Author: tio
-
The image from Gaza that still haunts me: Palestine relief agency chief
Asking the softly spoken, veteran humanitarian worker Philippe Lazzarini how he feels as he comes to the end of his second term as the head of the UN agency for Palestinians, UNRWA, is perhaps an unfair question. -
Airstrike on funeral underscores rising civilian toll in Sudan
Fears are mounting for civilians caught up in Sudan’s deadly war between rival militaries as attacks intensify and humanitarian access shrinks, following a deadly airstrike on a funeral gathering in West Kordofan. -
Landlord Distress Isn’t Our Fault, But It Is Our Problem
The rental housing market is facing financial distress, with landlords in all corners of the country scrambling to pay back their investors. Unable to realize enough profit from their portfolios to meet financial obligations, these landlords are deferring maintenance, going into foreclosure, and resorting to fire-sales of properties. But unless something changes, tenants will bear the brunt of…
-
Hong Kong Raids Target Triad Bid-Rigging in Building Contracts
Hong Kong authorities have arrested 42 people in an anti-corruption sweep targeting suspected triad involvement in rigging lucrative building maintenance and fire safety contracts.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) said a consultancy firm collaborated with triad-linked middlemen to manipulate public tenders through bribery. The alleged scheme affected at least three projects, including a $2.6 million maintenance contract on Hong Kong Island and a Kowloon fire safety project priced at roughly $180,000—double the standard market rate.
Investigators said their early intervention likely prevented further corruption in two pending projects valued at over $20.4 million combined. The operation also uncovered potential safety violations connected to a previously completed contract.
-

Judge Allows BitTorrent Seeding Claims Against Meta, Despite Lawyers ‘Lame Excuses’
Over the past two years, rightsholders of all kinds have filed lawsuits against companies that develop AI models.
Most of these cases allege that AI developers used copyrighted works to train LLMs without first obtaining authorization.
Meta is among a long list of companies now being sued for this allegedly infringing activity. This includes a class action lawsuit filed by authors including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, and Christopher Golden, which accused Meta of using libraries of pirated books as training material.
Court Dismisses AI Training Claims
Last summer, Meta scored a key victory in this case, as the court concluded that using pirated books to train its Llama LLM qualified as fair use, based on the arguments presented in this case. This was a bittersweet victory, however, as Meta remained on the hook for downloading and sharing the books via BitTorrent.
By downloading books from shadow libraries such as Anna’s Archive, Meta relied on BitTorrent transfers. In addition to downloading content, these typically upload data to others as well. According to the authors, this means that Meta was engaged in widespread and direct copyright infringement.
In recent months, the lawsuit continued based on this remaining direct copyright infringement claim. While this was unfolding, the authors’ legal team also ‘discovered’ a new claim
Authors Pivot to Seeding Claim
Last December, the authors, through their attorneys, requested leave to file a fourth amended complaint. Specifically, they want to add a contributory copyright infringement claim, alleging that Meta facilitated third-party copyright infringement by seeding pirated books to others.
While the BitTorrent angle is not new, the authors previously only included a ‘distribution’ claim based on direct copyright infringement. This claim has a higher evidence standard, as it typically requires evidence that the infringer shares a whole work with a third party.
Since BitTorrent transfers break up files into smaller chunks before they are shared, it might be difficult to prove that a whole work is shared. However, the same transfers can be evidence that an infringer facilitated torrent transfers to third parties.
Anna’s Archive torrents (illustrative) 
Court Grants BitTorrent Pivot, Despite Doubletalk
This week, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria granted the motion, but made little effort to hide his frustration with how plaintiffs’ counsel handled it.
The judge acknowledged that the contributory infringement claim could and should have been added back in November 2024, when the authors amended their complaint to include the distribution claim. After all, both claims arise from the same factual allegations about Meta’s torrenting activity.
“The lawyers for the named plaintiffs have no excuse for neglecting to add a contributory infringement claim based on these allegations back in November 2024,” Judge Chhabria wrote.
The lawyers of the book authors claimed that the delay was the result of newly produced evidence that had “crystallized” their understanding of Meta’s uploading activity. However, that did not impress the judge.
He called it a “lame excuse” and “a bunch of doubletalk,” noting that if the missing discovery truly prevented the contributory claim from being added in November 2024, the same logic would have prevented the distribution claim from being added at that time as well.
“Rather than blaming Meta for producing discovery late, the plaintiffs’ lawyers should have been candid with the Court, explaining that they missed an issue in a case of first impression..,” the order reads.
Lame excuse… 
Judge Chhabria went further, noting that the authors’ law firm, Boies Schiller, showed “an ongoing pattern” of distracting from its own mistakes by attacking Meta. He pointed specifically to the dispute over when Meta disclosed its fair use defense to the distribution claim, which we covered here recently, characterizing it as a false distraction.
“The lawyers for the plaintiffs seem so intent on bashing Meta that they are unable to exercise proper judgment about how to represent the interests of their clients and the proposed class members,” the order reads.
Counsel “Lucked Into” a Pass
Despite the criticism, Chhabria granted the motion. The judge anticipated the obvious question from readers of his order.
“By now, the reader might be thinking, ‘Wait a minute, you started off saying that the motion to amend the complaint was difficult. It seems like an easy deny to me,’” Chhabria wrote.
Wait a Minute… 
The primary reason to grant the motion is the risk to the other potential members of the class action. If the contributory infringement claim were excluded and the class later lost on the distribution claim at trial, those class members could potentially be barred from ever bringing the contributory claim separately.
A second factor also made the decision easier. Meta has separately requested the court to align the schedule in this case with a separate but similar lawsuit filed by Entrepreneur Media. This case covers a similar contributory infringement claim and shares discovery the authors’ lawsuit. Granting the motion to amend, therefore, adds little practical burden to Meta.
However, the judge stresses that this is the result of luck, rather than the skill of the authors’ counsel.
“Plaintiffs’ counsel has lucked into a situation where Meta will not be meaningfully prejudiced by the failure to add a contributory infringement claim back in November 2024,” Chhabria wrote.
The authors’ motion to open the class discovery process was denied. That will only be considered if the named plaintiffs survive the next round of summary judgment on both the distribution and contributory infringement claims.
For now, the case moves forward with a fourth amended complaint, three new loan-out companies added as named plaintiffs, and a growing list of BitTorrent-related claims for Judge Chhabria to resolve.
—
A copy of the order, filed at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is available here (pdf).
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
-
Former Trump Energy Official Settled ‘Conflict of Interest’ Probe with Payment but No Liability
Before Andrew “Drew” Horn became a media fixture promoting the U.S. acquisition of Greenland’s critical minerals, he was an Energy Department official investigated for alleged misuse of his government position.
In July 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) announced that Horn had agreed to pay $59,000 “to resolve allegations that he violated conflict-of-interest rules prior to his departure from the agency in 2021.”
The DoJ noted that there was “no determination of liability.”
Horn was alleged to have used his official position to drum up future business just before leaving the government at the end of the first administration of President Donald Trump in January 2021.
The settlement agreement left key questions unanswered. What companies was Horn promoting, to whom, and what was he promising?
Now, OCCRP has obtained documents and emails that provide answers. The documents include letters of interest written by Horn on government letterhead. These underpinned the Justice Department investigation, which alleged Horn participated in government matters involving a private company at the same time he was negotiating a private-sector role with them.
Horn denied any wrongdoing and told reporters the settlement with the DoJ “resolved” those allegations.
“It put the issue to bed so that it couldn’t be used as sort of an allegation that could be damaging from a business perspective,” Horn said in an interview in Copenhagen, later telling OCCRP he did not behave unethically.
The settlement with the DoJ did not name the companies Horn allegedly sought to benefit from his government perch. The documents seen by OCCRP identify companies that correspond to the DoJ descriptions, while emails reveal the identities of individuals to whom Horn was pitching business opportunities.
Horn said he “never violated any sort of ethical constraints or did anything that even constituted the start of a conflict of interest.”
“I will say that there’s been various allegations made about me in part due to my past work and perceived, you know, closeness to President Trump,” he told the Danish newspaper Berlingske, OCCRP’s media partner.
In the final settlement, the DoJ explicitly stipulated that the mutual agreement was not “a concession by the United States that its claims are not well founded.”
Opportunity in Emergency
Horn’s actions at the tail end of the first Trump presidency came amidst concerns that China’s control over much of the global critical minerals supply threatened U.S. national security.
That security argument has carried over into the current Trump government, and Horn — now a private citizen — has been at the forefront of efforts to mine rare earth minerals in Greenland, and has spoken about it to the media.
“Rare earth” deposits contain minerals essential for manufacturing some electronics, including for green energy and defense technology.
OCCRP recently reported on GreenMet, which is part-owned and co-founded by Horn and has rare earth interests in Greenland. The company was created with the involvement of two men who previously worked with the Trump Organization: the company’s former executive vice president, George Sorial, and security chief Keith Schiller. Sorial and Schiller previously told OCCRP that they remain passive investors in GreenMet.
Back in September 2020, the Trump administration issued an executive order declaring American reliance on Chinese minerals a national emergency. It directed the federal government to promote a domestic supply chain.
In the waning weeks of the first Trump administration, from the end of 2020 into 2021, Horn drafted several official letters of interest. The letters expressed the government’s desire to support critical minerals projects needed for defense and green energy sectors.
Horn signed three letters on the Department of Energy letterhead five days before he left his position in the Trump administration. One company is named in three letters of interest as VUONG Holdings.
None of the companies named in the letters were accused of any wrongdoing, according to documents available to reporters.
Details of VOUNG Holdings in the letters match the description of a firm referred to in the DoJ settlement with Horn as “Company 1.” It was described as “a privately owned company focused on investments concerning certain minerals critical for national security and economic stability.”
The company was founded by Vinh Vuong, a Pennsylvania entrepreneur who knew Sorial. In a September 2020 Instagram post, Vuong described Sorial as his “dear friend and business partner.” The two also overlapped when they worked with the Washington D.C. lobbying firm Lucas Compton.
A spokesperson for VOUNG Holdings told OCCRP that the company had “responded to any and all federal inquiries fully and completely.”
At the same time Horn wrote letters of interest for VUONG Holdings, he “was also negotiating anticipated post-government employment with the Chief Executive Officer of Company 1,” the DoJ settlement said.
While Horn told reporters he could not discuss the specifics of the DoJ settlement, he said competitors had made “a lot of allegations that are outlandish” about him.
“I will say I never violated any sort of ethical constraints or did anything that even constituted the start of a conflict of interest,” he added.
In one of the letters of interest, Horn proposed a partnership between VUONG Holdings and another firm, which is referred to in the DoJ settlement as “Company 2.” That firm matches the description in the letter of interest of a firm called Grimstone Mining LLC.
Grimstone said it was not investigated or contacted by any law enforcement body, and did not ask Horn to send any letter.
Companies 1 and 2
Incorporated in Delaware but doing business in West Virginia, Grimstone Mining specialized in extracting rare earth minerals from scrap, a mix of rock, toxic waste and low quality coal left over from mining.
In one of his letters of interest, Horn promoted a partnership between Grimstone and VUONG Holdings involving “mineral recovery effort.” That’s news to Grimstone.
“There was no partnership, joint venture, or business agreement with VOUNG,” Frederic Mendelsohn, Grimstone’s attorney, told OCCRP. “Further, there is not and never has been direct contact between Grimstone and VUONG.”
But VUONG Holdings told OCCRP a meeting with Grimstone took place while Horn was still in his government position.
“VUONG Holdings was approached about a potential investment in the Grimstone Mining LLC project. After due diligence, VUONG Holdings declined to move forward,” the company statement said.
In a separate statement to OCCRP via a spokesperson, VUONG said that “Mr. Sorial introduced VUONG Holdings to Grimstone and Mr. Horn did participate in an introductory meeting. But VUONG added, “nothing came from it.”
In the letter obtained by OCCRP dated January 15, 2021 — five days before the end of the first Trump term — Horn expressed the “official interest” of the U.S. government in purchasing 10 million tons of scrap from the “VUONG-Grimstone partnership” at $100 per ton, a deal that would total $1 billion.
Analyses, he said, revealed Grimstone’s “stockpiles of coal inventory have a mineral value in excess of $3.5 billion.”
In January 2021, just 10 days after Horn left the government following Trump’s defeat in the presidential election, he sent an email from his personal address to Sorial and Schiller — the former Trump Organization executives who would later join him in forming GreenMet, and pursuing mineral deals in Greenland.
Under the subject heading “New Firm,” he explained that he was looking at projects both domestically and in Greenland, and singled out Grimstone.”
“The Grimstone opportunity looks great,” Horn told the two men in the email obtained by OCCRP.
Sorial and Schiller did not respond to a request for comment.
Horn wrote that he could get a $500 million loan from financier Erik Bethel from his investment fund.
Horn wrote that Bethel’s “viewpoint is that if we can secure Letters of Intent from the government for some of the larger projects, he can then lend the money from his private investment fund to get started.”
Shortly before that email, while still in government, Horn had written just such a letter of interest for Grimstone.
Bethel told OCCRP he had never heard of Grimstone, and denied there was any arrangement for a loan.
“I don’t do business with Drew Horn and never have,” Bethel said.
Horn declined to further discuss the case and referred future questions to his lawyer, whom he copied on the email.
Neither Horn nor his lawyer answered questions about his relationship with Bethel.
Eva Jung of Berlingske contributed reporting.
-
RFK Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines (part 10): An RFK Jr. ally tells us what’s coming next
ICAN attorney and antivaxxer Aaron Siri recently petitioned HHS to add 300 “injuries” to the Vaccine Injury Table for the Vaccine Injury Compensation System. It’s all part of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s plan to undermine and destroy the system, thus driving vaccine manufacturers out of the market.
The post RFK Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines (part 10): An RFK Jr. ally tells us what’s coming next first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.
-

Finding support outside ‘the system’
Another blog from the author known as ‘White boy’
This is the story of how a friend who wasn’t a mental health professional saved me from suicide by supporting me in a way my parents and the professionals hadn’t.
I’ve survived. Now, I must recover.
While I consider how I’m going to tackle this, I keep getting lost in the opening line of Philip Larkin’s poem, ‘They fuck you up, your mum and dad’. For the first time in my life I’m forced to consider that part of what I am is an uncomfortable heritage – the constraints of kin and religion. God knows how I’m held together, but I must get on with it. If I can’t understand it, I have to accept it – those are my options.
Sadly, conventional therapy didn’t work for me. There are others for whom it hasn’t worked and I hope my insights and thoughts might help them and their families and the professionals caring for them.
Looking back, there are three things at the top of my list of things I wish I’d done earlier in life. I wish (i) I’d read a lot more, for self-directed personal development and enlightenment (ii) I’d understood that anxiety has a natural purpose and that nature put the instrument inside me for a reason (iii) I’d learned more about humanity, its nature and its history.
I’m still undecided what went wrong. I was there, it happened to me, but I’m not sure what the something was. I can’t even say that my memory is flooded by tears of nostalgia because my memory is non-existent below the age of 5 years and from 6 to 11 years it’s pretty vague. And, yet, I’m reliant on my memory to judge the veracity of my own memory, while the childhood I can’t fully remember clings to me. It’s no wonder some people hand the controls to God.
What I do know, crystal clear, as if it were yesterday, one night a wave of sadness and anxious foreboding swept over me. It was a feeling I was not able to talk about or process. Before I knew it, I was in ‘The System’, at the age of 12. The system is a huge network of trained professionals who pride themselves on being experts in dealing with human distress – they are effectively ‘professional parents’. They have carved out a lucrative role for themselves by turning everyday human distress into mental illness – and people like me into vulnerable dependent clients.
Over the next 30 years, I lost count of the number of therapists I moved between– it was endless. I experienced everything the system has to offer. No one seemed to acknowledge or appreciate how disgusted I was with myself, how stigmatised I felt and how I hated any reference to it. The professionals diagnosed me with six mental health disorders including ‘schizophrenia’, ‘bipolar’ and ‘ADHD’. They sectioned me and detained me against my will on three separate occasions.
I was clueless to the fact that some of their actions were a violation of my dignity or that some of them had become conditioned by the unfavourable reactions of other clients’ parents. I now understand that the professionals know that the transparency of the truth often results in the parents taking their child elsewhere. Parents who don’t want to take responsibility for their failure hurl abuse at the therapist and therapists have a natural desire to avoid having their brains tortured and thus become conditioned to avoid the transparency of the truth.
Knowing this is one reason my mind keeps floating back to: ‘They fuck you up, your mum and dad’. I had never before realised how common it is in society for couples to have a child to fix a relationship. I haven’t been raised with the heart to consider exploring this too much further. I didn’t realise that the choices our parents make influence us before we are born and we have zero control over them; I currently lack the capacity to process what might be true for me. I didn’t realise that there is a constant simmering battle for power between couples and that some children get screwed up in the middle. I don’t feel I’m yet ready to face my fears on this.
In sharp focus is the knowledge that therapists like the ones I was taken to, are from homes like my own, from family backgrounds like mine, they have kids of their own (or they don’t). I’m no longer shocked or surprised when I read that ‘a therapist is on average more likely to fuck-up their child than a regular person’. It informs me that a therapist can only take a client to where they have reached in their own journey; they can only influence the client in the direction of their own experience and ideology. There is much that damages the integrity of the profession with therapists spanning the spectrum. Some seem to work to a sub-plot of ‘renounce your ignorance otherwise prepare for torture’, by which I mean, they are fed up of people like me, they consider me to be stupid and think they can fix me by shouting at me. While others were so hapless that they could barely repeat what they had learnt by rote on a training course. Others seemed to be in a competition to extract as much pain as possible from humdrum events of life – painting portraits of victimhood with the truth left on the wayside as ‘dry’ and ‘disappointing’.
At my lowest point, fearing that I was about to succumb to my suicidal thoughts, I took a chance and reached out to someone I’d met, not a proper friend but someone I knew had the experience to judge my situation, without judging me. His day job is as a practising dentist. The impact the experience had on me was extraordinary. I was so deeply touched that I felt the need to make a record of it in the form of a book called Nosedive – An Unconventional Rescue as my contribution to helping others stuck in broken parts of the system.
We might not have been friends but we did have a connection. He playfully referred to himself as ‘Brown boy’ and to me as ‘White boy’. He instantly felt that I was in a nosedive, and was reluctant to get involved. I believe I got lucky because after the experience he’s told me that at no time did he have the desire to save anyone from anything at any time.
Brown boy wasn’t working to any science or any textbook – he was working from his heart based on his experiences. He was carrying his burdens on his head not in his head. He told me he was reading between the lines and that doing so was as dangerous as it was necessary. He also told me he couldn’t do ‘sympathetic’ performatively and that every human interaction on the planet is 100% projection, assumption, suggestion, and inference.
There is no doubt in my mind that some people will throw scorn on Brown boy as the protagonist of provocative behaviour, while others, like me, will judge the results. He reached parts of me that the professionals never did – he saved me from suicide. The experience initiated my journey inwards and highlighted the deliberate obsolescence of the therapy industry and pointed out the heavenly deceptions concealed in religion.
Crucially, my recovery was initiated during the Nosedive experience when ‘Brown boy’ kept insisting time and again (and again): ‘Anxiety is natural’ and ‘You’ve been spoilt’ and ‘Fear is normal’ and ‘Worry isn’t’. He absolutely insisted that my life was supposed to have started with me understanding the nature of anxiety. And, that – it hadn’t. Time and again he told me that trying to keep the carefully crafted equilibrium of my early childhood undisturbed, is what tipped me into the shit heap in the first place. He explained that my insanity resulted from the attempted sanitation of my humanity and he seemed to mock me with statements like, ‘The bedlam (and, a few ounces of fifth) is a necessity’. The professionals call this
The enlightenment wasn’t easy, nor was dealing with his confident manner. At first, I struggled with my ambivalence, he offended my civility, and his nonplussed expression was disrespectful. I pushed his grand ‘executive summaries’ out of my mind as utter garbage and as a tantalisingly simple explanation for all the complex, distressing symptoms that had unfolded in my life. But the idea that anxiety had been transformed into an unnecessary, misleading, and confusing series of purported disorders kept whispering.
I realised that there was a delineation between the trained mental health support professionals and Brown boy. While the professionals had been reluctant to engage in any awkward challenging discussions, Brown boy and I argued about things for a long time. We slogged it out – unrestrained as we were. The process opened up channels that hadn’t opened before. But, contrary to his belief, I wasn’t in denial, I was lost in ignorance. Or, perhaps I was mitigating my grief. He didn’t attempt to hold my attention with grace or authority. He didn’t need to; my desperation was enough.
On occasions, I took great exception to some of the things he said. I wasn’t ready for them, I still don’t think I am now – they didn’t sound like the reality I was after. On some occasions I almost literally heard my mind sneer and snap shut. It pains me to confess that he was right though: rumour, misinformation and miscommunication within me was in the locality of paranoia, they were consistent with the logic of ‘Anxiety Dysfunction’, and they did operate in the vacuum created by the absence of an understanding of what nature intended the natural purpose of anxiety to be. I have now accepted what he shared with me that feeling unsure, uneasy, awkward, nervously intrigued is a natural part of being a free-standing, self-sustaining, self-regulating, self-governing animal. These are natural feelings that we all have from time to time, they never ever go away. They are viewed wrongly by some people like me as anxiety, and we are the same people who make statements like, “I’m not like other people, I don’t fit in”. Mental ‘Illness’ is the desire to be rid of these natural feelings by mistaking them as ‘symptoms’. Anxiety is whole different thing; it’s designed to protect us from danger. Anxiety ‘dysfunction’ is common across almost all diagnosed mental health disorders and may first occur when mum or dad or primary carers overextend on the natural desire to protect baby, they accidentally condition baby to avoid uncomfortable feelings. Remembering that anxiety is designed to protect baby from danger – it’s not designed to protect baby from discomfort. In situations where the parents neglect and/or abuse their children, these undesirable approaches can also result in anxiety ‘dysfunction’ and once initiated can escalate and become the gateway to other ‘disorders’. Although, of course, this is not true for the small number of individuals who are born with a neurological defect.
Brown boy told me unambiguously and without doubt that my only issue had been anxiety dysfunction and that because it had gone unresolved it had escalated into me displaying a host of behaviours which were indistinguishable from true neurological disorders. Thus, he explained, I had been diagnosed with disorders even though I wasn’t born with them.
The experience redefined my earlier perceptions of sympathy, empathy, love, compassion and kindness; they are now less sentimental and more transactional. I no longer believe feelings of ‘personal warmth’ and love are the same things. I’ve also reframed my understating of key concepts like psychological safety and positive psychology – they are important, and I now use them to my favour. I’ve enjoyed some psychological satisfaction and thankfully most of the time I’m generally moving towards becoming more psychologically intact.
During the experience I realised that people like me, whatever you wish to call us – ‘Aspergic’ ‘High-Functioning’ ‘Nerdy’ – need to read more, a lot more, for self-directed personal development and enlightenment. Then it dawned on me that perhaps all teenagers need to read more for self-directed personal development and enlightenment. I wonder if that’s the key to a society of empathic and compassionate amateurs like Brown boy who can make a real difference beyond ‘the system’.
In fact, knowing what I now know Nosedive – An Unconventional Rescue is the kind of book I wish I’d been forced to read and discuss with my peers and with my teachers (and, perhaps, even with my parents). We need a system that champions prevention by encouraging us to discuss our anxious thoughts and the lows with other stumbling teenagers and delivers the information and knowledge through the formative years, as opposed to the current system which is failing to resolve issues retrospectively.
Other books I’d strongly recommend…
- What Mental Illness Really Is… (And What It Isn’t) – by psychologist Dr Lucy Foulkes – talks about excessive labelling, over-diagnosing and reimagining anxiety.
- The Blank Slate – by Professor Steven Pinker. He discusses parenting styles by looking at the nature-nurture debate and how it’s been distorted.
- Good Reasons for Bad Feelings – Insights from the frontier of Evolutionary Psychiatry- by Randolph M. Nesse. The American Physician who with book Why We Get Sick, established the field of evolutionary medicine.
- The Chimp Paradox – by Professor Steve Peters – it’s an excellent book.
- An Intimate History of Humanity – by Theodore Zeldin. It helps you realise that: ‘there’s nothing new under the sun’, and it helps defeat the modern thought: ‘I can’t be right unless there’s something wrong with me’.
- Evolutionary Psychiatry – Current Perspectives on Evolution and Mental Health – by The Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK.
- George Kelly – The Psychology of Personal Constructs by Dr Trevor Butt.
****
Mad in the UK hosts blogs by a diverse group of writers. The opinions expressed are the writers’ own.
The post Finding support outside ‘the system’ appeared first on Mad in the UK.
-

Low-tech Magazine: The Uncompressed Book Series
Image: The redesigned and revised chronological book edition. Photo: Marie Verdeil.
-

Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 03/30/2026
The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only.
Downloading content without permission is copyright infringement. These torrent download statistics are only meant to provide further insight into piracy trends. All data are gathered from public resources.
This week we have three newcomers on the list. “Hoppers” is the most shared title.
The most torrented movies for the week ending on March 30 are:
Movie Rank Rank last week Movie name IMDb Rating / Trailer Most downloaded movies via torrent sites 1 (…) Hoppers 7.5 / trailer 2 (1) Crime 101 7.0 / trailer 3 (4) Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man 6.9 / trailer 4 (…) Send Help 7.0 / trailer 5 (2) One Battle After Another 7.7 / trailer 6 (3) Scream 7 5.7 / trailer 7 (5) War Machine 6.5 / trailer 8 (6) The Housemaid 6.9 / trailer 9 (7) Marty Supreme 8.0 / trailer 10 (…) Avatar 7.4 / trailer Note: We also publish an updating archive of all the list of weekly most torrented movies lists.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.