages are now being offered in sectors as diverse as “healthcare, customer service, logistics and retail.” Customers for surveillance wage tools include “Intuit, Salesforce, Colgate-Palmolive, Amwell and Healthcare Services Group”:

    https://equitablegrowth.org/how-artificial-intelligence-uncouples-hard-work-from-fair-wages-through-surveillance-pay-practices-and-how-to-fix-it/

    After a brief crackdown under Biden, the Trump regime has been extraordinarily welcoming to surveillance pricing companies, dropping investigations and cases against firms that engaged in the practice. A few states are stepping in to fill the gap, with New York state passing a rule requiring disclosure of surveillance pricing – a modest step that was nevertheless fought tooth-and-nail by the state’s businesses.

    In Colorado, a new House bill called the “Prohibit Surveillance Data to Set Prices and Wages Act” would prohibit the use of personal information in wage-setting:

    https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1264

    This bill hasn’t passed yet, but it’s already doing useful work. Companies universally deny using surveillance data to set wages, insisting that they merely pay for consulting services that give them advice on how they could do surveillance wages – but don’t actually take that advice. However, these same companies – including Uber and Lyft – are ferociously lobbying against the bill, raising an obvious question, articulated by the bill’s co-sponsor Rep Javier Mabrey (D-1): if these companies don’t pay surveillance wages, then “what is the problem of codifying in law that you’re not allowed to?”

    Surveillance wages are a rare profitable use-case for AI, in part because surveillance wages don’t need to be “correct” in order to be effective. An employee who is offered a wage that’s slightly higher than the lowest sum they’d accept still represents a savings to the company’s wage-bill. As ever, AI is great for fully automating tasks if you don’t care whether they’re done well:

    https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/22/nobodys-home/#squeeze-that-hog

    The fact that surveillance wages are calculated by external contractors enables employers to engage in otherwise illegal price-fixing. If all the garages in town set mechanics’ wages using the same surveillance pricing tool, then a mechanic looking for a job will get the same lowball offer from all nearby employers. If those bosses were to gather around a table and fix the wage for any (or all) mechanics, that would be wildly illegal, but the fact that this is done via a software package lets the bosses claim they’re not actually colluding.

    This is a common practice in other forms of price-fixing. We see it in meat, potato products, and, of course, rental accommodations (hey there, Realpage!). It’s a genuinely stupid ruse based on the absurd idea that “it’s not a crime if we do it with an app”:

    https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/25/potatotrac/#carbo-loading

    Speaking of crimes that are implausibly deniable when undertaken with an app: surveillance wages also allow employers to offer lower wages to women and brown and Black people while maintaining the pretense that they’re in compliance with laws banning gender and racial discrimination.

    In the wider economy, women and racialized people are already offered lower wages and – thanks to the legacy of racial discrimination in employment and housing – are more likely to be indebted:

    https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/06/the-rents-too-damned-high/

    By tapping into data brokers’ dossiers that reveal the economic precarity of jobseekers, surveillance pricing allows employers to systematically lower the wages of women and Black and brown people, who have the highest incidence of indebtedness, while still claiming to offer race- and gender-blind wages. This is a phenomenon that Patrick Ball calls “empiricism washing”: first, move the illegal racist discrimination into an algorithm, then insist that “numbers can’t be racist.”

    But this isn’t just about lowering wages at the bottom of the employment market. In recent history, the employers most eager to illegally lower their workers’ wages are tech bosses, who had to pay massive fines for illegally colluding on “no poach” agreements to suppress the earning power of high-paid computer programmers:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation

    (This is why the tech industry is so horny for AI – tech bosses can’t wait to fire a ton of programmers and use the resulting terror to force down the wages of the remaining tech workers:)

    https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/05/fisher-price-steering-wheel/#billionaire-solipsism

    Which means that the very programmers who write and maintain the surveillance wage software used on the rest of us are especially likely to have the tools they created turned on them.


    Hey look at this (permalink)



    A shelf of leatherbound history books with a gilt-stamped series title, 'The World's Famous Events.'

    Object permanence (permalink)

    #20yrsago Arthur C Clarke fights Buddhist monks over Daylight Savings Time http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4865972.stm

    #20yrsago What parts of the .COM space are registered? https://web.archive.org/web/20060411133458/https://www.yafla.com/dforbes/2006/03/29.html

    #20yrsago Bomb squad called out to “defuse” life-size Super Mario power-ups https://web.archive.org/web/20060405034455/http://www.recordpub.com/article.php?pathToFile=archive/04012006/news/&file=_news1.txt&article=1&tD=04012006

    #20yrsago Poems showing the absurdities of English spelling https://web.archive.org/web/20060405223008/https://www.spellingsociety.org/news/media/poems.php

    #20yrsago Isaac Newton’s alchemical “chymistry” notebook scans https://web.archive.org/web/20060612203137/http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/newton/index.jsp

    #20yrsago Poems showing the absurdities of English spelling https://web.archive.org/web/20060405223008/https://www.spellingsociety.org/news/media/poems.php

    #20yrsago Isaac Newton’s alchemical “chymistry” notebook scans https://web.archive.org/web/20060612203137/http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/newton/index.jsp

    #15yrsago Misleading government stats and the innumerate media who repeat them https://www.badscience.net/2011/04/anarchy-for-the-uk-ish/

    #15yrsago US Customs’ domain-seizure program blocks free speech, leaves alleged pirates largely unscathed https://torrentfreak.com/us-governments-pirate-domain-seizures-failed-miserably-110403/

    #15yrsago Misleading government stats and the innumerate media who repeat them https://www.badscience.net/2011/04/anarchy-for-the-uk-ish/

    #15yrsago US Customs’ domain-seizure program blocks free speech, leaves alleged pirates largely unscathed https://torrentfreak.com/us-governments-pirate-domain-seizures-failed-miserably-110403/

    #10yrsago Panama Papers: Largest leak in history reveals political and business elite hiding trillions in offshore havens https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/the-panama-papers-how-the-worlds-rich-and-famous-hide-their-money-offshore

    #10yrsago America’s teachers are being trained in a harsh interrogation technique that produces false confessions https://web.archive.org/web/20160404143447/https://www.alternet.org/education/why-are-k-12-school-leaders-being-trained-coercive-interrogation-techniques

    #10yrsago LA’s new rule: homeless people are only allowed to own one trashcan’s worth of things https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-apartments-demolished-20160402-story.html
    #10yrsago Save Netflix! https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/save-netflix

    #10yrsago The TSA spent $1.4M on an app to tell it who gets a random search https://kevin.burke.dev/kevin/tsa-randomizer-app-cost-336000/

    #10yrsago Iceland’s Prime Minister says he won’t resign, mass demonstrations gain momentum https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/politics_and_society/2016/03/31/anti_government_demo_planned_for_monday/

    #10yrsago Panama Papers reveal the tax-avoidance strategies of David Cameron’s father https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/04/panama-papers-david-cameron-father-tax-bahamas

    #10yrsago Studio sculpts giant coin, photographs it alongside normal objects to make them look tiny https://skrekkogle.com/projects/50c/

    #5yrsago China’s antitrust surge https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/03/ambulatory-wallets/#sectoral-balances

    #5yrsago Consumerism won’t defeat Georgia’s Jim Crow https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/03/ambulatory-wallets/#christmas-voting-turkeys

    #1yrago End-stage capitalism https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/04/anything-that-cant-go-on/#forever-eventually-stops


    Upcoming appearances (permalink)

    A photo of me onstage, giving a speech, pounding the podium.



    A screenshot of me at my desk, doing a livecast.

    Recent appearances (permalink)



    A grid of my books with Will Stahle covers..

    Latest books (permalink)



    A cardboard book box with the Macmillan logo.

    Upcoming books (permalink)

    • “The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/)
    • “Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It” (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2026

    • “The Post-American Internet,” a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

    • “Unauthorized Bread”: a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, 2027

    • “The Memex Method,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027



    Colophon (permalink)

    Today’s top sources:

    Currently writing: “The Post-American Internet,” a sequel to “Enshittification,” about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. First draft complete. Second draft underway.

    • “The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to AI,” a short book for Farrar, Straus and Giroux about being an effective AI critic. LEGAL REVIEW AND COPYEDIT COMPLETE.
    • “The Post-American Internet,” a short book about internet policy in the age of Trumpism. PLANNING.

    • A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING


    This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

    Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.


    How to get Pluralistic:

    Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    Pluralistic.net

    Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

    Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

    https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

    Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

    https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

    Medium (no ads, paywalled):

    https://doctorow.medium.com/

    Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

    https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

    When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla” -Joey “Accordion Guy” DeVilla

    READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (“BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

    ISSN: 3066-764X

  • Antivax tech bro Steve Kirsch uses AI to rediscover the Jock Doubleday challenge

    Everything old is new again, even when AI is involved, as a very old antivax trope is rediscovered for a new generation.

    The post Antivax tech bro Steve Kirsch uses AI to rediscover the Jock Doubleday challenge first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.

  • I Fought, Tooth and Nail

    I Fought, Tooth and Nail

    1986 saw me withdraw at home from massive amounts of prescribed benzodiazepines, namely Ativan (lorazepam).  The need to withdraw had come about after I had a10 year iatrogenic dependence, and although it came to an end, I was left bed bound, house bound and I lost 50% of my body weight. I was very seriously ill. I was left with a complete 10 year memory loss, from aged 32 to 42.

    Fast forward into the future.

    I have spent my time and energies campaigning on the issue of iatrogenic harm from prescribed benzodiazepines. I have given evidence in the House of Commons, and I gave a speech on benzodiazepines to the same House. I travelled to Brussels, to the headquarters of the EU to meet with the European Health Minister, appearing on all the major TV Channels. In 2004/5, I was instrumental in setting up a dedicated benzodiazepine drug withdrawal service here in Oldham where I live, for the then estimated 5,200 long term dependent patients, running a national helpline service from home aided by my wife Sue. I was privileged to receive an invitation to attend a meeting at Buckingham Palace accompanied by Sue and I was awarded the 2007 ‘Man of Oldham’ trophy for my voluntary drug awareness campaign and advocacy work. I have attended many national drug conferences and frequently had the opportunity to contribute with my speeches.

    This coming August Sue and myself will celebrate 58 years of marriage.

    This is an extract taken from my speech at Portcullis House, House of Commons July 9 2013 at a Prescribed Drug Seminar.

    In 1976 I had a mental health breakdown at the age of 32, I was holding down two jobs at the time.  Studying for my Accountancy Technicians Exams, which I passed with Distinction and being a Dad to my two daughters aged seven and six.  I was then prescribed Librium and Valium for 5 years.  In 1981 my doctors in their wisdom prescribed me 10 mgs of Ativan daily, increased to 20 mgs, then to 30 mgs daily. So by 1985, I was being prescribed 30 mgs of Ativan.  Which equates to 300 mgs of Diazepam AND 12 x 30 mgs daily of Dihydrocodeine tablets for the severe headaches, caused by the Ativan.  All GP prescribed.  No misuse by me but misuse of me by my then doctors.

    “By now the drugs had had turned me very violent and aggressive. Looking for fights.

    “I am a mild-mannered former Accountant but these drugs turned me into a monster.   The turning point came in late 1985 when I almost hit my wife Sue, whom I love dearly. In that short lucid moment, I realised that it was the drugs causing my abnormal behaviour. I knew then that I had to get off them, or die, or lose my wife and my family.  So I withdrew myself at home over a 14 month period, with no help from my doctors.  They ran away from the very problem they had created.

    “I became drug free on the 19th of March 1986.

    “By this time by weight had dropped from 14 and a half stone down to 7 stone.  I would not put a single person through the hell that I went through to withdraw from these highly dependence forming drugs.   When I finally (awoke) out of my 10 year drug induced coma, my then two small daughters were all grown up.  I have no memories at all, my memory bank has been wiped clean from 32 to 42 years of age……….   1976 to 1986 is a total void in my life.”

    All the points I made which referred to the events in my life from 1976 to1986 were confirmed by my wife Sue and my later inspection of my medical records.  For several years after my withdrawal, I had so much pent-up anger at the doctors responsible, but I realised I had to let go of this injustice or it would destroy me.  So that’s what I did. Instead, I re-directed my emotional energy as I started to research the issues involved, actively campaigned to help others and I have continued to do so ever since.

    In 2017 I received an email from Dr Ian Wilkinson:

    Just to let you know Barry, that i will no longer be the Chief Clinical officer of Oldham CCG.  Thank you for your ongoing support of CCG and PCT previously.

    You have championed the cause of prescribed drug dependency locally, nationally and internationally more than anyone and it was always with pride that we had someone like yourself as a champion from Oldham.

    The cause will get the recognition and success it deserves.

    The Oldham set up was described as an example of ‘good practice’ by the BMA.  Government could quite easily have duplicated the Oldham set up throughout the country but chose not to.  It is cost effective and an efficient use of resources and it ran until 2018 by Addiction Dependency Solutions (ADS ) Manchester.  Indeed, it was further extended to treat those patients who had problems with z drugs, painkillers and antidepressants.

    Government could find huge monies to fund illegal drug addicts but not patients caught in the web of iatrogenic drug dependency.   The latter is on a much greater scale than the former and would seriously have embarrassed Government, the Medical Profession and of course Pharma super profits from prescribed drugs.  This medical disaster could have been averted but the lid was sealed tight in order to protect the guilty parties and the REAL TRUTH on the dangers of benzodiazepines to the patients.  The nub of the issue,  Government will fund dedicated national services for illegal drug addicts but not for legal drug addiction ( iatrogenic ) dependency.

    Ray Nimmo’s  benzo site on benzo.org.uk has a comprehensive archive section on my interviews with the Oldham Evening Chronicle going back years.

    I have presented evidence to 3 different Health Enquiries, (although benzos were only small part of this). In 2017 after a Benzo meeting in Oldham I asked both Debbie Abrahams MP and Andy Burnham, Mayor of Manchester if they would support me to seek a Government Enquiry into Benzodiazepines.  Both said NO in unison.

    Hillsborough and the Post Office received an Enquiry but we, the victims and our families could not seek the public truth.

    After 2017, because of my worsening general health and my permanent brain damage including the fact that the daily chronic migraines were intensifying, I have had to pull back a lot from campaigning.  Plus, I will be 83 years young later this summer.

    Nevertheless, despite my age and my infirmities I continue to help and assist people on FB as much as I can, all on a voluntary basis and as a labour of love. Currently I am helping folk from the USA, Japan, Germany, Ireland and England.  My wife also continues to pitch in to help others.

    We are the HAZZIES and make a good Team.

    It is clear that our government and the DoH had no intention of tackling the benzo crisis and have swept the issue under the carpet.   They have deliberately associated illegal drug misuse with iatrogenic drug dependence to muddy the waters and put the ‘blame’ on patients.

    Total cowardice.

    The next huge medical prescribed drug disaster is already with us in the form of the SSRI’s. That is another story for another day.

    Benzodiazepines are neuro toxic prescribed drugs and have ruined, not only my life but my family’s life too but I fought back from hell, with ‘tooth and nail’ and continue to fight for government to provide proper recognition of this medical disaster, for change in both the prescribing habits of doctors and for action to put right iatrogenic harm.

    ****

    Mad in the UK hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.

    The post I Fought, Tooth and Nail appeared first on Mad in the UK.